Author Affiliations
1Department of Electronic Engineering, Sogang University, Seoul 04107, Korea2Department of Electronic Engineering, Sogang University, Seoul 04107, Koreashow less
Fig. 1. (Color online) Schematic cross-sectional structure of (a) C-MOSFET, (b) CI-MOSFET, and (c) DG-MOSFET.
Fig. 2. (Color online) Proposed key fabrication process flow of DG-MOSFET. (a) Ion implantation to form the p-well and n+ source. (b) Dummy etching. (c) Dummy oxide deposition. (d) Nitride mask removal & poly-Si deposition. (e) Poly-Si etchback. (f) Gate oxidation and patterning.
Fig. 3. (Color online) Influences of WJF and NJF of C-MOSFET. (a) The trade-off between RON and BV and (b) RON and EMOX (EMOX was measured at VDS = 3300 V.).
Fig. 4. (Color online) Changes of FOM according to WJF and NJF of C-MOSFET.
Fig. 5. (Color online) The trade-off between RON and BV as variation of WCI and DCI.
Fig. 6. (Color online) FOM as a variation of WCI and DCI.
Fig. 7. (Color online) Influences of WDG and DDG of DG-MOSFET. (a) Trade-off between RON and BV and (b) RON and EMOX (EMOX was measured at VDS = 3300 V.).
Fig. 8. (Color online) Electric field distribution of three structures at VDS = 3300 V. (a) C-MOSFET. (b) CI-MOSFET. (c) DG-MOSFET.
Fig. 9. (Color online) Static characteristics of three structures.
Fig. 10. (Color online) Input and Gate-Drain capacitance of three structures.
Fig. 11. (Color online) Gate-drain charge curve of three structures.
Fig. 12. (Color online) (a) Turn off and (b) turn on transient of the three structures.
Fig. 13. (a) Buck converter and (b) boost converter circuit used in the power loss simulation.
Fig. 14. (Color online) Switching power loss in the power circuit. (a) Buck converter. (b) Boost converter.
Parameter | C-MOSFET | CI-MOSFET | DG-MOSFET |
---|
RON (mΩ∙cm2)
| 10.34 | 12.01 | 11.91 | BV (V) | 3305 | 3374 | 3343 | FOM (MW/cm2)
| 1056 | 947 | 934 |
|
Table 1. Static characteristics of the optimized three structures.
Parameter | C-MOSFET | CI-MOSFET | DG-MOSFET |
---|
CRSS and CGD were simulated at VDS = 1000 V and QGD was simulated at IGS = 100 mA and VDD = 1700 V.
| CISS (nF/cm2)
| 14.8 | 21.9 | 25.7 | CGD (pF/cm2)
| 66.67 | 21.12 | 19.36 | QGD (nC/cm2)
| 353.1 | 159.5 | 125.3 | RON×QGD (mΩ∙nC)
| 3651 | 1916 | 1492 |
|
Table 2. Capacitance and gate charge values of the three structures.
Parameter | C-MOSFET | CI-MOSFET | DG-MOSFET |
---|
EON (mJ/cm2)
| 41.9 | 17.27 | 16.03 | EOFF (mJ/cm2)
| 11.27 | 7.84 | 7.68 | ESW (mJ/cm2)
| 53.17 | 25.11 | 23.71 |
|
Table 3. Double-pulse test simulation results.
Power circuit | C-MOSFET | CI-MOSFET | DG-MOSFET |
---|
Buck converter (kW) | 20.616 | 8.934 | 7.784 | Boost converter (kW) | 48.731 | 20.923 | 18.901 |
|
Table 4. Power simulation results (f = 500 kHz).