• Journal of Semiconductors
  • Vol. 40, Issue 4, 042101 (2019)
Guiying Shen1, Youwen Zhao1、2, Yongbiao Bai1, Jingming Liu1, Hui Xie1, Zhiyuan Dong1, Jun Yang1, and Ding Yu1、2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Semiconductor Materials Science and Beijing Key Laboratory of Low-Dimensional Semiconductor Materials and Devices, Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100083, China
  • 2Center of Materials Science and Opto-Electronics Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/4/042101 Cite this Article
    Guiying Shen, Youwen Zhao, Yongbiao Bai, Jingming Liu, Hui Xie, Zhiyuan Dong, Jun Yang, Ding Yu. Photoluminescene study acceptor defects in lightly doped n type GaSb single crystals[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(4): 042101 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    Lightly Te-doped GaSb samples grown by the liquid encapsulated Czochralski (LEC) method have been studied by Hall measurements and low-temperature PL spectroscopy. The results suggest that acceptor-related antisite is the dominant defect in n-type GaSb with low Te-doping concentration. As the Te concentration increases, gallium vacancy related defects become the main acceptor. A new band of around 665 meV is observed in the GaSb sample with the lowest Te-doping concentration. The variation of the acceptor defects and their influence on the electronic and optical property on the n-GaSb single crystal are discussed based on the results.

    1. Introduction

    Gallium antimonide (GaSb) is an important semiconductor material for fabricating infrared opto-electronic devices and thermophotovoltaic cells. In particular, GaSb substrate has been successfully applied to manufacture type-II InAs/GaSb superlattice infrared detectors operating from mid to long wavelength[1, 2], which makes it important in the next generation infrared imaging system[3]. High below gap infrared transmission is expected for the GaSb substrate that is used for the infrared detectors[3, 4]. However, high concentration of native acceptor defects exist in as-grown and annealed GaSb single crystals[5, 6], which makes it exhibits strong below gap absorption[610]. Consequently, it is necessary to suppress the formation of the native acceptor defects in GaSb and also improve the structure and electrical properties.

    GaSb single crystals can be grown by three methods: the Czochralski technique (CZ), vertical gradient freeze (VGF) and liquid encapsulated Czochralski technique (LEC)[1113]. Generally, as-grown GaSb single crystals usually have p-type conduction with carrier concentration of (1–3) × 1017 cm−3[10, 14], irrespective of the growth method and technique due to the existence of gallium vacancy (VGa) and gallium antisite (GaSb), which are both doubly ionizable[8, 9]. At present, LEC is used for commercial mass-production of high quality GaSb single crystal. The VGa and GaSb defects serve as doubly ionizable native acceptors and generate some below gap absorption, which influence the optical properties of GaSb. A proper concentration of Te-doping can compensate the native acceptor defects in the maximum extent and improve the transmission of GaSb[15, 16].

    In this paper, photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy has been used to study defects in as-grown and lightly Te-doped GaSb single crystals. Special attention is paid to the variations of native acceptor defect with the change of Te-doping concentration and their combined influences on the properties of GaSb.

    2. Experiments

    (100) GaSb wafers with 750 μm thickness were sliced from lightly Te-doped GaSb bulk single crystal ingots grown by LEC technique. The wafers were polished on both sides for the optical measurement. The electrical properties, including carrier concentration and mobility were investigated through a Hall measurements system at room temperature. The PL spectra of the samples were obtained at 10 K by using a Bruker Vertex 80 FTIR equipped with an InSb detector. The excitation power of the PL spectra was 100 mW.

    3. Results and discussion

    The electrical parameters of GaSb samples with different Te-doping concentration are listed in Table 1. For n-type GaSb samples, the free carrier concentration varies from 1.66 × 1016 to 1.38 × 1017 cm−3 and the mobility changes from 2.34 × 103 to 3.34 × 103 cm2/(V·s). It has been found that the mobility increases with the increasing carrier concentration due to the compensation of Te atoms. The native defects that exist in as-grown GaSb, e.g. VGa and GaSb, have a negative effect on the electron transition process and decrease the mobility. In Te-doped GaSb samples, the Te atoms are very likely to occupy the sites of vacancy defects. Thus, the ionized impurity scatting is suppressed and the mobility will increase with the increasing Te-doping concentration. However, when it turns from sample 6 to 7, the mobility decreases from 3.34 × 103 to 3.24 × 103 cm2/(V·s), due to the stronger free carrier scatting exists in sample 7. Samples 8 and 9 have p-type conduction with relative low mobility. The low mobility of sample 8, which is prepared as an undoped wafer, can be attributed to the high concentration of native acceptor defects. The mobility of sample 9, which is lightly Te-doped GaSb, is higher than that of sample 8 because of the light degree of compensation of Te atoms. The electrical properties of samples 8 and 9 are listed in Table 1 as a comparison to find the transformation of the defects concentration and properties. The charge-neutrality condition can be written as

    Table Infomation Is Not Enable

    $ {n_0} + N_{\rm{A}}^ - = N_{{\rm D_1}}^ + + N_{{\rm D_2}}^ + + {p_0}, $  (1)

    where n0 denotes the electron concentration, is the concentration of ionized acceptors, and are the concentration of ionized Te atoms and another donor, p0 is the hole concentration. In p-type GaSb, holes are the main carrier and electrons make little contribution to carrier concentration. Thus, the electric charge balance equation can be simplified as,

    $ N_{\rm{A}}^ - = {p_0}, $  (2)

    i.e. high concentration of native acceptor (VGa and GaSb) exhibits in p-type GaSb. In n-type GaSb, electrons become the main carrier, while the concentration of holes and ionized acceptors can be ignored. Te atoms ionized as donors play a leading role in compensating the native acceptor defects, forming the main ionized acceptors in the structure of VGaTeSb.

    Photoluminescene (PL) measurement can be effectively used to study the details of defects in a material. More information about the electron and exciton transitions can be obtained from PL spectra measured at low temperature. It is found that four kinds of absorption process exhibit in GaSb single crystals[17]. It is also reported that the main PL peak (named A) around 777 meV for the as-grown GaSb is considered to be related to the native acceptor defects VGa and GaSb. For the as-grown and lightly Te-doped p-type samples, there are two peaks around A located at 756 and 797 meV, respectively. The PL peak at 756 meV is attributed to the transition from conduction band to the acceptor center. The 797 meV peak corresponds to the neutral acceptor, whose concentration is in a unity of opposites with that of native acceptor defects. For n-type GaSb, a band around 700 meV (named C) relating to the native double acceptor grows and its intensity increases with the decreasing carrier concentration. Nevertheless, it will disappear when the carrier concentration exceeds 7 × 1017 cm−3 due to the high compensation. The peak around 800 meV (named D) is referred to as a free-to-bound recombination and integrates with band A. For Te-doped GaSb, a peak named T appears and it becomes the dominate peak as the doping level increases. It is found that this peak corresponds to free-to-bound recombination of Te atoms and complex defects (TeSbVGaGaSb). There are some other peaks at 805, 803, 800, 796 meV which are related to the transition from excitons bound to the neutral native complex defect (VGaGaSb). The related transition mechanism of the PL spectra is summarized in Table 2[1820].

    Table Infomation Is Not Enable

    Fig. 1 shows the PL spectra of the p-type GaSb samples. It can be seen that the intensity of the peak A and the peak at 756 meV is lower than that of sample 9. While the intensity of the 797 meV peak increases after doping Te atoms lightly. It has been reported that band A is related to the VGa and the peak at 756 meV is attributed to GaSb, inferring that the VGa and GaSb defects will be restrained by doping with Te atoms. The increasing intensity of the 797 meV peak indicates a decreasing of concentration of native defects[5]. It should be noted that some other peaks around 810 meV are related to free-exciton transitions in GaSb, although these peaks are not listed above due to their weakness. For the n-type GaSb samples shown in Figs. 24, peaks A and D merge into one peak and the intensity of the new peak becomes weaker as the carrier concentration increases. It almost disappears in sample 7 with a carrier concentration of 1.38 × 1017 cm−3, which can be attributed to the adequate Te atoms that compensate the native acceptor defects. The peak at 756 meV also disappears with the increase of Te-doping concentration, which indicates that the GaSb defects have been annihilated. It is easier for Te impurities to occupy the sits of GaSb than VGa. Thus, VGa acceptors become the main acceptor defects in the Te-doped samples.

    (Color online) PL spectra of p-type GaSb samples measured at 10 K.

    Figure 1.(Color online) PL spectra of p-type GaSb samples measured at 10 K.

    (Color online) PL spectra of sample 2 at 10 K.

    Figure 2.(Color online) PL spectra of sample 2 at 10 K.

    (Color online) PL spectra of samples 1, 3 and 4 at 10 K.

    Figure 3.(Color online) PL spectra of samples 1, 3 and 4 at 10 K.

    In Figs. 24, a broad peak with several resolved peaks shows up and it dominates the spectrum of the Te-doped GaSb with the carrier concentration below 1.4 × 1017 cm−3. In the lightly Te doped GaSb samples, the broad band incorporates a new peak, named peak G, around 664 meV, which is related to the complex defects consisting of totally ionized Te atoms and partial compensated native acceptor defects, such as VGa and GaSb. As the doping concentration increases, more native acceptor defects are compensated by the ionized Te atoms. Thus, the PL peak of the complex defects becomes weaker as the Te-doping concentration increases. It is expected that a native acceptor defect will be compensated completely when the doping concentration exceeds the critical value, resulting in annihilation of the complex defects.

    (Color online) PL spectra of samples 5, 6 and 7 at 10 K.

    Figure 4.(Color online) PL spectra of samples 5, 6 and 7 at 10 K.

    Table 3 shows the position and strength of peaks G, C and T which are resolved from the integrated broaden peak (the resolved peak A and D are not listed due to their weakness). Peak G shows relatively high strength for sample 1 and it then drops rapidly with the increase of Te-doping concentration. Peak G almost disappears, when it turns to sample 6 and 7. The intensity of peak C shows a little increase from sample 1 to 4 and then drops rapidly as the carrier concentration increases. The increase can be explained as the change of occupation state of the residual acceptors which leads to the moving up of Fermi level[17]. The decreasing intensity is caused by the reduction of the native double acceptors as the doping level increases. In the Te-doped samples, band T becomes the dominant peak. The intensity of peak T shows a slight decrease from sample 1 to 4 and then increases from sample 5 to 7. The existence of the complex defects corresponding to peak G may be the reason for the variation of peak C. This can be further confirmed from the decrease of peak G. As the carrier concentration increases, the native acceptor defects have been compensated and the Te-related complex defects become the main optical motivation. The defects character has been changed from native acceptors to Te atoms related complexes in GaSb samples. In addition, from Eq. (1), as the carrier concentration increases, the n0 keeps increasing while the decreases, which indicates the decline of the native acceptors including VGa and GaSb. At the same time some defects related to Te atoms appear. It can be seen the broad peak containing C and T shows a blue shift about 30 meV as the carrier concentration increases from 1.66 × 1016 to 1.38 × 1017 cm−3. It can be concluded that the low energy tails caused by the heavy doping effects appear, leading to the growth of the high-energy side of the bands. Thus, the blueshifts[17] of the peak C and T have been observed.

    Table Infomation Is Not Enable

    Vlasov has pointed out that the FWHM of peak C is proportional to the defect concentration[9]. It can be seen from the figure that the FWHM of peak C decreases from sample 1 to sample 5, indicating that the concentration of the native double acceptors decreases with the increase of Te compensation. However, in samples 6 and 7, the FWHM of PL peaks are larger than that of sample 5, which can be attributed to the decrease of band C and the increase of band T. Moreover, the broadening of the optical absorption caused by the introducing of impurity energy level with excessive carrier could also be responsible for this result. In the relatively high-energy region, there is a broad and weak band from 730 to 777 meV containing B (760 meV), A-LO (749 meV), U (743 meV) and B-LO (732 meV)[20]. Peaks A and B are related to the deep acceptors. A-LO and B-LO are in connection with LO phonon replicas of peaks A and B. All of these bands decrease from sample 1 to 3 and then increase from sample 3 to 5, because the concentration of deep acceptors increase with the carrier concentration. in samples 6 and 7, the related band disappears due to the excessive Te atoms which have compensated the deep acceptor. None of these peaks are pointed out in the figures due to their weakness.

    4. Conclusion

    The electrical and optical properties of the as-grown and lightly Te-doped GaSb samples have been investigated through Hall measurement and PL spectra. Native acceptor defects are suppressed with the increasing Te-doping concentration. The PL spectra show good correlation between the Te-doping concentration and the intensity of the defect related peaks. In the native acceptor defects GaSb and VGa that are compensated by Te atoms and GaSb related peaks almost totally disappear when VGa defects become the main acceptor defects. A new band around 665 meV appears in the samples with carrier concentration below 7.84 × 1016 cm−3. It can be argued that this band corresponds to the complex defects consisting of ionized Te atom, native acceptor defects VGa and GaSb. More native acceptor defects are compensated by the ionized Te atoms, as the doping concentration increases. It is also found that native acceptor defects are compensated completely when the doping concentration exceeds the critical value, resulting in annihilation of the complex defects.

    References

    [1] P S Dutta, H L Bhat, V Kumar. The physics and technology of gallium antimonide: An emerging optoelectronic material. J Appl Phys, 81, 5821(1997).

    [2] N Zia, J Viheriälä, R Koskinen et al. High power (60 mW) GaSb-based 1.9 μm superluminescent diode with cavity suppression element. Appl Phys Lett, 109, 231102(2016).

    [3] X Zhou, D Li, J Huang et al. Mid-wavelength type II InAs/GaSb superlattice infrared focal plane arrays. Infrared Phys Technol, 78, 263(2016).

    [4] H J Haugan, G J Brown, F Szmulowicz et al. InAs/GaSb type-II superlattices for high performance mid-infrared detectors. J Cryst Growth, 278, 198(2005).

    [5] J Su, T Liu, J M Liu et al. Thermally induced native defect transform in annealed GaSb. Chin Phys B, 25, 077801(2016).

    [6] J Kujala, N Segercrantz, F Tuomisto et al. Native point defects in GaSb. J Appl Phys, 116, 143508(2014).

    [7] N Segercrantz, J Slotte, I Makkonen et al. Point defect balance in epitaxial GaSb. Appl Phys Lett, 105, 082113(2014).

    [8] H A Tahini, A Chroneos, S T Murphy et al. Vacancies and defect levels in III–V semiconductors. J Appl Phys, 114, 063517(2013).

    [9] A S Vlasov, E P Rakova, V P Khvostikov et al. Native defect concentration in Czochralski-grown Te-doped GaSb by photoluminescence. Sol Energ Mat Sol C, 94, 1113(2010).

    [10] W G Hu, Z Wang, B F Su et al. Gallium antisite defect and residual acceptors in undoped GaSb. Phys Lett A, 332, 286(2004).

    [11] P Rudolph, M Czupalla, B Lux. LEC growth of semi-insulating GaAs crystals in traveling magnetic field generated in a heater–magnet module. J Cryst Growth, 311, 4543(2009).

    [12] B C Houchens, P Becla, S E Tritchler et al. Crystal growth of bulk ternary semiconductors: comparison of GaInSb growth by horizontal Bridgman and horizontal traveling heater method. J Cryst Growth, 312, 1091(2010).

    [13] P G Mo, H Z Tan, L X Du et al. A novel technique for Czochralski growth of GaSb single crystals. J Cryst Growth, 126, 613(1993).

    [14] R Pino, Y Ko, P S Dutta. Enhancement of infrared transmission in GaSb bulk crystals by carrier compensation. J Appl Phys, 96, 1064(2004).

    [15] Y B Bai, Y W Zhao, G Y Shen et al. N-type GaSb single crystals with high below-band gap transmission. Chin Phys B, 26, 107801(2017).

    [16] A Chandola, R Pino, P S Dutta. Below bandgap optical absorption in tellurium-doped GaSb. Semicond Sci Technol, 20, 886(2005).

    [17] A Bignazzi, A Bosacchi, R Magnanini. Photoluminescence study of heavy doping effects in Te-doped GaSb. J Appl Phys, 81, 7540(1997).

    [18] M C Wu, C C Chen. Photoluminescence of liquid-phase epitaxial Te-doped GaSb. J Appl Phys, 73, 8495(1993).

    [19] P S Dutta, K S R K Rao, H L Bhat et al. Photoluminescence studies in bulk gallium antimonide. Appl Phys A, 61, 149(1995).

    [20] W J Jiang, Y M Sun, M C Wu. Electrical and photoluminescent properties of high-quality GaSb and AlGaSb layers grown from Sb-rich solutions by liquid-phase epitaxy. J Appl Phys, 77, 1725(1995).

    Guiying Shen, Youwen Zhao, Yongbiao Bai, Jingming Liu, Hui Xie, Zhiyuan Dong, Jun Yang, Ding Yu. Photoluminescene study acceptor defects in lightly doped n type GaSb single crystals[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(4): 042101
    Download Citation