• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 10, Issue 7, 1703 (2022)
Cong Jiang1、2, Xiao-Long Hu3, Zong-Wen Yu4, and Xiang-Bin Wang1、2、5、6、7、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Jinan Institute of Quantum Technology, Jinan 250101, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Low Dimensional Quantum Physics, Department of Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • 3School of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
  • 4Data Communication Science and Technology Research Institute, Beijing 100191, China
  • 5Shanghai Branch, CAS Center for Excellence and Synergetic Innovation Center in Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Shanghai 201315, China
  • 6Shenzhen Institute for Quantum Science and Engineering, and Physics Department, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
  • 7Frontier Science Center for Quantum Information, Beijing, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.445617 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Cong Jiang, Xiao-Long Hu, Zong-Wen Yu, Xiang-Bin Wang. Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution protocol with phase post-selection[J]. Photonics Research, 2022, 10(7): 1703 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution (MDI-QKD) protocol can remove all the loopholes of the detection devices and, thus, has attracted much attention. Based on the technique of single-photon interference, we propose a modified MDI-QKD protocol with phase post-selection. We prove the security of the announcement of the private phases in the X basis and show how to apply the phase post-selection method to the double-scanning four-intensity MDI-QKD protocol. The numerical results show that the phase post-selection method can significantly improve the key rates at all distances. In the double-scanning method, two parameters need to be scanned in the calculation of the final key rate, and the global parameter optimization is pretty time-consuming. We propose an accelerated method that can greatly reduce the running time of the global parameter optimization program. This makes the method practically useful in an unstable channel.
    |eiθμ=m=0eμ/2eimθμmm!|m,

    View in Article

    1|cos(θajθbj)|λ.

    View in Article

    1|cos(θajθbj)|λ.

    View in Article

    ρ=14π02πdθaj[Ω(δi)+Ω(δi+π)],

    View in Article

    Ω(δi)=|ei(θaj+γaj)μxAei(θaj+γaj)μxA||ei(θaj+γbjδi)μxBei(θaj+γbjδi)μxB|.

    View in Article

    ρ=c11|1111|+(1c11)ρ,

    View in Article

    ραβ=m=0n=0amαbnβ|mnmn|,

    View in Article

    amα=μαAmeμαAm!,bnβ=μβBneμβBn!,

    View in Article

    Nαβ=pαApβBN.

    View in Article

    ρQ=c11|1111|+(1c11)ρ,

    View in Article

    s11L=S+L+a1yb2yNxxMSUa1yb2yHa1xa1y(b1xb2yb2xb1y),

    View in Article

    S+=a1yb2yNxxm¯xx+a1xb2xa0yNoynoy+a1xb2xb0yNyonyo,

    View in Article

    S=a1xb2xNyynyy+a1xb2xa0yb0yNoonoo,

    View in Article

    H=a0xNoxnox+b0xNxonxoa0xb0xNoonoo,

    View in Article

    e11U=M/NxxH/2a1xb1xs11L.

    View in Article

    cosΔ2=1λ,

    View in Article

    e11U=mQΔ/πNxxa1xb1xs11L.

    View in Article

    e11phU=min(M/NxxH/2a1xb1xs11L,mQΔ/πNxxa1xb1xs11L).

    View in Article

    s11,ZL=OL(Nzza1zb1zs11L)Nzza1zb1z,

    View in Article

    e11ph,U=OU(Nzza1zb1zs11,ZLe11phU)Nzza1zb1zs11,ZL,

    View in Article

    R(H,M)=pzApzB{a1zb1zs11,ZL[1h(e11ph,U)]fSzzh(Ezz)}1N(log28εcor+2log22εε^+2log212εPA),

    View in Article

    R=minH[HL,HU],M[ML,MU]R(H,M).

    View in Article

    H(t11)={HU,t11+HU/2MU/Nxx,2(MU/Nxxt11),t11+HU/2>MU/Nxx.

    View in Article

    s11L=S+L+a1yb2y[t11H(t11)/2]SUa1xa1y(b1xb2yb2xb1y),

    View in Article

    e11phU=t11a1xb1xs11L.

    View in Article

    R=mint11[TL,TU]R(t11).

    View in Article

    e11phU(t11w)=TQa1xb1xs11L(t11w)>e11phU(t11v)=TQa1xb1xs11L(t11v).

    View in Article

    EL(X)=X1+δ1(X),(A1)

    View in Article

    EU(X)=X1δ2(X),(A2)

    View in Article

    [eδ1(1+δ1)1+δ1]X1+δ1=ξ,(A3)

    View in Article

    [eδ2(1δ2)1δ2]X1δ2=ξ,(A4)

    View in Article

    OU(Y)=[1+δ1(Y)]Y,(A5)

    View in Article

    OL(Y)=[1δ2(Y)]Y,(A6)

    View in Article

    [eδ1(1+δ1)1+δ1]Y=ξ,(A7)

    View in Article

    [eδ2(1δ2)1δ2]Y=ξ.(A8)

    View in Article

    |ψ1=|eiθaμa|eiθbμb,(B1)

    View in Article

    |ψ1=eμa/2μb/2eμaeiθaa+μbeiθbb+|00.(B2)

    View in Article

    |ψ2=eμa/2μb/2e(μa2eiθa+μb2eiθb)(aH+aV)×e(μa2eiθaμb2eiθb)(bH+bV)|00,(B3)

    View in Article

    M^=[IaH(1pd)|0aH0aH|][IaV(1pd)|0aV0aV|](1pd)|0bH0bH|(1pd)|0bV0bV|.(B4)

    View in Article

    p1H,1V=tr(M^|ψ2ψ2|)=eμaμb[eμa4+μb4+μaμb2cosδ(1pd)]2(1pd)2,(B5)

    View in Article

    p1H,2V=p2H,1V=eμaμb[eμa4+μb4+μaμb2cosδ(1pd)]×[eμa4+μb4μaμb2cosδ(1pd)](1pd)2,(B6)

    View in Article

    p2H,2V=eμaμb[eμa4+μb4μaμb2cosδ(1pd)]2(1pd)2.(B7)

    View in Article

    PW=p1H,2V+p2H,1V,PR=p1H,1V+p2H,2V.(B8)

    View in Article

    mQ=12πNpxApxB(Δ2Δ2PWdδ+πΔ2π+Δ2PWdδ),(B9)

    View in Article

    nQ=12πNpxApxB(Δ2Δ2PRdδ+πΔ2π+Δ2PRdδ)+mQ,(B10)

    View in Article

    Cong Jiang, Xiao-Long Hu, Zong-Wen Yu, Xiang-Bin Wang. Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution protocol with phase post-selection[J]. Photonics Research, 2022, 10(7): 1703
    Download Citation