• Journal of Semiconductors
  • Vol. 40, Issue 10, 101303 (2019)
Wenqi Wei1, Qi Feng1, Zihao Wang1、2, Ting Wang1、2, and Jianjun Zhang1、2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
  • 2Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronic Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/10/101303 Cite this Article
    Wenqi Wei, Qi Feng, Zihao Wang, Ting Wang, Jianjun Zhang. Perspective: optically-pumped III–V quantum dot microcavity lasers via CMOS compatible patterned Si (001) substrates[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(10): 101303 Copy Citation Text show less
    (Color online) (a) The plot of bandgap energy and wavelength versus lattice constant and misfit between III–V and group IV [20]. The electron and hole mobilities in units of cm2/(V·s) are also shown below the chemical symbols. (b) Cross-sectional TEM image on the interface between GaAs and silicon.
    Fig. 1. (Color online) (a) The plot of bandgap energy and wavelength versus lattice constant and misfit between III–V and group IV [20]. The electron and hole mobilities in units of cm2/(V·s) are also shown below the chemical symbols. (b) Cross-sectional TEM image on the interface between GaAs and silicon.
    (Color online) (a) Schematic showing polar/nonpolar interface between GaAs and Ge. Mono-atomic steps on Ge surface result in APBs, planes of As–As or Ga–Ga bonds. The antiphase domains (APBs) can also self-annihilate (left) or rise to the epi-layer surface (right). Diatomic steps on the Ge surface (center) do not result in APB formation[25]. (b) Surface AFM image of GaAs grown on Si (001) substrate, which indicates a high density of APBs.
    Fig. 2. (Color online) (a) Schematic showing polar/nonpolar interface between GaAs and Ge. Mono-atomic steps on Ge surface result in APBs, planes of As–As or Ga–Ga bonds. The antiphase domains (APBs) can also self-annihilate (left) or rise to the epi-layer surface (right). Diatomic steps on the Ge surface (center) do not result in APB formation[25]. (b) Surface AFM image of GaAs grown on Si (001) substrate, which indicates a high density of APBs.
    Optical microscope image of the thermal cracks on III–V/Si surface.
    Fig. 3. Optical microscope image of the thermal cracks on III–V/Si surface.
    (Color online) (a) 5 × 5 μm2 AFM image of 250 nm GaAs buffer layer epitaxial growth on Ge substrate. (b) Cross-sectional TEM image at the interface of GaAs and Ge.
    Fig. 4. (Color online) (a) 5 × 5 μm2 AFM image of 250 nm GaAs buffer layer epitaxial growth on Ge substrate. (b) Cross-sectional TEM image at the interface of GaAs and Ge.
    (Color online) (a) The schematic of 5-layer InAs/GaAs QD structure grown on Ge substrate for O-band wavelength emission. (b) RT PL spectra of InAs/GaAs QDs on GaAs/Ge substrate and GaAs substrate, respectively. Inset: Zoomed-in cross-sectional TEM image of InAs/GaAs QDs on GaAs/Ge substrate.
    Fig. 5. (Color online) (a) The schematic of 5-layer InAs/GaAs QD structure grown on Ge substrate for O-band wavelength emission. (b) RT PL spectra of InAs/GaAs QDs on GaAs/Ge substrate and GaAs substrate, respectively. Inset: Zoomed-in cross-sectional TEM image of InAs/GaAs QDs on GaAs/Ge substrate.
    (Color online) (a) 5 × 5 μm2 AFM image of InGaAs metamorphic buffer layer epitaxially grown on GaAs/Ge substrate. (b) The cross-sectional TEM image of the epitaxial structures on Ge. The arrow shows the growth direction. (c) High-magnification TEM image of a truncated InAs/InGaAs QD. (d) RT PL spectra of InAs/InGaAs QDs grown on both Ge substrate and GaAs substrate. Inset: 1 × 1 μm2 AFM image of InAs QDs on Ge substrate.
    Fig. 6. (Color online) (a) 5 × 5 μm2 AFM image of InGaAs metamorphic buffer layer epitaxially grown on GaAs/Ge substrate. (b) The cross-sectional TEM image of the epitaxial structures on Ge. The arrow shows the growth direction. (c) High-magnification TEM image of a truncated InAs/InGaAs QD. (d) RT PL spectra of InAs/InGaAs QDs grown on both Ge substrate and GaAs substrate. Inset: 1 × 1 μm2 AFM image of InAs QDs on Ge substrate.
    (Color online) (a), (b) and (c) Cross-sectional SEM images of U-shape patterned Si substrate, homoepitaxy of 550 nm Si on (111)-faceted Si hollow substrate, and III–V buffer layers on (111)-faceted Si hollow substrate, respectively. All the images are taken along the [110] axis. (d) 10 × 10 μm2 AFM image of III–V buffer layers on Si substrate.
    Fig. 7. (Color online) (a), (b) and (c) Cross-sectional SEM images of U-shape patterned Si substrate, homoepitaxy of 550 nm Si on (111)-faceted Si hollow substrate, and III–V buffer layers on (111)-faceted Si hollow substrate, respectively. All the images are taken along the [110] axis. (d) 10 × 10 μm2 AFM image of III–V buffer layers on Si substrate.
    (Color online) (a) Cross-sectional TEM image of GaAs on (111)-faceted Si hollow substrate, taken along [110] axis. (b) Plan-view ECCI to show TDs on GaAs/Si template. (c) Plan-view TEM image of GaAs surface on Si.
    Fig. 8. (Color online) (a) Cross-sectional TEM image of GaAs on (111)-faceted Si hollow substrate, taken along [110] axis. (b) Plan-view ECCI to show TDs on GaAs/Si template. (c) Plan-view TEM image of GaAs surface on Si.
    (Color online) (a) RT PL spectra of InAs/GaAs QDs grown on both GaAs and GaAs/Si (001) substrates, for O-band emission. Inset: 1 × 1 μm2 AFM image of InAs/GaAs QDs on GaAs/Si substrate. (b) RT PL spectra of InAs/InGaAs QDs grown on both GaAs and GaAs/Si (001) substrates, for C/L-band emission. Inset: 1 × 1 μm2 AFM image of surface InAs/InGaAs QDs on GaAs/Si substrate.
    Fig. 9. (Color online) (a) RT PL spectra of InAs/GaAs QDs grown on both GaAs and GaAs/Si (001) substrates, for O-band emission. Inset: 1 × 1 μm2 AFM image of InAs/GaAs QDs on GaAs/Si substrate. (b) RT PL spectra of InAs/InGaAs QDs grown on both GaAs and GaAs/Si (001) substrates, for C/L-band emission. Inset: 1 × 1 μm2 AFM image of surface InAs/InGaAs QDs on GaAs/Si substrate.
    (Color online) Schematic diagrams of (a) microdisk laser structure and (b) microdisk laser on GaAs/Si (001) substrate. (c) and (d) Tilted SEM images of microdisk lasers on GaAs (001) and GaAs/Si (001) substrates, respectively.
    Fig. 10. (Color online) Schematic diagrams of (a) microdisk laser structure and (b) microdisk laser on GaAs/Si (001) substrate. (c) and (d) Tilted SEM images of microdisk lasers on GaAs (001) and GaAs/Si (001) substrates, respectively.
    (Color online) Integrated intensity of microdisk lasers versus the power of pump laser on (a) GaAs substrate and (c) Si (001) substrate, respectively. Inset: the log–log plot of ‘L–L curve’. PL spectra of microdisk lasers on (b) GaAs substrate and (d) Si (001) substrate, respectively, under different pump powers.
    Fig. 11. (Color online) Integrated intensity of microdisk lasers versus the power of pump laser on (a) GaAs substrate and (c) Si (001) substrate, respectively. Inset: the log–log plot of ‘L–L curve’. PL spectra of microdisk lasers on (b) GaAs substrate and (d) Si (001) substrate, respectively, under different pump powers.
    Wenqi Wei, Qi Feng, Zihao Wang, Ting Wang, Jianjun Zhang. Perspective: optically-pumped III–V quantum dot microcavity lasers via CMOS compatible patterned Si (001) substrates[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(10): 101303
    Download Citation