• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 20, Issue 12, 121101 (2022)
Xiangyu Pei, Xunbo Yu*, Xin Gao, Xinhui Xie, Yuedi Wang, Xinzhu Sang, and Binbin Yan
Author Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communications, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL202220.121101 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xiangyu Pei, Xunbo Yu, Xin Gao, Xinhui Xie, Yuedi Wang, Xinzhu Sang, Binbin Yan. End-to-end optimization of a diffractive optical element and aberration correction for integral imaging[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2022, 20(12): 121101 Copy Citation Text show less
    Overall workflow diagram of this experiment: (a) parallax image acquisition and synthesis; (b) proposed end-to-end optimization method workflow; and (c) optical reconstruction.
    Fig. 1. Overall workflow diagram of this experiment: (a) parallax image acquisition and synthesis; (b) proposed end-to-end optimization method workflow; and (c) optical reconstruction.
    Imaging process of an actual optical system.
    Fig. 2. Imaging process of an actual optical system.
    Schematic diagram of the light intensity distribution at different field points on the image plane.
    Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of the light intensity distribution at different field points on the image plane.
    Pre-correction network structure.
    Fig. 4. Pre-correction network structure.
    All 36 subsections of an EI and its corresponding diffractive lens unit.
    Fig. 5. All 36 subsections of an EI and its corresponding diffractive lens unit.
    Experimental results with end-to-end optimization: (a) diffractive element profile; (b) loss curve during training; and (c) PSF of nine fields of view, in logarithmic scale.
    Fig. 6. Experimental results with end-to-end optimization: (a) diffractive element profile; (b) loss curve during training; and (c) PSF of nine fields of view, in logarithmic scale.
    Experimental results without pre-correction network: (a) diffractive element profile; (b) loss curve during training; and (c) PSF of nine fields of view, in logarithmic scale.
    Fig. 7. Experimental results without pre-correction network: (a) diffractive element profile; (b) loss curve during training; and (c) PSF of nine fields of view, in logarithmic scale.
    Simulation results for different viewing positions (with multiple PSFs): (a) original scene; (b) simulation results without pre-correction network; and (c) simulation results with end-to-end optimization.
    Fig. 8. Simulation results for different viewing positions (with multiple PSFs): (a) original scene; (b) simulation results without pre-correction network; and (c) simulation results with end-to-end optimization.
    Simulation results for different viewing positions (with a single PSF): (a) original scene; (b) simulation results without pre-correction network; and (c) simulation results with end-to-end optimization.
    Fig. 9. Simulation results for different viewing positions (with a single PSF): (a) original scene; (b) simulation results without pre-correction network; and (c) simulation results with end-to-end optimization.
    ParametersValues
    Aperture diameter5 mm
    Light source distance (zo)20 mm
    Propagation distance (d)500 mm
    Focal length19.23 mm
    F number3.85
    Number of training dataset images64×36 (2304)
    Number of image subregions6×6 (36)
    Table 1. Optical Element and Image Dataset Parameters
    Xiangyu Pei, Xunbo Yu, Xin Gao, Xinhui Xie, Yuedi Wang, Xinzhu Sang, Binbin Yan. End-to-end optimization of a diffractive optical element and aberration correction for integral imaging[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2022, 20(12): 121101
    Download Citation