• Journal of Inorganic Materials
  • Vol. 37, Issue 2, 223 (2022)
Qingying FENG, Dong LIU, Ying ZHANG*, Hao FENG, and Qiang LI*
Author Affiliations
  • School of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.15541/jim20210164 Cite this Article
    Qingying FENG, Dong LIU, Ying ZHANG, Hao FENG, Qiang LI. Thermodynamic and First-principles Assessments of Materials for Solar-driven CO2 Splitting Using Two-step Thermochemical Cycles [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2022, 37(2): 223 Copy Citation Text show less
    Thermodynamic assessment mapThe combination of ΔSsolid and ΔHsolid of redox material candidates should fall in the shaded triangular region. The experimental data points (open scatters) of (ΔSsolid, ΔHsolid) were plotted for pure CeO2/CeO2-δ and 10% Samaria-doped Ce0.9Sm0.1O1.95/Ce0.9Sm0.1O1.95-δ redox pairs (δ=0.01-0.05)[28,29]. The calculation results (solid scatters) in Section 2 were also plotted for these redox pairs (δ=0.03). Error bars represent standard deviations. Colourful figure is available on website
    1. Thermodynamic assessment mapThe combination of ΔSsolid and ΔHsolid of redox material candidates should fall in the shaded triangular region. The experimental data points (open scatters) of (ΔSsolid, ΔHsolid) were plotted for pure CeO2/CeO2-δ and 10% Samaria-doped Ce0.9Sm0.1O1.95/Ce0.9Sm0.1O1.95-δ redox pairs (δ=0.01-0.05)[28,29]. The calculation results (solid scatters) in Section 2 were also plotted for these redox pairs (δ=0.03). Error bars represent standard deviations. Colourful figure is available on website
    Variations of the favorable regions with operating conditions of the thermal reduction step (Reaction (2)) (a) Temperature. TH=2000 and 1773 K; (b) Pressure. PO2=0.101, 1.01 and 101 kPa. Other conditions in (a, b) are the same with those in Fig. 1; Colourful figure is available on website
    2. Variations of the favorable regions with operating conditions of the thermal reduction step (Reaction (2)) (a) Temperature. TH=2000 and 1773 K; (b) Pressure. PO2=0.101, 1.01 and 101 kPa. Other conditions in (a, b) are the same with those in Fig. 1; Colourful figure is available on website
    Supercells for DFT+U calculations (a) Bulk CeO2 supercell; (b) CeO2 supercell with a single oxygen- vacancy defect; (c) CeO2 supercell with a single polaron defect(The charge density of the polaron is also shown); (d) Sm-doped CeO2 supercell (Methods in Supporting Materials)
    3. Supercells for DFT+U calculations (a) Bulk CeO2 supercell; (b) CeO2 supercell with a single oxygen- vacancy defect; (c) CeO2 supercell with a single polaron defect(The charge density of the polaron is also shown); (d) Sm-doped CeO2 supercell (Methods in Supporting Materials)
    Variations of $\Delta {{S}_{\text{V}_{\text{O}}^{\centerdot \centerdot }}}$, $2\Delta {{S}_{\text{C}{{{\text{{e}'}}}_{\text{Ce}}}}}$, ΔSvib, and ΔSsolid with temperature Solid and dash curves are for CeO2/CeO2-δ and Ce0.9Sm0.1O1.95/Ce0.9Sm0.1O1.95-δ redox pairs (δ=0.03), respectively; Colourful figure is available on website
    4. Variations of $\Delta {{S}_{\text{V}_{\text{O}}^{\centerdot \centerdot }}}$, $2\Delta {{S}_{\text{C}{{{\text{{e}'}}}_{\text{Ce}}}}}$, ΔSvib, and ΔSsolid with temperature Solid and dash curves are for CeO2/CeO2-δ and Ce0.9Sm0.1O1.95/Ce0.9Sm0.1O1.95-δ redox pairs (δ=0.03), respectively; Colourful figure is available on website
    Illustration of a viable screening approach
    5. Illustration of a viable screening approach
    Phonon dispersion of a 10% samaria-doped ceria supercell comprising an oxygen vacancy
    S1. Phonon dispersion of a 10% samaria-doped ceria supercell comprising an oxygen vacancy
    Calculated variations of (a) αV, (b) KT and (c) αV×KT with temperatures
    S2. Calculated variations of (a) αV, (b) KT and (c) αV×KT with temperatures
    OxideΔVrel, vacancy/ nm3ΔVrel, polaron/nm3
    CeO2-δ-0.01700.0139
    Ce0.9Sm0.1O1.95-δ-0.01700.0144
    Table 1.

    Relaxation volumes due to formations of an oxygen vacancy and a polaron for CeO2-δ and Ce0.9Sm0.1O1.95-δ

    Redox pairRef.ΔSvibaΔSconfaΔSsolidaΔHsolida
    CeO2-δ (δ=0.03) Experimental[28]--~91.2b~429
    Experimental[31]--~105.9b~441
    This work13.780.594.2476.7
    Ce0.9Sm0.1O1.95-δ (δ=0.03) Experimental[29]--~67.7b~400
    This work9.170.379.4376.5
    Table 1.

    Comparison between calculated and measured values of ΔSsolid and ΔHsolid

    Qingying FENG, Dong LIU, Ying ZHANG, Hao FENG, Qiang LI. Thermodynamic and First-principles Assessments of Materials for Solar-driven CO2 Splitting Using Two-step Thermochemical Cycles [J]. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2022, 37(2): 223
    Download Citation