Xiaoxuan Luo, Yin Cai, Xin Yue, Wei Lin, Jingping Zhu, Yanpeng Zhang, Feng Li, "Non-Hermitian control of confined optical skyrmions in microcavities formed by photonic spin–orbit coupling," Photonics Res. 11, 610 (2023)

Search by keywords or author
- Photonics Research
- Vol. 11, Issue 4, 610 (2023)

Fig. 1. Polarization textures of the eigenstates of the second excited manifold. (a) Schematic of the TE-TM splitting characterized by β . (b) Sketch of an open-access microcavity; the concave-planar mirror configuration provides the confined potential V . (c) Energy levels of the eigenstates under the effect of TE-TM splitting. α is the parameter determining mode size. (d)–(i) Left panels, polarization textures of each eigenstate which is instructed in the main text; right panels, the four small graphs representing the intensity distribution, Stokes components S 1 , S 2 , and S 3 . The states presented in (d) and (e), (f) and (g), (h) and (i) are all twofold degenerate in energy. The following parameters are used: α = 1.54 μm − 1 , β = 0.06 meV · μm 2 .

Fig. 2. Optical skyrmions with lifting and keeping the mode degeneracy. (a) Left panel, polarization textures of the linear combination of degenerate skyrmion-like states with J = ± 1 at zero phase difference; right panels, the four small graphs represent the intensity distribution, Stokes components S 1 , S 2 , and S 3 . (b) Polarization degree S 0 of the incoherent superposition of the two degenerate skyrmion-like states.

Fig. 3. Non-Hermitian control of the optical skyrmions. (a) Real and (b) imaginary parts of the eigenvalues as a function of the circular gain and loss ρ . (c) and (d) are, respectively, the same as (a) and (b) except that ρ is enveloped by Gaussian-like spatial distribution with the size parameter σ = 3.08 μm − 1 . The following parameters are used: α = 1.54 μm − 1 , β = 0.06 meV · μm 2 .

Fig. 4. Evolution of the polarization textures of Ψ i − a in Fig. 3 under non-Hermitian manipulation. (a)–(c) intuitively show the change of polarized state with the increase of ρ with spatially uniform gain and loss corresponding to Figs. 3 (a) and 3 (b). (d) Poincaré sphere representation of polarization texture evolution. Coordinates S 1 , S 2 , and S 3 are three components of Stokes vectors. Point P denotes the polarization state at the red spatial point shown in (a)–(c), which locates at positions P 1 , P 2 , and P 3 when (a) ρ = 0 , (b) ρ = 0.40167 (at EP), and (c) ρ = 0.5 , respectively. (e) Polarization texture of Ψ i − a at the EP with Gaussian-enveloped gain and loss. The four small graphs on the right panels of (a)–(c) and (e) represent the intensity distribution, Stokes components S 1 , S 2 , and S 3 , respectively, while the left panels represent the polarization texture drawings. The following parameters are used: α = 1.54 μm − 1 , β = 0.06 meV · μm 2 .
![Non-Hermitian control of the second manifold states with elliptical asymmetry of the photonic potential. (a) Real and (b) imaginary parts of the eigenvalues as a function of the circular gain and loss ρ with Gaussian-like envelope. The enlarged parts of the bifurcation of the real (imaginary) part are shown in (a-1) and (a-2) [(b-1) and (b-2)]. The following parameters are used: α=1.54 μm−1, β=0.06 meV·μm2, and δ=0.15.](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 5. Non-Hermitian control of the second manifold states with elliptical asymmetry of the photonic potential. (a) Real and (b) imaginary parts of the eigenvalues as a function of the circular gain and loss ρ with Gaussian-like envelope. The enlarged parts of the bifurcation of the real (imaginary) part are shown in (a-1) and (a-2) [(b-1) and (b-2)]. The following parameters are used: α = 1.54 μm − 1 , β = 0.06 meV · μm 2 , and δ = 0.15 .

Fig. 6. Evolution of the polarization textures of Ψ 1 in Fig. 5 under the non-Hermitian manipulation. The left panels of (a)–(f) intuitively show the change of polarized state with the increase of ρ . The right panels are the four small graphs representing the intensity distribution, Stokes components S 1 , S 2 , and S 3 , respectively. The values of S 3 are uniform in (a)–(e). In (a)–(c) S 3 = 0 , while in (d) S 3 = 0.65 and (e) S 3 = 0.7 .
![Spatial distribution of the 3D vector n=(nx,ny,nz). (a)–(c) correspond to the eigenstates in Figs. 1(d), 4(b), and 1(f) of the main text, within the region of x2+y2≤0.65 μm. Each group contains a 3D map of the vector n and the 2D colored maps of nz [i.e., cos β(r)] and arctan(ny/nx) [i.e., α(θ)]. The range of arctangent values is set from –π to π to cover the 2π range of the angle α of the Poincaré sphere. Note that the parts of the graphs exceeding the range of x2+y2≤0.65 μm are out of the skyrmion structure and, therefore, do not represent proper physical meaning, which is just an extension out of the proper range to fit the square-shaped graph boundary.](/Images/icon/loading.gif)
Fig. 7. Spatial distribution of the 3D vector n = ( n x , n y , n z ) . (a)–(c) correspond to the eigenstates in Figs. 1 (d), 4 (b), and 1 (f) of the main text, within the region of x 2 + y 2 ≤ 0.65 μm . Each group contains a 3D map of the vector n and the 2D colored maps of n z [i.e., cos β ( r ) ] and arctan ( n y / n x ) [i.e., α ( θ ) ]. The range of arctangent values is set from – π to π to cover the 2 π range of the angle α of the Poincaré sphere. Note that the parts of the graphs exceeding the range of x 2 + y 2 ≤ 0.65 μm are out of the skyrmion structure and, therefore, do not represent proper physical meaning, which is just an extension out of the proper range to fit the square-shaped graph boundary.
|
Table 1. Total Angular Momentum J of the Second Excited Manifold LG Modesa

Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address