• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 5, Issue 6, B20 (2017)
Li Ge1、2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Engineering Science and Physics, College of Staten Island, CUNY, Staten Island, New York 10314, USA
  • 2The Graduate Center, CUNY, New York, New York 10016, USA (li.ge@csi.cuny.edu)
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.5.000B20 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Li Ge. Constructing the scattering matrix for optical microcavities as a nonlocal boundary value problem[J]. Photonics Research, 2017, 5(6): B20 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    We develop a numerical scheme to construct the scattering (S) matrix for optical microcavities, including the special cases with parity-time and other non-Hermitian symmetries. This scheme incorporates the explicit form of a nonlocal boundary condition, with the incident light represented by an inhomogeneous term. This approach resolves the artifact of a discontinuous normal derivative typically found in the R-matrix method. In addition, we show that, by excluding the aforementioned inhomogeneous term, the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian in our approach also determines the Periels–Kapur states, and it constitutes an alternative approach to derive the standard R-matrix result in this basis. Therefore, our scheme provides a convenient framework to explore the benefits of both approaches. We illustrate this boundary value problem using 1D and 2D scalar Helmholtz equations. The eigenvalues and poles of the S matrix calculated using our approach show good agreement with results obtained by other means.
    [x2+ϵ(x)k2]Ψ(x,k)=0,(1)

    View in Article

    Ψ(x,k)={ΨL+rLΨL+,(x<L/2)tLΨR+,(x>L/2),(2)

    View in Article

    xΨ|L=ik(2Ψ|L),(3)

    View in Article

    xΨ|R=ikΨ|R,(4)

    View in Article

    1Δ2[Ψi+12Ψi+Ψi1]+ϵik2Ψi=0,(5)

    View in Article

    Ψ0=2+iq2iqΨ1+η,(6)

    View in Article

    ΨN+1=2+iq2iqΨN,(7)

    View in Article

    Hψm=qm2ϵψm.(8)

    View in Article

    Hij=[2+2+iq2iq(δi,1+δi,N)]δij+(δi+1,j+δi1,j),(9)

    View in Article

    HΨ+F=q2ϵΨ,(10)

    View in Article

    Ψ=[H+q2ϵ]1F.(11)

    View in Article

    rL=2Ψ1(2+iq)2iq,tL=2ΨN2iq,(12)

    View in Article

    S=(rLtLtRrR),(13)

    View in Article

    Ψ=ΔLmψmψmTq2qm2F,(14)

    View in Article

    ψmTϵψn=LΔδm,n.(15)

    View in Article

    ψ(x)=ηΔLmψm(x)ψm(0)k2km2=2ikLmψm(x)ψm(0)k2km2.(16)

    View in Article

    am=1L0LϵψmΨdx=1L[ΨxψmψmxΨ]0Lk2km2.(17)

    View in Article

    Im[Ψ*xΨ]L=k(1|rL|2),rL=G+iFD,(18)

    View in Article

    Ψm=Hm(nekr)Hm(nekR)eimθ,Ψm+=Hm+(nek*r)Hm+(nek*R)eimθ,(19)

    View in Article

    Ψ>=Ψm0+mSm,m0Ψm+,(20)

    View in Article

    Ψ>r=Vm0(r)eim0θ+mSm,m0Vm+*(r)eimθ,(21)

    View in Article

    ΨNr,ν=mbmeimθν,(22)

    View in Article

    ΨNr+1,ν=mbm(1+cmΔr)eimθν,(23)

    View in Article

    ΨNr+1,ν+ΨNr,ν2=mbm(1+cmΔr2)eimθν,(24)

    View in Article

    ΨNr+1,νΨNr,νΔr=mbmcmeimθν,(25)

    View in Article

    Sm,m0=bmcmVm0δm,m0Vm+*,(26)

    View in Article

    Sm,m0=bm(1+cmΔr2)δm,m0,(27)

    View in Article

    Sm,m0=bm(1Vm0Δr2)δm,m01Vm+*Δr2.(28)

    View in Article

    bm=νΔθ2πeimθνΨNr,ν.(29)

    View in Article

    ΨNr+1,ν=νOν,νΨNr,ν+fν(m0),(30)

    View in Article

    Oν,νΔθ2πmHm+(nek*R+)Hm+(nek*R)eim(θνθν),(31)

    View in Article

    fν(m0)=(Vm0Vm0+*)Δr1Vm0+*Δr2eim0θν,(32)

    View in Article

    (H+k2ϵ)ψ+F(m0)=0.(33)

    View in Article

    ψ=(ψ1,1ψ1,Nθψ2,1ψNr,1ψNr,Nθ)T(34)

    View in Article

    Hψn=kn2ϵψn,(35)

    View in Article

    {H(μ1)Nθ+ν,(μ1)Nθ+ν=2(Δr)22(rμΔθ)2H(μ1)Nθ+ν,(μ1)Nθ+ν+1=1(rμΔθ)2H(μ1)Nθ+ν,μNθ+ν=rμ+12(Δr)2rμrμ+1,(36)

    View in Article

    Hν,ν=1(Δr)2RROν,ν.(37)

    View in Article

    ψ=(H+k2ϵ)1F(m0),(38)

    View in Article

    Sm,m0Δr0bmδm,m0.(39)

    View in Article

    ψ=ΔrΔθπR2nψnψnTk2kn2F(m0).(40)

    View in Article

    ψnTϵψn=πR2ΔrΔθδn,n,(41)

    View in Article

    systemϵΨnΨnrdrdϕ=πR2δn,n(42)

    View in Article

    Ψn|r=R=mzm(n)Ψm+|r=R=mzm(n)eimθ,(43)

    View in Article

    ψnTF(m0)=2RΔrΔθ(Vm0Vm0+*)zm0(n),(44)

    View in Article

    Sm,m0Δr02R(Vm0+*Vm0)Rm,m0δm,m0,(45)

    View in Article

    Rm,m0=nzm(n)zm0(n)k2kn2(46)

    View in Article

    an=1πR2systemϵΨnΨdx=1πRLSS[ΨrΨnΨnrΨ]Rdθk2kn2.(47)

    View in Article

    [2+ne2k2]X=0,X=Ψ,Ψn.(48)

    View in Article

    an=1πRLSS[Ψm0rΨnΨnrΨm0]Rdθk2kn2(49)

    View in Article

    rΨn|r=R=mzm(n)Vm+*eimθ,(50)

    View in Article

    Ψ(x)=2R(Vm0+*Vm0)nzm0(n)Ψn(x)k2kn2.(51)

    View in Article

    Hm+(kR)Jm+(nkR)Hm+(kR)Jm(nkR)=n.(52)

    View in Article

    vm=±()mvm(vmR),(53)

    View in Article

    vm=±()mvm(vmC).(54)

    View in Article

    Li Ge. Constructing the scattering matrix for optical microcavities as a nonlocal boundary value problem[J]. Photonics Research, 2017, 5(6): B20
    Download Citation