• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 16, Issue 9, 090501 (2018)
Dun Liu1、2、*, Shibin Wu1、**, Wei Yang1, Lihua Wang1, Bin Fan1, and Fan Wu1
Author Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Optics and Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610209, China
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL201816.090501 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Dun Liu, Shibin Wu, Wei Yang, Lihua Wang, Bin Fan, Fan Wu. Effects of mask-alignment error on point spread function for multi-level Fresnel diffractive lenses[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2018, 16(9): 090501 Copy Citation Text show less
    Surface structure of four-level in relation to the two mask patterns.
    Fig. 1. Surface structure of four-level in relation to the two mask patterns.
    Phase distribution of a four-level diffractive lens with misalignment.
    Fig. 2. Phase distribution of a four-level diffractive lens with misalignment.
    Cross-section intensity distribution of FZL with different misalignment.
    Fig. 3. Cross-section intensity distribution of FZL with different misalignment.
    Center offset with the change of misalignment.
    Fig. 4. Center offset with the change of misalignment.
    Radius of Airy disk with the change of misalignment.
    Fig. 5. Radius of Airy disk with the change of misalignment.
    PSF with the misalignment of 1.8 μm. (a) is the distribution of PSF, and (b) is the cross-section distribution in the Y direction.
    Fig. 6. PSF with the misalignment of 1.8 μm. (a) is the distribution of PSF, and (b) is the cross-section distribution in the Y direction.
    Diffraction efficiency with the change of misalignment.
    Fig. 7. Diffraction efficiency with the change of misalignment.
    (a) The micrographs of the 80 mm FZL at the outmost zones; (b) is the cross-section profile along the line in (a).
    Fig. 8. (a) The micrographs of the 80 mm FZL at the outmost zones; (b) is the cross-section profile along the line in (a).
    Depth error of the 80 mm FZL at different positions.
    Fig. 9. Depth error of the 80 mm FZL at different positions.
    Test of PSF.
    Fig. 10. Test of PSF.
    PSF of the 80 mm FZL. (a) is the test result, and (b) is the calculated result.
    Fig. 11. PSF of the 80 mm FZL. (a) is the test result, and (b) is the calculated result.
    Calculated cross-section intensity distribution of the FZL. (a) is in the X direction, and (b) is in the Y direction.
    Fig. 12. Calculated cross-section intensity distribution of the FZL. (a) is in the X direction, and (b) is in the Y direction.
     Long AxisShort AxisAngles Between Long Axis
    No.PixelsLength (μm)PixelsLength (μm)and Vertical Direction
    152.957.2850.586.952.81°
    252.467.2150.286.910.91°
    352.487.2250.856.992.37°
    452.127.1749.456.802.73°
    552.027.1550.066.884.53°
    651.857.1349.976.870.45°
    Average--7.19--6.90--
    Table 1. Parameters of the Fitted Boundary of the Airy Disks
    Dun Liu, Shibin Wu, Wei Yang, Lihua Wang, Bin Fan, Fan Wu. Effects of mask-alignment error on point spread function for multi-level Fresnel diffractive lenses[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2018, 16(9): 090501
    Download Citation