Author Affiliations
Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Optoelectronic Measurement Technology and Instrument, Beijing Information Science & Technology University, Beijing 100192, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Temperature change of the imaging device and the main board after turning on
Fig. 2. 3D model of AVT GT5120 camera
Fig. 3. Camera finite element model
Fig. 4. Camera transient thermal stress analysis results
Fig. 5. Axial offset of the camera causes the imaging optical path to change
Fig. 6. Image point drift caused by axial optical path changes
Fig. 7. Schematic diagram of image point shift caused by radial expansion
Fig. 8. Temperature changes of the experimental device and its components
Fig. 9. In the self-heating state, the coordinate value of each quadrant point after compensation is compared with the experimental measurement value
Fig. 10. Camera thermal control system
Name | Material | Young’s
modulus /GPa
| Density
/kg·m−3 | Specific heat
capacity/J·kg−1·℃
| Thermal conductivity
W·m−1·℃
| Thermal expansion
coefficient/℃−1 | Poisson ratio | Body | Aluminum alloy | 71 | 2770 | 875 | 237 | 2.3×10−5 | 0.33 | Lens tube, top plate | Copper alloy | 110 | 8300 | 385 | 401 | 1.8×10−5 | 0.34 | CMOS | Monocrystalline Silicon | 190 | 2330 | 702 | 124 | 5.0×10−7 | 0.064 | Lens housing | ABS | 2 | 880 | 1470 | 0.22 | 9.0×10−5 | 0.394 | Lens | Glass | 88 | 2500 | 750 | 1.4 | 5.8×10−7 | 0.215 |
|
Table 1. Material properties of camera components
Temperature
increasement/℃
| Lens
translation/μm
| CMOS horizontal
deformation/μm
| CMOS vertical
deformation/μm
| 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 | 4.28 | 2.61 | 2.31 | 2 | 9.61 | 5.25 | 5.28 | 3 | 14.44 | 7.52 | 8.02 | 4 | 19.76 | 9.75 | 10.04 | 5 | 24.19 | 12.61 | 13.02 | 6 | 28.89 | 15.32 | 14.89 | 7 | 32.58 | 18.32 | 17.65 |
|
Table 2. Deformation of the lens and CMOS under different temperature variation
| First quadrant error/pixel | | Second quadrant error/pixel | | Third quadrant error/pixel | | Fourth quadrant error/pixel | | Minimum | Max | Minimum | Max | Minimum | Max | Minimum | Max | Horizontal coordinate value | 0.00 | 0.09 | | 0.00 | 0.12 | | 0.00 | 0.12 | | 0.00 | 0.13 | Vertical coordinate value | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.16 |
|
Table 3. Pixel drift compensation model error
| First quadrant
error/pixel
| | Second quadrant
error/pixel
| | Third quadrant
error/pixel
| | Fourth quadrant
error/pixel
| | Minimum | Max | Minimum | Max | Minimum | Max | Minimum | Max | Thermal control device method | 0.00 | 0.20 | | 0.01 | 0.17 | | 0.02 | 0.13 | | 0.01 | 0.15 | Image point drift compensation method | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.16 |
|
Table 4. Comparison of thermal control device method and image point drift compensation method