Author Affiliations
1School of Optical and Electronic Information, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China2Hubei Shen'an Yaming Lighting Technology Co., Ltd., Tianmen, Hubei 431728, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Outline design of lampshade in LightTools. (a) Fill outline; (b) network cable outline
Fig. 2. CD pattern model. (a) Overall model of lampshade; (b) diffuser surface
Fig. 3. Comparison of CD pattern sizes. (a) Center line width is 100 um, and peripheral line width is 200 μm; (b) line width is 300 μm
Fig. 4. Ray tracing simulation of LED downlight lighting system. (a) Ray tracing of single light source; (b) ray tracing with receiver
Fig. 5. Simulation results of ray tracing. (a) Light power density distribution; (b) illumination display curve
Fig. 6. Simulation results of ray tracing at line width of 100 μm. (a) Light power density distribution; (b) illumination display curve
Fig. 7. Simulation results of ray tracing at line width of 200 μm. (a) Light power density distribution; (b) illumination display curve
Fig. 8. Simulation results of ray tracing at a line width of 300 μm. (a) Light power density distribution; (b) illumination display curve
Fig. 9. Injection molding process
Fig. 10. LIGA mold making technology process
Fig. 11. Flow chart of electroforming mold process
Fig. 12. Diagrams of CD pattern microstructure. (a) 3D outline display; (b) 2D flat display
Fig. 13. Diameter test schematic
Fig. 14. Depth test schematic
Fig. 15. Comparison of CD pattern microstructure diffuser and ordinary diffuser. (a) Microstructure diffuser; (b) general diffuser; (c) without diffuser
Fig. 16. Diffusion effect diagrams of light diffusers. (a) CD pattern microstructure diffuser; (b) general diffuser
Parameter | Number ofray tracing | Illuminationarea /(mm×mm) | Numberof mesh | Opticalmaterial | Reflectivity ofreflecting element /% |
---|
Content | 5×105 | 80×80 | 21×21 | Polycarbonate | 85 |
|
Table 1. Main parameter settings of the model
Item | Number of samples | Total power /W | Total luminous flux /lm | Incident power /W | Incident luminous flux /lm |
---|
Value1 | 270928 | 1 | 100 | 0.51322 | 51.322 | Value2 | 212082 | 1 | 100 | 0.55228 | 55.228 | Value3 | 247367 | 1 | 100 | 0.64844 | 64.844 | Value4 | 241807 | 1 | 100 | 0.60456 | 60.456 |
|
Table 2. Simulation results of LightTools
Testequipment No. | Equipment name | Type |
---|
1 | Integrating sphere | HAAS-2000 | 2 | Scanning electronmicroscope (SEM) | EM-30 PLUS | 3 | Surface probetype step meter | Dektak XT | 4 | Surface profilemeasuring instrument | PGI-830 | 5 | Laser scanningconfocal microscope | VK-X200K408 |
|
Table 3. Test equipment
Structure | Luminous flux /lm | Light effect /(lm·W-1) | Color temperature /K | Relative transmittance /% |
---|
Microstructure diffuser | 2009.8 | 95.99 | 3912 | 90.6 | General diffuser | 1815.9 | 86.75 | 3891 | 81.8 | No diffuser | 2219.7 | 105.95 | 3947 | 100 |
|
Table 4. Test data of microstructure diffuser and general diffuser