Author Affiliations
1State Key Laboratory of Mobile Network and Mobile Multimedia Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China2Wireless Product Planning Department, ZTE Corporation, Shenzhen 518055, China3School of Microelectronics, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Relationship between capacitance and voltage for GaN HEMT.
Fig. 2. (Color online) GaN HEMT: (a) transconductance gm(VGS) curves. (b) Channel transconductance gDS(VDS) curves.
Fig. 3. Parasitic source and drain access resistances of GaN HEMT.
Fig. 4. Longitudinal electric field at the source access region for different
VGS. The simulated increase in
rS is plotted in the right axis
[41].
Fig. 5. AlGaN/GaN HEMT output and transconductance characteristics at
VGS = 0 V
[47].
Fig. 6. (Color online) Pulsed
gm versus
VGS characteristics for the GaN HEMT with different quiescent bias point
[55].
Fig. 7. Frequency dispersion of output current, transconductance at quiescent large signal bias point, and gate capacitance at
VDS = 0 V
[61].
Fig. 8. (Color online) Existing mechanisms of gm reduction for the GaN HEMT.
Fig. 9. (Color online) Schematic diagram of gate and source field plate of GaN HEMT.
Fig. 10. (Color online) (a) Cross section of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs with Si-rich SiN interlayer. (b) TEM of devices with Si-rich SiN interlayer
[84].
Fig. 11. (Color online) Two-tone linearity measurement at 1 GHz with a 1-MHz spacing of the (a) proposed device and (b) conventional device. Devices are biased at
VDS = 10 V near class A
[85].
Fig. 12. (Color online) Device structure of nanowire channel HEMT
[95].
Fig. 13. (Color online) (a) Source resistance as a function of drain current density in planar and nanowire devices. Inset: measurement setup. (b) Transfer characteristics of nanowire channel and planar device
[95].
Fig. 14. (Color online) Schematic illustration of a GaN field-effect transistor with buried dual gates
[101].
Fig. 15. (Color online) (a) Schematics of laterally gated device. (b) OIP3 of planar and laterally gated devices at 3−4 GHz range
[102].
Fig. 16. (Color online) (a) Diagram of the super-lattice castellated FET structure combining a super-lattice epitaxial channel with a three-dimensional, castellated T-gate. (b) Two-tone linearity measurement at 30 GHz
[103].
Fig. 17. (Color online) Schematic of planar nanostrip GaN HEMT
[105].
Fig. 18. (Color online) (a) Schematic cross section of AlGaN/GaN PolFET with graded heterostructure. (b) Top: energy-band profiles. Bottom: electron distributions. Inset: schematic cross section of PolFETs and HEMTs structures
[107].
Fig. 19. (Color online) (a) Schematic diagram for the MOCVD-grown HEMT with a graded InGaN subchannel. (b) Two-tone linearity measurements with
f1 = 10 GHz and
f2 = 10.01 GHz biased near Class A
[111].
Fig. 20. (Color online) Cross-sectional schematic of the double-channel HEMT on the GaN on high-resistivity silicon
[117].
Fig. 21. (Color online) Illustration of device-level
gm-compensation-
for a set of five independent transistors with slight (0.2−0.3 V) offsets in threshold voltage (left). When these transistors are connected together (right), the composite
(black curve) is lowered
[30].
Fig. 22. (Color online) Schematic and SEM image of the fin device. The widths of the five fin devices are all present within the single fin device
[30].
Fig. 23. (Color online) Top-view SEM images of the fabricated device showing a planar region and a fin region under a single gate electrode
[120].
Fig. 24. (Color online) (a) TRG-HEMT structure diagram. (b) Cross section view of the TRG-HEMT along the gate width. (c) Cross section view of the TRG-HEMT along the gate length
[122].
Fig. 25. (Color online) Transfer characteristics of the AlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMTs with 20 nm SiN and 60 nm PZT at
VDS = 10 V
[123].
Fig. 26. (Color online) Schematic cross section of the AlGaN/GaN HEMT with a dual-gate structure
[129].
Fig. 27. (Color online) Cross-sectional view of dual gate ferroelectric GaN HEMT
[130].
Fig. 28. (Color online) Reported GVS and peak gm of recent improvement methods for the GaN HEMT.
Fig. 29. (Color online) Reported results of two-tone linearity measurement of recent improvement methods for the GaN HEMT.
Types | Mechanisms | Challenges |
---|
Trapping suppression | Reduce the electric field;eliminate the sources of the traps;keep the 2DEG from the traps | Mostly have no ability to further improvethe GVS | Nanowire channel (fin structure/tri-gate) | Effectively suppress the increasing of rS due to the large current drivability | Extra parasitic gate capacitance;loss of the output current;etching damage risk | Graded channel (PolFET with 3DEG) | Maintain the stable electron volume to suppress scattering | Low peak gm;complex epitaxy process of the graded channel | Double channel | Reduce perpendicular electric field;electron compensation between double channel | Multiple epitaxy of the double channel | gm compensation | Different gm compensated with each other | Precise design for threshold voltage;hard process control for stable threshold | Ferroelectric dielectric/N-polar hetero-structure | Nonlinear polarization effect of PZT / improvement of electron confinement | Tough epitaxy growth of N-polar | Double gate | Alleviate the electric field | Low peak gm |
|
Table 1. Features of reported improvement methods for nonlinear gm.