Author Affiliations
1 School of Computer Science and Technology, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, Sichuan 621010, China2 Institute of Applied Electronics, Chinese Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang, Sichuan 621900, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Principle of topography measurement system with relative angle difference. (a) Top view of measurement system; (b) diagram of catwalk measurement
Fig. 2. Laser spot array obtained by CCD
Fig. 3. Schematic for scanning process on measured surface
Fig. 4. Reconstruction results with Gaussian noise (σ=0.2″). (a) Simulated surface to be tested; (b) reconstruction with CuRe method; (c) reconstruction with Zernike wavefront
Fig. 5. Two different curved surfaces for simulation. (a) Z1; (b) Z2
Fig. 6. Comparison of reconstructed surface Z1 and residual errors with Gaussian noise (σ=0.2″). (a) Reconstruction result with proposed method; (b) reconstruction result with Zernike wavefront method; (c) reconstruction result with SLI method; (d) reconstructed residual error of proposed method; (e) reconstructed residual error of Zernike wavefront method; (f) reconstructed residual error of SLI method
Fig. 7. Comparison of reconstructed surface Z2 and residual errors with Gaussian noise (σ=0.2″). (a) Reconstruction result with proposed method; (b) reconstruction result with Zernike wavefront method; (c) reconstruction result with SLI method; (d) residual error of proposed method; (e) residual error of Zernike wavefront method; (f) residual error of SLI method
Fig. 8. Reconstruction error statistics at different noise levels (σ=0-1 μrad). (a) 200 mm×200 mm, 17×17 sampling points; (b) 200 mm×200 mm, 34×34 sampling points; (c) 400 mm×400 mm, 34×34 sampling points
Fig. 9. Four repeated test results for small aperture optical component. (a) Topography measured by interferometer; (b)-(e) reconstruction results of proposed method; (f)-(i) reconstruction results with Zernike wavefront method
Fig. 10. Two repeated test results for large aperture optical component. (a)(d) Topographies measured by interferometer; (b)(e) reconstruction results of proposed method; (c)(f) reconstruction results with Zernike wavefront method
Fig. 11. Comparison of corresponding rows between reconstruction results of proposed method and topographies measured by interferometer. (a) y=75 mm; (b) y=175 mm
Algorithm | Small aperture mirror (RMSE) /μm | Large aperture mirror (RMSE) /μm |
---|
Test 1 | Test 2 | Test 3 | Test 4 | | Test 1 | Test 2 |
---|
Zernike wavefront | 0.5733 | 0.4915 | 0.5072 | 0.7305 | 0.9436 | 0.0793 | Proposed | 0.0638 | 0.0711 | 0.0674 | 0.0644 | 0.0351 | 0.0246 |
|
Table 1. RMSE statistics of repeated test for two different mirrors