Abstract
1. Introduction
A single photon emitter (SPE) is a device which either emits a single photon on demand or emits entangled photons at a relatively high repetition frequency [
It is generally believed that a cold atom is naturally a single photon source[
Many studies have focused on SPEs, but as yet a perfect triggerable high purity, bright and indistinguishable SPE has not been proposed, especially one operating at room temperature. Amongst all the potential central blocks to build an optimal SPE, semiconductor single QD SPE systems have been studied for nearly two decades and have recently been proved to outperform the long-applied SPEs based on spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC)[
2. Several fundamental features of SPEs
2.1. Purity and Indistinguishability
An ideal single photon emitter should, at a given time, emit one photon or an entangled photon pair with a certain repetition rate, which can be characterized by the aforementioned second-order intensity correlation function
Figure 1.(Color online) (a) Schematic diagram of the system used to perform general QDs micro-photoluminescence spectroscopy. (b) HBT experiment set-up. (c) HOM experiment set-up. (d) Examples of HBT experiment, reproduced from Ref. [
where
where
2.2. Brightness and Scalability
There are several descriptions to explain brightness in SPEs various from literature and different applications[
2.3. Single entangled photon-pair generation
The famous EPR paper left us with many legacies, one of which stands at an intriguing position in quantum physics – the entanglement[
All the above conditions form a blueprint for an optimal SPE. There are also other desirable needs to be considered such as room temperature operation. In the following sections we examine SPEs in III–V compounds in detail and discuss their single photon emission properties from the point of view of material and physical considerations.
3. Single photon emission with III–V compounds
3.1. III–asenides
3.1.1. QD growth
In III–V compounds such as GaAs, InP and InAs, the different lattice parameters of the constituent components result in a lattice mismatch and strain at the interface[
3.1.2. Material properties
The atom-like discrete nature of the energy levels generates promising interband transitions and is ascribed to the origin of single photon emission from QDs. As in the simplest picture of the energy levels shown in Fig. 2, electrons with spin –1/2 and heavy holes with spin –3/2 populate the conduction band (with s-like orbital symmetry) and valence band (with p-like symmetry), respectively. Light holes are neglected in this picture because they are pushed down in energy due to the confinement energy scales inversely with mass. Transitions are allowed when the overall symmetry of the two states are different, such as the transition (p,S) ←→ (s,S), denoted with 1X. Excitons are formed due to Coulomb interactions between the carriers. The so-called dark excitons in contrast with bright ones cannot recombine optically due to quantum selection rules. The transition (p,S) ←→ (s,P) is not allowed [
Figure 2.(Color online) Simplified schemes of optical transitions from different single photon sources. (a) Electron and hole confined states in a QD. The left indices show the band and envelope orbital symmetries, respectively. The right indices indicate the spin states. (b) Electron and hole confined states in a bigger QD compared with (a). Excitons and biexcitons are indicated. It should be noted that only absorption is illustrated in (a) and (b).
Non-resonant excitation creates many electron-hole pairs in the material matrix surrounding the QDs, which then relax to the lowest energy confined states in the QDs[
3.1.3. Single photons from GaAs based dots
Emission from single III-As QDs was initially demonstrated using photoluminiscence in 1994[
Figure 3.(Color online) (a) Image of the bright spots showing individual QDs taken with an InGaAs camera and spectrum of the QD circled in a with exciton (X), biexciton (XX), positively charged exciton (X+) and negatively charged exciton (X-) labelled[
3.1.4. Coupling with cavities
It is worth mentioning that the SPE brightness for III-As QDs can generally be modified and controlled by placing mirrors or conductors around the source, hence causing the density of states of the vacuum fluctuations to change. Above we just discussed the coupling with DBRs[
Figure 4.(Color online) (a) Simulation of the electromagnetic field of a crystal photonic waveguide. (b) Microstructure of a bull’s eye cavity and simulation of the single-photon extraction efficiency and Purcell factor as a function of photon emission wavelength of the cavity. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [
3.1.5. Generation of entangled photons
In a similar manner to the general SPE that we just discussed above, generating entangled photons also requires that several conditions are met, including on-demand generation, high indistinguishability and high extraction efficiency (here efficiency extends to the product of extraction efficiency and pair generation efficiency). The source should produce maximally entangled Bell states, characterised by the fidelity. Very recently, following the fabrication of deterministic high symmetry QDs devices[
All the above discussions are summarized in Table 1 generated from Fig. 5 . State of the art technique allows for the production of SPEs with simultaneously high brightness, purity and indistinguishability. There are two exceptions worth mentioning, as i) the general trend is that both the single photon purity and indistinguishability decrease with increasing brightness as indicated by the red-dotted simulated line. The work of Schweickert et al. is an exception in that they greatly reduced the dark current[
Figure 5.(Color online) Purity and indistinguishability as a function of brightness summarized from Table1 with a trend indicated by red-dotted lines. Red triangles are non-resonant excitation while black squares are SPEs with resonant excitation. The blue circle is from hBN and the light blue squares are photon-pair SPEs.
Table Infomation Is Not EnableFigure 6.(Color online) (a) Schematics of a LPCVD setup to produce hBN film where ammonia borane is used as a CVD precursor. (b) A confocal PL map showing hBN luminescence. (c) hBN single photon measurement with
3.1.6. Deterministic fabrication of SPEs
When considering scalability of SPE integrated systems, the light emitter has to be placed at the antinode of the cavity, which also increases the device efficiency. The main issue then becomes how to couple the generated photons into well-defined spatial modes and out of the solid state cavity quantum electrodynamic devices[
3.2. III-nitrides
Single photon emission can be realized in the III-nitride system with the formation of QDs making use of the 3-dimensional barriers that can be created by contrasting the potentials of different nitride alloys such as AlN, AlGaN, GaN, InGaN, and InN. Due to the extensive use of GaN in the lighting and diode laser industry, its associated fabrication techniques have thus advanced at a tremendous rate. This mass adoption of LED lighting has seen the price of the technology benefit from the economies of scale. In terms of the industrial maturity for large scale production, nitride technology is more readily scalable compared to other single photon emitters using exotic materials and techniques such as single trapped atoms[
Scalability aside, there are a number of major advantages of nitride based single photon emitters, namely temperature stability, polarisability, and wide tuneability. III-nitride materials have been reported to give single photon emission at room temperature owing to the wide band offsets which are available between different nitride alloys, preventing carrier escape from a QD. The tuneablity of emission ranges from the UV down to the red side of the visible electromagnetic spectrum via bandgap engineering and QD size control. Typically UV single photons are produced by GaN QDs in AlGaN or AlN with photon energies up to
3.2.1. Material properties
The majority of III-nitride emitters studied exhibit Wurtzite symmetry, which is non-centrosymmetric. The P63mc space group gives rise to a strong piezoelectric field when the crystal is under compressive or tensile strain. Lattice mismatch between the lower bandgap QD material and the higher bandgap barrier material causes large peizoelectric fields in the QD, giving rise to the quantum confined Stark effect, polarising the electrons and holes. As a consequence, there is reduced electron-hole wavefunction overlap which substantially decreases the radiative recombination rate of the system. The long emission lifetimes of a single photon emitter limits the speed at which these single photons can be generated. For extreme cases, lifetimes in excess of
3.2.2. Single photons from GaN based dots
There are many schemes of growing QDs in the nitride systems. The first nitride single photon emitter was grown in the SK growth mode with MOVPE demonstrated by Kako et al.[
3.2.3. Temperature stability
The large band offsets and strong carrier confinement nature of III-nitride QDs enables large potential barriers to be formed to prevent carrier escape from a QD. Very early on, Kako et al. had already highlighted this by the successful demonstration of single photon emission with a
3.2.4. Polarisability
Nitride QDs have regularly been reported to give a linearly polarised emission[
Lundskog et al. demonstrated precise site control of QD emission polarization by growing InGaN QDs on top of hexagonal GaN pyramids in which the apex were elongated[
3.3. hBN-base SPEs
hBN, which is a layered semiconductor with a wide band gap of 5.5 eV, has also been reported to be a single photon source[
4. Conclusions and outlook
In this paper, we have reviewed the various aspects of III–V compound SPEs, concentrating on III-arsenides, III-nitrides and hBN based SPEs. InGaAs QDs based SPEs have already achieved high purity, high brightness and high indistinguishability, simultaneously, and even recently high fidelity for photon-pair generation. Great progress has also been made towards the development of III-nitrides as single photon emitters at elevated temperatures and also ones based on hBN in recent years. This has arisen from collaborative research of many groups spread out across the world. Advances have been made in particular with respect to high temperature operation and single photon emission covering the main communication spectrum from 800 to 1550 nm[
Scalability is the next major criterion for the development of SPEs, with the key performance metrics of brightness, indistinguishability and purity have errors below 1% or so. In particularly one may consider chip-based photonics as it offers crucial advantages in terms of stability and portability[
We spent most of the paper discuss about single photons from one source. However perspective quantum repeater scenarios process single photon interference from remote quantum nodes[
The crystallographic and electronic structure and origin of the hBN defect is still under debate. Much more effort is required to improve the growth of III-nitrides and 2D materials, particularly in attempts to control identical QDs and spectrally stable defects[
References
[1]
[2] K Hennessy, A Badolato, M Winger et al. Quantum nature of a strongly coupled single quantum dot–cavity system. Nature, 445, 896(2007).
[3] A W Harrow, A Montanaro. Quantum computational supremacy. Nature, 549, 203(2017).
[4] L Hu, S H Wu, W Cai et al. Quantum generative adversarial learning in a superconducting quantum circuit. Sci Adv, 5, eaav2761(2019).
[5] X Qiang, X Zhou, J Wang et al. Large-scale silicon quantum photonics implementing arbitrary two-qubit processing. Nat Photonics, 12, 534(2018).
[6] P Kok, W J Munro, K Nemoto et al. Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits. Rev Mod Phys, 79, 135(2007).
[7] V Giovannetti, S Lloyd, L Maccone. Advances in quantum metrology. Nat Photonics, 5, 222(2011).
[8] M C Chen, C Liu, Y H Luo et al. Experimental demonstration of quantum pigeonhole paradox. PNAS; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116, 1549(2019).
[9] S K Liao, W Q Cai, J Handsteiner et al. Satellite-relayed intercontinental quantum network. Phys Rev Lett, 120, 030501(2018).
[10] A Kuhn, M Hennrich, G Rempe. Deterministic single-photon source for distributed quantum networking. Phys Rev Lett, 89, 067901(2002).
[11] S Chu. Cold atoms and quantum control. Nature, 416, 206(2002).
[12] S Haroche, D Kleppner. Cavity quantum electrodynamics. Phys Today, 42, 24(1989).
[13] E K Dietsche, A Larrouy, S Haroche et al. High-sensitivity magnetometry with a single atom in a superposition of two circular rydberg states. Nat Phys, 15, 326(2019).
[14] P O Schmidt, T Rosenband, C Langer et al. Spectroscopy using quantum logic. Science, 309, 749(2005).
[15] M Almendros, J Huwer, N Piro et al. Bandwidthtunable single-photon source in an ion-trap quantum network. Phys Rev Lett, 103, 213601(2009).
[16] D B Higginbottom, L Slodička, G Araneda et al. Pure single photons from a trapped atom source. New J Phys, 18, 093038(2016).
[17] P Senellart, G Solomon, A White. High-performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources. Nat Nanotechnol, 12, 1026(2017).
[18] J Benedikter, H Kaupp, T Hümmer et al. Cavity-enhanced single-photon source based on the silicon-vacancy center in diamond. Phys Rev Appl, 7, 024031(2017).
[19] B Lounis, W E Moerner. Single photons on demand from a single molecule at room temperature. Nature, 407, 491(2000).
[20] T T Tran, K Bray, M J Ford et al. Quantum emission from hexagonal boron nitride monolayers. Nat Nanotechnol, 11, 37(2015).
[21] Y M He, G Clark, J R Schaibley et al. Single quantum emitters in monolayer semiconductors. Nat Nanotechnol, 10, 497(2015).
[22] C Chakraborty, L Kinnischtzke, K M Goodfellow et al. Voltage-controlled quantum light from an atomically thin semiconductor. Nat Nanotechnol, 10, 507(2015).
[23] X Wang, J A Alexander-Webber, W Jia et al. Quantum dot-like excitonic behavior in individual single walled-carbon nanotubes. Sci Rep, 6, 37167(2016).
[24] X He, H Htoon, S K Doorn et al. Carbon nanotubes as emerging quantum-light sources. Nat Mater, 17, 663(2018).
[25] X Ding, Y He, Z C Duan et al. On-demand single photons with high extraction efficiency and near-unity indistinguishability from a resonantly driven quantum dot in a micropillar. Phys Rev Lett, 116, 020401(2016).
[26] N Somaschi, V Giesz, L De Santis et al. Near-optimal single-photon sources in the solid state. Nat Photonics, 10, 340(2016).
[27] D Gammon, E S Snow, B V Shanabrook et al. Homogeneous linewidths in the optical spectrum of a single gallium arsenide quantum dot. Science, 273, 87(1996).
[28] J H Rice, J W Robinson, J H Na et al. Biexciton and exciton dynamics in single ingan quantum dots. Nanotechnology, 16, 1477(2005).
[29] A J Shields. Semiconductor quantum light sources. Nat Photonics, 1, 215(2007).
[30] A D Andreev, E P O’Reilly. Optical transitions and radiative lifetime in gan/aln self-organized quantum dots. Appl Phys Lett, 79, 521(2001).
[31] K H Lee, F S F Brossard, M Hadjipanayi et al. Towards registered single quantum dot photonic devices. Nanotechnology, 19, 455307(2008).
[32] E Schöll, L Hanschke, L Schweickert et al. Resonance fluorescence of gaas quantum dots with near-unity photon indistinguishability. Nano Lett, 19, 2404(2019).
[33] T Miyazawa, K Takemoto, Y Sakuma et al. Single-photon generation in the 1.55-μm optical-fiber band from an inas/inp quantum dot. Jpn J Appl Phys, 44, L620(2005).
[34] A J Fotue, S C Kenfack, N Issofa et al. Energy levels of magneto-optical polaron in spherical quantum dot — part 1: Strong coupling. J Semicond, 36, 092001(2015).
[35] P Michler, A Imamoğlu, M D Mason et al. Quantum correlation among photons from a single quantum dot at room temperature. Nature, 406, 968(2000).
[36] B Mahler, P Spinicelli, S Buil et al. Towards non-blinking colloidal quantum dots. Nat Mater, 7, 659(2008).
[37] P K Shandilya, J E Fröch, M Mitchell et al. Hexagonal boron nitride cavity optomechanics. Nano Lett, 19, 1343(2019).
[38] R H Brown, R Q Twiss. Interferometry of the intensity fluctuations in light. I. basic theory: the correlation between photons in coherent beams of radiation. Proc R Soc A, 242, 300(1957).
[39] T Wang, T J Puchtler, T Zhu et al. Polarisation-controlled single photon emission at high temperatures from InGaN quantum dots. Nanoscale, 9, 9421(2017).
[40] V Giesz, O Gazzano, A K Nowak et al. Influence of the purcell effect on the purity of bright single photon sources. Appl Phys Lett, 103, 033113(2013).
[41] E B Flagg, S V Polyakov, T Thomay et al. Dynamics of nonclassical light from a single solid-state quantum emitter. Phys Rev Lett, 109, 163601(2012).
[42] K A Fischer, K Müller, K G Lagoudakis et al. Dynamical modeling of pulsed two-photon interference. New J Phys, 18, 113053(2016).
[43] C K Hong, Z Y Ou, L Mandel. Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference. Phys Rev Lett, 59, 2044(1987).
[44] X L Wang, X D Cai, Z E Su et al. Quantum teleportation of multiple degrees of freedom of a single photon. Nature, 518, 516(2015).
[45] S Aaronson, A Arkhipov. The computational complexity of linear optics. Theor Comput, 9, 143(2013).
[46]
[47] F Liu, A J Brash, J O’Hara et al. High purcell factor generation of indistinguishable on-chip single photons. Nat Nanotechnol, 13, 835(2018).
[48] M Munsch, NS Malik, E Dupuy et al. Dielectric GaAs antenna ensuring an efficient broadband coupling between an InAs quantum dot and a gaussian optical beam. Phys Rev Lett, 110, 177402(2013).
[49] J Claudon, J Bleuse, N S Malik et al. A highly efficient single-photon source based on a quantum dot in a photonic nanowire. Nat Photonics, 4, 174(2010).
[50] M Gschrey, A Thoma, P Schnauber et al. Highly indistinguishable photons from deterministic quantum-dot microlenses utilizing three dimensional in situ electron-beam lithography. Nat Commun, 6, 7662(2015).
[51] L Sapienza, M Davanço, A Badolato et al. Nanoscale optical positioning of single quantum dots for bright and pure single-photon emission. Nat Commun, 6, 7833(2015).
[52] O Gazzano, S Michaelis de Vasconcellos, C Arnold et al. Bright solid-state sources of indistinguishable single photons. Nat Commun, 4, 1425(2013).
[53] S Unsleber, Y M He, S Gerhardt et al. Highly indistinguishable on-demand resonance fluorescence photons from a deterministic quantum dot micropillar device with 74% extraction efficiency. Opt Express, 24, 8539(2016).
[54] A Einstein, B Podolsky, N Rosen. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete. Phys Rev, 47, 777(1935).
[55] H J Briegel, W Dür, J I Cirac et al. Quantum repeaters: The role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication. Phys Rev Lett, 81, 5932(1998).
[56] C H Bennett, G Brassard, C Crépeau et al. Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and einstein-podolsky-rosen channels. Phys Rev Lett, 70, 1895(1993).
[57] R Raussendorf, H J Briegel. A one-way quantum computer. Phys Rev Lett, 86, 5188(2001).
[58] U L Andersen, T C Ralph. High-fidelity teleportation of continuous-variable quantum states using delocalized single photons. Phys Rev Lett, 111, 050504(2013).
[59] L Goldstein, F Glas, J Y Marzin et al. Growth by molecular beam epitaxy and characterization of InAs/GaAs strainedlayer superlattices. Appl Phys Lett, 47, 1099(1985).
[60] E Clarke, P Spencer, E Harbord et al. optical properties and device characterisation of InAs/GaAs quantum dot bilayers. J Phys Conf Ser, 107, 012003(2008).
[61] T Konishi, E Clarke, C W Burrows et al. Spatial regularity of InAs-GaAs quantum dots: quantifying the dependence of lateral ordering on growth rate. Sci Rep, 7, 42606(2017).
[62] S Haffouz, K D Zeuner, D Dalacu et al. Bright single inasp quantum dots at telecom wavelengths in position-controlled inp nanowires: The role of the photonic waveguide. Nano Lett, 18, 3047(2018).
[63] L Schweickert, K D Jöns, K D Zeuner et al. On-demand generation of background-free single photons from a solid-state source. Appl Phys Lett, 112, 093106(2018).
[64] D Huber, M Reindl, Y Huo et al. Highly indistinguishable and strongly entangled photons from symmetric gaas quantum dots. Nat Commun, 8, 15506(2017).
[65] B Patton, W Langbein, U Woggon et al. Trion, biexciton, and exciton dynamics in single self-assembled CdSe quantum dots. Phys Rev B, 68, 125316(2003).
[66] S L Portalupi, G Hornecker, V Giesz et al. Bright phonon-tuned single-photon source. Nano Lett, 15, 6290(2015).
[67] C Santori, D Fattal, J Vuckovic et al. Single-photon generation with InAs quantum dots. New J Phys, 6, 89(2004).
[68] J Y Marzin. Photoluminescence of single inas quantum dots obtained by self-organized growth on GaAs. Phys Rev Lett, 73, 716(1994).
[69] S Fafard, D Leonard, J L Merz et al. Selective excitation of the photoluminescence and the energy levels of ultrasmall InGaAs/GaAs quantum dots. Appl Phys Lett, 65, 1388(1994).
[70] P Michler, A Kiraz, C Becher et al. A quantum dot single-photon turnstile device. Science, 290, 2282(2000).
[71] H Benisty, H De Neve, C Weisbuch. Impact of planar microcavity effects on light extraction – part ii: selected exact simulations and role of photon recycling. IEEE J Quantum Electron, 34, 1632(1998).
[72] V Giesz, S L Portalupi, T Grange et al. Cavity-enhanced two-photon interference using remote quantum dot sources. Phys Rev B, 92, 161302(2015).
[73] H Wang, Z C Duan, Y H Li et al. Near-transform-limited single photons from an efficient solid-state quantum emitter. Phys Rev Lett, 116, 213601(2016).
[74]
[75] T Müller, J Skiba-Szymanska, A B Krysa et al. A quantum light-emitting diode for the standard telecom window around 1550 nm. Nat Commun, 9, 862(2018).
[76] C Santori, D Fattal, J Vučković et al. Indistinguishable photons from a single-photon device. Nature, 419, 594(2002).
[77] L Hanschke, K A Fischer, S Appel et al. Quantum dot single-photon sources with ultra-low multi-photon probability. npj Quantum Inform, 4, 1(2018).
[78] S Fischbach, A Kaganskiy, E B Y Tauscher et al. Efficient single-photon source based on a deterministically fabricated single quantum dot-microstructure with backside gold mirror. Appl Phys Lett, 111, 011106(2017).
[79] K Tanaka, T Nakamura, W Takamatsu et al. Cavity-induced changes of spontaneous emission lifetime in one-dimensional semiconductor microcavities. Phys Rev Lett, 74, 3380(1995).
[80] M Bayer, T L Reinecke, F Weidner et al. Inhibition and enhancement of the spontaneous emission of quantum dots in structured microresonators. Phys Rev Lett, 86, 3168(2001).
[81] E Peter, P Senellart, D Martrou et al. Exciton-photon strong-coupling regime for a single quantum dot embedded in a microcavity. Phys Rev Lett, 95, 067401(2005).
[82] E M Purcell. Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies. NATO ASI Series, 839(1995).
[83] R J Thompson, Q A Turchette, O Carnal et al. Nonlinear spectroscopy in the strong-coupling regime of cavity qed. Phys Rev A, 57, 3084(1998).
[84]
[85] H Wang, H Hu, T H Chung et al. On-demand semiconductor source of entangled photons which simultaneously has high fidelity, efficiency and indistinguishability. Phys Rev Lett, 122, 113602(2019).
[86] L P Nuttall, F S F Brossard, S A Lennon et al. Optical fabrication and characterisation of su-8 disk photonic waveguide heterostructure cavities. Opt Express, 25, 24615(2017).
[87] T H Chung, G Juska, S T Moroni et al. Selective carrier injection into patterned arrays of pyramidal quantum dots for entangled photon light-emitting diodes. Nat Photonics, 10, 782(2016).
[88] Y H Huo, A Rastelli, O G Schmidt. Ultra-small excitonic fine structure splitting in highly symmetric quantum dots on gaas (001) substrate. Appl Phys Lett, 102, 152105(2013).
[89] Y Chen, M Zopf, R Keil et al. Highly-efficient extraction of entangled photons from quantum dots using a broadband optical antenna. Nat Commun, 9, 2994(2018).
[90] J Liu, R Su, Y Wei et al. A solid-state source of strongly entangled photon pairs with high brightness and indistinguishability. Nat Nanotechnol, 14, 586(2019).
[91] Y Yamamoto, R E Slusher. Optical processes in microcavities. Phys Today, 46, 66(1993).
[92] X Guo, X Zhou, J H Wang et al. Critical surface phase of 2(2Œ4) reconstructed zig-zag chains on inas(001). Thin Solid Films, 562, 326(2014).
[93] M Gschrey, F Gericke, A Schüßler et al. In situ electron-beam lithography of deterministic single-quantum-dot mesa-structures using low-temperature cathodoluminescence spectroscopy. Appl Phys Lett, 102, 251113(2013).
[94] A Dousse, L Lanco, J Suffczyński et al. Controlled light-matter coupling for a single quantum dot embedded in a pillar microcavity using farfield optical lithography. Phys Rev Lett, 101, 267404(2008).
[95] C Kistner, T Heindel, C Schneider et al. Demonstration of strong coupling via electro-optical tuning in high-quality QD-micropillar systems. Opt Express, 16, 15006(2008).
[96] T Kojima, K Kojima, T Asano et al. Accurate alignment of a photonic crystal nanocavity with an embedded quantum dot based on optical microscopic photoluminescence imaging. Appl Phys Lett, 102, 011110(2013).
[97] A Badolato, K Hennessy, M Atatüre et al. Deterministic coupling of single quantum dots to single nanocavity modes. Science, 308, 1158(2005).
[98] S M Thon, M T Rakher, H Kim et al. Strong coupling through optical positioning of a quantum dot in a photonic crystal cavity. Appl Phys Lett, 94, 111115(2009).
[99] M Notomi. Manipulating light with strongly modulated photonic crystals. Rep Prog Phys, 73, 096501(2010).
[100] M Hijlkema, B Weber, H P Specht et al. A single-photon server with just one atom. Nat Phys, 3, 253(2007).
[101] C Kurtsiefer, S Mayer, P Zarda et al. Stable solid-state source of single photons. Phys Rev Lett, 85, 290(2000).
[102] M J Holmes, K Choi, S Kako et al. Room-temperature triggered single photon emission from a III–nitride site-controlled nanowire quantum dot. Nano Lett, 14, 982(2014).
[103] A F Jarjour, R A Taylor, R A Oliver et al. Cavity-enhanced blue singlephoton emission from a single InGaN/GaN quantum dot. Appl Phys Lett, 91, 052101(2007).
[104] S Deshpande, T Frost, A Hazari et al. Electrically pumped single-photon emission at room temperature from a single InGaN/GaN quantum dot. Appl Phys Lett, 105, 14(2014).
[105] A Jarjour, R Oliver, A Tahraoui et al. Control of the oscillator strength of the exciton in a single InGaN-GaN quantum dot. Phys Rev Lett, 99, 197403(2007).
[106] B P Reid, C Kocher, T Zhu et al. Non-polar InGaN quantum dot emission with crystal-axis oriented linear polarization. Appl Phys Lett, 106, 17(2015).
[107] T Wang, T J Puchtler, S K Patra et al. Direct generation of linearly polarized single photons with a deterministic axis in quantum dots. Nanophotonics, 6, 1175(2017).
[108] E Waks, K Inoue, C Santori et al. Quantum cryptography with a photon turnstile device. Extended Abstracts of the 2002 International Conference on Solid State Devices and Materials(2002).
[109] T Bretagnon, P Lefebvre, P Valvin et al. Radiative lifetime of a single electron-hole pair in GaN/AlN quantum dots. Phys Rev B, 73, 113304(2006).
[110] B P L Reid, T Zhu, C C S Chan et al. High temperature stability in non-polar (110) InGaN quantum dots: Exciton and biexciton dynamics. Phys Status Solidi C, 11, 702(2014).
[111] S Kako, C Santori, K Hoshino et al. A gallium nitride single-photon source operating at 200 K. Nat Mater, 5, 887(2006).
[112] M Arita, F Le Roux, M J Holmes et al. Ultraclean single photon emission from a gan quantum dot. Nano Lett, 17, 2902(2017).
[113] M J Holmes, S Kako, K Choi et al. Single photons from a hot solid-state emitter at 350 K. ACS Photonics, 3, 543(2016).
[114] Y Zhou, Z Wang, A Rasmita et al. Room temperature solid-state quantum emitters in the telecom range. Sci Adv, 4, eaar3580(2018).
[115] S K Patra, T Wang, T J Puchtler et al. Theoretical and experimental analysis of radiative recombination lifetimes in nonpolar InGaN/GaN quantum dots. Phys Status Solidi B, 254, 8(2017).
[116] Ž Ga, M Holmes, E Chernysheva et al. Emission of linearly polarized single photons from quantum dots contained in nonpolar. semipolar and polar sections of pencil-like InGaN/GaN nanowires. ACS Photonics, 4, 657(2017).
[117] C Kindel, S Kako, T Kawano et al. Collinear polarization of exciton/biexciton photoluminescence from single hexagonal GaN quantum dots. Jpn J Appl Phys, 48, 04C116(2009).
[118] S Sergent, S Kako, M Burger et al. Polarization properties of single zinc-blende GaN/AlN quantum dots. Phys Rev B, 90, 235312(2014).
[119] A Lundskog, C W Hsu, K Fredrik Karlsson et al. Direct generation of linearly polarized photon emission with designated orientations from site-controlled ingan quantum dots. Light: Sci Appl, 3, e139(2014).
[120] C Teng, L Zhang, T A Hill et al. Elliptical quantum dots as on-demandsingle photons sources with deterministic polarizationstates. Appl Phys Lett, 107, 191105(2015).
[121] T J Puchtler, T Wang, C X Ren et al. Single-photon emission from m-plane InGaN quantum dots on GaN nanowires. Nano Lett, 16, 7779(2016).
[122] C C Kocher, T J Puchtler, J C Jarman et al. Highly polarized electrically driven single-photon emission from a non-polar InGaN quantum dot. Appl Phys Lett, 111, 251108(2017).
[123] N Mendelson, ZQ Xu, T T Tran et al. Engineering and tuning of quantum emitters in few-layer hexagonal boron nitride. ACS Nano, 13, 3132(2019).
[124] R Bourrellier, S Meuret, A Tararan et al. Bright uv single photon emission at point defects in h-BN. Nano Lett, 16, 4317(2016).
[125] L J Martínez, T Pelini, V Waselowski et al. Efficient single photon emission from a high-purity hexagonal boron nitride crystal. Phys Rev B, 94, 121405(2016).
[126] T Vogl, G Campbell, B C Buchler et al. Fabrication and deterministic transfer of high-quality quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride. ACS Photonics, 5, 2305(2018).
[127] A Kumar, T Low, K H Fung et al. Tunable light–matter interaction and the role of hyperbolicity in graphene–hbn system. Nano Lett, 15, 3172(2015).
[128] S A Tawfik, S Ali, M Fronzi et al. Firstprinciples investigation of quantum emission from hbn defects. Nanoscale, 9, 13575(2017).
[129] Y N Vil’k, V D Chupov, V E Shvaiko-Shvaikovskii et al. A theoretical analysis of the formation of nonstoichiometric defects in hexagonal boron nitride. Refract Ind Ceram, 42, 146(2001).
[130] G Grosso, H Moon, B Lienhard et al. Tunable and high-purity room temperature single-photon emission from atomic defects in hexagonal boron nitride. Nat Commun, 8, 705(2017).
[131] T T Tran, C Elbadawi, D Totonjian et al. Robust multicolor single photon emission from point defects in hexagonal boron nitride. ACS Nano, 10, 7331(2016).
[132] M Jana, R N Singh. Progress in cvd synthesis of layered hexagonal boron nitride with tunable properties and their applications. Int Mater Rev, 63, 162(2017).
[133] J C Loredo, N A Zakaria, N Somaschi et al. Scalable performance in solid-state single-photon sources. Optica, 3, 433(2016).
[134]
[135] N Sangouard, C Simon, H de Riedmatten et al. Quantum repeaters based on atomic ensembles and linear optics. Rev Mod Phys, 83, 33(2011).
[136] J H Weber, B Kambs, J Kettler et al. Two photon interference in the telecom c-band after frequency conversion of photons from remote quantum emitters. Nat Nanotechnol, 14, 23(2019).
[137] J C Loredo, M A Broome, P Hilaire et al. Boson sampling with single-photon fock states from a bright solid-state source. Phys Rev Lett, 118, 130503(2017).
[138] Y He, X Ding, Z E Su et al. Time-bin-encoded boson sampling with a single-photon device. Phys Rev Lett, 118, 190501(2017).
[139] D E Chang, J I Cirac, H J Kimble. Self-organization of atoms along a nanophotonic waveguide. Phys Rev Lett, 110, 113606(2013).
[140] J H Cho, Y M Kim, S H Lim et al. Strongly coherent single-photon emission from site-controlled ingan quantum dots embedded in GaN nanopyramids. ACS Photonics, 5, 439(2018).
[141] C Carmesin, F Olbrich, T Mehrtens et al. Structural and optical properties of InAs/(In)GaAs/GaAs quantum dots with single-photon emission in the telecom c-band up to 77 K. Phys Rev B, 98, 125407(2018).
Set citation alerts for the article
Please enter your email address