• Journal of Semiconductors
  • Vol. 42, Issue 5, 051001 (2021)
Enqing Zhang1、2, Zhengkun Xing1、2, Dian Wan1、2, Haoran Gao1、2, Yingdong Han1、2, Yisheng Gao3, Haofeng Hu1、2, Zhenzhou Cheng1、2、4, and Tiegen Liu1、2
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Precision Instruments and Opto-electronics Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Opto-electronics Information Technology, Ministry of Education, Tianjin 300072, China
  • 3Department of Electrical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
  • 4Department of Chemistry, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/42/5/051001 Cite this Article
    Enqing Zhang, Zhengkun Xing, Dian Wan, Haoran Gao, Yingdong Han, Yisheng Gao, Haofeng Hu, Zhenzhou Cheng, Tiegen Liu. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy chips based on two-dimensional materials beyond graphene[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2021, 42(5): 051001 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) based on two-dimensional (2D) materials has attracted great attention over the past decade. Compared with metallic materials, which enhance Raman signals via the surface plasmon effect, 2D materials integrated on silicon substrates are ideal for use in the fabrication of plasmon-free SERS chips, with the advantages of outstanding fluorescence quenching capability, excellent biomolecular compatibility, tunable Fermi levels, and potentially low-cost material preparation. Moreover, recent studies have shown that the limits of detection of 2D-material-based SERS may be comparable with those of metallic substrates, which has aroused significant research interest. In this review, we comprehensively summarize the advances in SERS chips based on 2D materials. As several excellent reviews of graphene-enhanced Raman spectroscopy have been published in the past decade, here, we focus only on 2D materials beyond graphene, i.e., transition metal dichalcogenides, black phosphorus, hexagonal boron nitride, 2D titanium carbide or nitride, and their heterostructures. We hope that this paper can serve as a useful reference for researchers specializing in 2D materials, spectroscopy, and diverse applications related to chemical and biological sensing.

    1. Introduction

    Since it was originally discovered in the 1970s[1], surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), a technique with an enormous enhancement factor of 108 or even higher in Raman signals after adsorbing molecules on certain surfaces, has been widely studied[2], and increasingly used to develop highly sensitive molecular analytical tools[3]. It is now widely accepted that Raman enhancement phenomena are attributed to two mechanisms: the electromagnetic mechanisms (EMs), and chemical mechanisms (CMs). With regard to EMs, Raman enhancement mainly originates from the local field enhancement around the surfaces of rough or nanostructured noble metals (e.g., gold and silver), induced by the surface plasmon effect[4]. CMs usually occur due to the charge transfer effect between molecules and substrates[5]. In comparison with EMs, enhancement factors in CMs are typically moderate and material-dependent[6]. Due to a significant enhancement in Raman signals, SERS chips have enabled significant developments in chemical and biological sensing applications for trace gas monitoring[7], single-molecule analysis[8], disease diagnosis[9-11], and pesticide residue detection[12, 13].

    Two-dimensional (2D) materials provide us with emerging opportunities in SERS, since the discovery of graphene in 2004[14]. By virtue of advantages such as outstanding fluorescence quenching capability, excellent biomolecular compatibility, tunable Fermi levels, and potentially low-cost material preparation, 2D materials could potentially be considered as ideal metal-free SERS materials. However, such materials enhance Raman signals via CMs, and usually suffer from limited Raman enhancement factors (EFs) (typically below 103), as compared with metallic materials[15]. In recent studies, researchers have found that this problem may be solved by utilizing 2D heterostructure materials[16] or by doping 2D materials via chemical methods[17]. Consequently, 2D-material SERS chips have attracted significant research attention in the past few years. Having first explored graphene-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (GERS), researchers have devoted much attention to studies of SERS based on other 2D materials and their hybrids, such as transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), black phosphorus (BP), hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN), and 2D titanium carbide or nitride (MXenes). By integrating these materials on silicon-based chips, SERS detection devices could be made widely accessible, meeting the requirements of diverse analytic scenarios.

    In this review, we comprehensively summarize novel SERS techniques based on metal-free 2D materials beyond graphene, including TMDs, BP, h-BN, and MXenes. Firstly, we briefly introduce 2D materials’ physicochemical properties, before categorizing the cutting-edge progress of SERS studies based on these substrates. Due to this paper’s length limit, SERS studies of metal-2D-material hybrid substrates are not included here. Finally, we summarize the review, and discuss prospects in this area. We hope this review will serve as a useful reference for researchers in the fields of 2D materials, spectroscopy, and their applications in chemical and biological sensing.

    2. Mechanisms of SERS

    It is generally believed that the Raman enhancement in SERS originates primarily from two mechanisms: EMs and CMs. With respect to EMs, the Raman enhancement usually occurs around surface locations in noble metal nanoparticles, known as “hot spots”[18]. When the incident light is in resonance with the nanoparticle’s localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) frequency, the incident light excites electrons on the metal nanoparticle’s surface, leading to a polarization of charge and oscillating dipoles, as shown in Fig. 1(a). Since the frequencies of Raman scattered Stokes (or anti-Stokes) fields are typically close to that of the incident light, the resonance results in an intensity enhancement of both incident light and Raman scattering light. Consequently, overall enhanced Raman signal intensity ( ) can be expressed as[19]:

    (Color online) Schematics of the mechanisms of SERS. (a) With respect to EMs, when the incident laser is in resonance with the nanoparticle LSPR frequency, the incident laser excites electrons on the metal surface, leading to a polarization of charge and oscillating dipoles. As the frequencies of Raman scattering light are close to that of the incident laser, the resonance also increases the intensity of the Raman scattering light. (b) For CMs, electrons are transferred from the Fermi level of the substrate to the LUMO of the molecule, thereby forming a charge transfer intermediate. The energy transition () between the Fermi level of the substrate and LUMO is much stronger than that () between the highest occupied molecular orbit (HOMO) and LUMO, resulting in a higher Raman scattering cross-section.

    Figure 1.(Color online) Schematics of the mechanisms of SERS. (a) With respect to EMs, when the incident laser is in resonance with the nanoparticle LSPR frequency, the incident laser excites electrons on the metal surface, leading to a polarization of charge and oscillating dipoles. As the frequencies of Raman scattering light are close to that of the incident laser, the resonance also increases the intensity of the Raman scattering light. (b) For CMs, electrons are transferred from the Fermi level of the substrate to the LUMO of the molecule, thereby forming a charge transfer intermediate. The energy transition ( ) between the Fermi level of the substrate and LUMO is much stronger than that ( ) between the highest occupied molecular orbit (HOMO) and LUMO, resulting in a higher Raman scattering cross-section.

    $ {I}_{\rm{SERS}}={\left|{E}_{\rm{in}}\right|}^{2}{\left|{E}_{\rm{s}}\right|}^{2}\approx {\left|{E}_{\rm{in}}\right|}^{4}, $ (1)

    where and are magnitudes of electric fields of incident light and Raman scattering light, respectively. It can therefore be understood that Raman enhancement factors due to EMs are equal to the fourth power of the electric field enhancement value at the incident light frequency. Although EMs may result in an extremely high Raman enhancement factor (up to 109, or even higher)[20, 21], the enhancement typically suffers from a photothermal heat-generation effect, leading to an obvious temperature rise (up to or over one hundred degrees)[22], that may be harmful in relation to biomolecular detection. Moreover, the nanoparticle LSPR is generally a function of the incident light frequency, particle size, shape, and surrounding medium[23]. Consequently, metallic structures require careful design in order to achieve appreciable enhancement factors.

    On the other hand, CMs are often attributed to the charge transfer effect, which is not yet clearly understood[24-26]. Compared with EMs, CMs originate from short-range effects arising from the strong electronic coupling interaction between substrates and molecules, as shown in Fig. 1(b). Taking graphene-based SERS as an example[25], this interaction transfers electrons from the Fermi level of the substrate to the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LOMO) in a molecule, thereby forming a charge transfer intermediate, whose Raman scattering cross-section is much higher than that of the unabsorbed molecule, which is similar to the resonant Raman scattering[26]. Moreover, the charge-transfer resonance between 2D semiconductor materials and molecules, associated with the photon-induced charge transfer from semiconductor band edges to the affinity levels of molecules, is considered to contribute to changes in molecular polarizability in relation to SERS[27]. In practical metallic SERS applications, both EMs and CMs usually co-occur on metal surfaces, while chemical enhancement factors are usually moderate (typically below 103) compared with those of EMs[28], but do not suffer from the disadvantage of photothermal heat generation. It is worthwhile to note that some studies show that chemical enhancement factors could be significantly improved using dielectrics[29], semiconductors[30], or 2D materials[31], offering us an unprecedented opportunity to develop and revolutionize plasmon-free SESR substrates.

    3. SERS based on 2D materials beyond graphene

    In this section, we summarize SERS advances based on diverse 2D materials beyond graphene, as shown in Fig. 2. The section is divided into five parts, covering the development of SERS chips based on TMDs, h-BNs, BP, MXenes, and their heterostructures, respectively. In each part, we first briefly introduce the physiochemical properties of 2D materials for use in developing SERS, then discuss state-of-the-art experimental results.

    (Color online) Comparison of various 2D materials beyond graphene for SERS applications, including TMDs, BP, h-BN, MXenes, and their heterostructures.

    Figure 2.(Color online) Comparison of various 2D materials beyond graphene for SERS applications, including TMDs, BP, h-BN, MXenes, and their heterostructures.

    3.1. SERS based on TMDs

    TMDs, consisting of covalently bonded X–M–X atoms (M = transition metals of groups IV–VI; X = chalcogen), where M is a transition metal atom (e.g., Mo or W), and X is a chalcogenide atom (e.g., S, Te or Se), have a series of superior properties, ideal for potential use in SERS chips[32-37]. Firstly, as the density of states (DOSs) near the Femi level plays an important role in changing the electron transition probability, TMDs show superior enhancement capability as compared to that of graphene[38]. Secondly, in their thermodynamically 2H phase, MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, and WeSe2 are semiconductors[39], facilitating the photoinduced charge transfer (PICT) effect between substrates and absorbed molecules. It is helpful to increase molecular Raman scattering cross-sections. Finally, TMDs usually have three-layered atomic structures, thereby offering abundant surface sites for chemisorption, with high oscillator strengths in the exciton bands, together with excitonic resonance[19], with the potential to boost Raman signals.

    Given these excellent properties, TMDs have been extensively studied for use in SERS chips[40-49]. In 2016, Muehlethaler et al.[50] first observed an EF of for organic molecule (4-mercaptopyridine) sensing, based on a monolayer MoS2 substrate, as shown in Fig. 3(a). This ultrahigh enhancement factor is attributed to the fact that the laser excitation wavelength (488 nm) was in resonance with the charge-transfer transitions at a wavelength of 467 nm, and close to the shifted C-exciton resonant wavelengths (360–390 nm). The exciton induced via laser excitation has an extremely high oscillator strength, and therefore contributes to the enhancement via “intensity borrowing”. Moreover, since surface functionalization and defect engineering lead to a strong interaction between TMDs and adsorbed molecules, they provide an effective approach to improving charge-transfer efficiency for SERS[51, 52]. For example, Zheng et al.[53] demonstrated that oxygen incorporation contributes to the improvement of the SERS performance for non-metal-oxide semiconductors. The oxygen-incorporated MoS2 substrate exhibits a remarkable SERS sensitivity, with an EF of up to 105, as compared with the oxygen-unincorporated sample. In this work, the Raman enhancement effect of the oxygen-incorporation and oxygen-extraction MoS2 substrates can be attributed to two factors. One factor is that additional energy levels enhance the possibility of charge transfer between the MoS2 substrate and molecules that are in resonance with the incident photons. The second contribution arises from the improvement of the exciton resonance, as shown in Fig. 3(b). Interestingly, as the oxidation process of TMDs affects SERS, Hou et al.[54] used SERS to monitor the oxidation and degradation of MoS2, which directly guides stability prediction in TMDs-based devices, and monitors the quality of TMDs. Moreover, as the structural transition of crystals leads to a change in the electronic structures of TMDs, TMDs phase engineering has also attracted a great deal of attention in relation to the enhancement of Raman signals[55, 56]. Based on the phase engineering method, Yin et al.[57] theoretically and experimentally studied the Raman enhancement effects of R6G, crystal violet (CV), and copper phthalocyanine (CuPc) molecules on monolayer MoX2, before and after crystal structure transition from the 2H- to 1T-phases. Their results show that the phase transition from 2H-MoX2 to 1T-MoX2 may significantly increase Raman signals. Specifically, the immersion of four types of monolayer substrates in a 10–5 M R6G solution results in EF values in the following order: 1T MoSe2 > 1T MoS 2 > 1H MoSe 2 > 1H MoS 2, as shown in Fig. 3(c). This difference may arise from the highly efficient charge transfer from the Fermi level of 1T MoX2 to nearby molecules. Furthermore, to further improve Raman scattering, on-chip optical structures of light-field-promoting intensities have been integrated with TMD substrates. For instance, Tao et al.[58] demonstrated CVD-grown large-scale 1T′-W(Mo)Te2 atomic layers, which exhibited prominent Raman enhancement, with EFs of ( ), and an limit of detection (LOD) value as low as 40(400) × 10–12 M. The team then showed that the detection sensitivities of R6G molecules could be further improved by integrating 2D materials on a silicon chip with a distributed Bragg reflector (DBR), as shown in Fig. 3(d). They demonstrated that the DBR could be used as a light-field amplifier to promote the light-field localization of WTe2, thereby improving the detection sensitivities of R6G molecules up to the femtomolar level.

    (Color online) SERS studies based on TMDs. (a) Schematic of measurement and enhanced Raman spectra of 4-mercaptopyridine on monolayer MoS2. (b) Energy levels of the oxygen-incorporation MoS2-R6G system. Here, and denote exciton transition and molecular transition, and denotes PICT. (c) Measured Raman spectra of R6G molecules on 1T MoSe2, 1T MoS2, 2H MoSe2, and 2H MoS2 substrates. (d) Measured Raman spectra of R6G on a 1T’-WTe2 substrate, with and without the DBR. (a) is reprinted with permission from Ref. [50]. Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society. (b) is reprinted with permission from Ref. [53]. Copyright © 2017, Nature Publishing Group. (c) is reprinted with permission from Ref. [57]. Copyright © 2017 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. (d) is reprinted with permission from Ref. [ 58]. Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 3.(Color online) SERS studies based on TMDs. (a) Schematic of measurement and enhanced Raman spectra of 4-mercaptopyridine on monolayer MoS2. (b) Energy levels of the oxygen-incorporation MoS2-R6G system. Here, and denote exciton transition and molecular transition, and denotes PICT. (c) Measured Raman spectra of R6G molecules on 1T MoSe2, 1T MoS2, 2H MoSe2, and 2H MoS2 substrates. (d) Measured Raman spectra of R6G on a 1T’-WTe2 substrate, with and without the DBR. (a) is reprinted with permission from Ref. [50]. Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society. (b) is reprinted with permission from Ref. [53]. Copyright © 2017, Nature Publishing Group. (c) is reprinted with permission from Ref. [57]. Copyright © 2017 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. (d) is reprinted with permission from Ref. [ 58]. Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society.

    3.2. SERS based on h-BN

    h-BN, sp2-hybridized 2D insulator is a structural analog of graphene, with sublattices being occupied by equal numbers of boron and nitrogen atoms, arranged alternately in a honeycomb configuration[59]. Due to their atomic thin surfaces, which are free of dangling bonds, and exhibit negligible defects, as well as only a small lattice constant mismatch (~17%)[60] with graphene, h-BN, also known as “white graphene”, has been studied as an ideal platform for use in photodetectors[61], energy harvest devices[62], electronic packaging[63], and biomedicines[64]. Compared with nonpolar and conductive 2D materials, e.g., graphene, h-BN is highly polar, as well as insulating, due to its large bandgap of 5.9 eV[65]. Moreover, it has a polar surface with high resistance to oxidation[66, 67].

    Based on these unique properties, h-BN may be a good alternative to graphene for the purpose of Raman enhancement. It has been proposed that the Raman enhancement mechanism for h-BN may stem from different factors. In 2014, Ling et al.[68] comprehensively compared and studied different SERS chips consisting of graphene, h-BN, and MoS2, respectively, as shown in Fig. 4(a). The enhancement factors of graphene-based and h-BN-based SERS chips are strong, as shown in Fig. 4(b). In contrast to the strong charge transfer between graphene and CuPc, the dipole-dipole interaction between h-BN and CuPc can cause local symmetry-related perturbation to increase LUMO-HOMO transitions, inducing an increase in the probability of electron transition[68]. The high enhancement factors of CuPc on the h-BN SERS chips inspired researchers to explore their possible application in the field of biological sensing. For example, Liu et al.[69] created a novel theragnostic platform, in which CuPc, hairpin quadruplex (HG) DNA, and h-BN were integrated for the purpose of real-time imaging and in-situ monitoring of miR-21. In this way, CuPc was used as a diagnostic sounder for miR-21, while HG-DNA was used to further enhance detection sensitivity.

    (Color online) SERS studies based on h-BN, BP, and MXenes. (a) Preparation of SERS chips based on graphene, h-BN, and MoS2. The layered 2D materials are shown in gray, while probe molecules are shown in red. (b) Raman spectra of CuPc molecules on SiO2/Si (black line), MoS2 (green line), h-BN (red line), and graphene (blue line) substrates. (c) Raman spectra of RhB molecules (~10–8 M) on a BP substrate, showing different Raman peaks, which could be attributed to different vibrational transitions in the RhB molecules. (d) Schematic of Ti2NTx, etched and delaminated from Ti2AlN, and employed as a SERS substrate. (a) and (b) are reprinted with permission from Ref. [68]. © 2019 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. (c) is reprinted with permission from Ref. [ 80]. Copyright © 2019 the Royal Society of Chemistry. (d) is reprinted with permission from Ref. [92]. Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 4.(Color online) SERS studies based on h-BN, BP, and MXenes. (a) Preparation of SERS chips based on graphene, h-BN, and MoS2. The layered 2D materials are shown in gray, while probe molecules are shown in red. (b) Raman spectra of CuPc molecules on SiO2/Si (black line), MoS2 (green line), h-BN (red line), and graphene (blue line) substrates. (c) Raman spectra of RhB molecules (~10–8 M) on a BP substrate, showing different Raman peaks, which could be attributed to different vibrational transitions in the RhB molecules. (d) Schematic of Ti2NTx, etched and delaminated from Ti2AlN, and employed as a SERS substrate. (a) and (b) are reprinted with permission from Ref. [68]. © 2019 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. (c) is reprinted with permission from Ref. [ 80]. Copyright © 2019 the Royal Society of Chemistry. (d) is reprinted with permission from Ref. [92]. Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society.

    3.3. SERS based on BP

    Of all the 2D materials, BP demonstrates a series of unique characteristics for use in Raman enhancement. Firstly, BP, as a 2D layered material with anisotropy, can provide detailed information about the charge-transfer process as compared to the use of isotropic materials[70]. Secondly, the bandgap of BP is dependent on its thickness, which is tunable from about 0.3 eV (bulk) to 2.0 eV (monolayer), making it suitable for developing SERS substrates that can be specifically tailored[71]. Finally, as the first-layer effect plays an important role in CMs[72], BP possesses a much higher surface-to-volume ratio than that found in other 2D materials, e.g., graphene and TMDs, due to its puckered lattice configuration[73, 74], maximizing the adsorbing effect of molecules on a chip.

    To explore the intrinsic SERS performance of BP[75, 76], a process flow of controlled nano-structuring has been established. Several approaches have been studied in relation to the nano-patterning and thinning of BP flakes, such as plasma oxidation[77], thermal sublimation[78], and laser oxidation processes[79]. For example, Kundu et al.[80] used a low-power laser, at a wavelength of 532 nm, to irradiate few-layer BP flakes. They demonstrated that few-layer BP flakes with a thickness of ~200 nm can be uniformly thinned down to 2–3 layers, with a thickness of ~ 4 nm, by controlling both laser power and exposure time. This promising result may prove useful in the development of metal-free SERS chips with an EF of ~106, and an LOD of ~10–8 M, for RhB detection, as shown in Fig. 4(c). Moreover, due to its in-plane low symmetry and anisotropic charge carrier mobility[81-83], BP is an ideal material with which to investigate how the electronic properties of a substrate can affect its chemical enhancement. Based on a few-layer BP flake on a chip, Lin et al.[84] utilized CuPc molecules as a Raman probe, and observed a unique angle-dependent SERS enhancement, which was attributed to the excellent mobility of charge carriers along its armchair direction, regardless of the molecular orientation of the CuPc.

    3.4. SERS based on MXenes

    MXenes share a general formula of Mn+1XnTx(n = 1–3), where M is an early transition metal, X is a carbon or nitrogen, and T is the surface termination (O, OH, F, or Cl)[85]. They exhibit unique optoelectronic properties, such as high metallic conductivity and hydrophilicity[86], which are suitable for the development of SERS chips[87-89].

    For their proof-of-the-concept, Ye et al.[90] reported the large-scale synthesis of highly crystalline monolayer Ti3C2 nanosheets via an effective chemical exfoliation method. These ultrathin Ti3C2 nanosheets can be assembled into flexible SERS chips with an LOD of 10–11 M, and an EF of up to . The ultrasensitive SERS capabilities of Ti3C2 monolayers arise from the dual functions of strong localized-SPR, and remarkable interfacial charge-transfer. In addition, the wavelengths of excitation lasers play an important role in SERS performance[88]. In 2017, Sarycheva et al.[91] demonstrated a method of producing Ti3C2Tx SERS chips with design-inherent hot-spots and CMs-enabling electronic structures with an EF of 105–106, together with chemical selectivity in order to dye molecules. By calculating the SERS enhancement of R6G, it can be demonstrated that the EFs are ~ and , for the 488-nm-wavelength and 514-nm-wavelength lasing excitations, respectively. Moreover, in comparison with the widely-studied carbon-based Mxenes, nitride-based Mxenes may possess high electronic conductivity, which could contribute to the enhancement of CMs. For example, Soundiraraju et al.[92] reported the synthesis of Ti2N by means of the selective etching of Al from a Ti2AlN precursor, using a mixture of potassium fluoride and hydrochloric acid, as shown in Fig. 4(d). The Raman signal enhancement in the presence of Ti2NTx MXene could be attributed to the high electron-density distribution on the N atom, as a result of the transfer of electrons from Ti atoms.

    3.5. SERS based on 2D-material heterostructures

    Recently, 2D van der Waals (vdW) heterostructures, which are assembled by stacking different 2D crystals on top of one another, have been shown to provide promising platforms for developing SERS chips, since they can take advantage of the merits of various SERS materials. For instance, GERS depends on the ground-state charge transfer at the interface, while the enhancement of the Raman scattering is subject to the DOS of graphene[93, 94]. On the other hand, TMDs have a more complex band structure, and abundant electronic states, yet the intensity of the Raman scattering is weak due to a combination of ground-state charge transfer and dipole-dipole coupling[68]. 2D vdW heterostructures of graphene and TMDs could combine the ground-state charge transfer of graphene with the abundant electronic states of TMDs to enhance Raman signals. In addition, layered 2D-material heterostructures facilitate interlayer electronic tunneling to artificially build electronic band structures[95]. As CMs rely heavily on the electronic structures of materials, the electronic band structures of heterostructures with an artificially designed sequence could be anticipated to significantly enhance EFs[16]. Moreover, the weak vdW interface could lead to an enhanced electric dipole moment and dipole-dipole interaction, facilitate effective charge transfer across the vdW interfaces[72, 73], and therefore contribute to an overall improvement in SERS.

    Owing to the merits of 2D heterostructures, many efforts have been made to develop 2D heterostructures for studying SERS[96, 97]. In 2017, Tan et al.[16] demonstrated a heterostructure based on graphene (G) and WSe2 (W) monolayers as an efficient platform for SERS. The interlayer distance of the heterostructure was decreased from ~4 to 0.4 nm to achieve an optimized combination of graphene and WSe2. By changing the number and sequence of the stacked layers, i.e., G/W, G/W/G/W, and W/G/G/W, it was demonstrated that the influence of the stacking method on SERS performance primarily depends on the 2D material on the top, as shown in Fig. 5(a), indicating that Raman enhancement due to heterostructures is a surface effect. Heterostructures with more than two layers have a little impact on the enhancement of charge transfer, resulting in a similar performance, in terms of enhancement, with bilayer heterostructures, as shown in Fig. 5(b). Moreover, heterostructures could integrate the merits of two or more types of material exhibiting EM-comparable sensitives when utilized in SERS chips[98, 99]. For example, Qiu et al.[100] developed a highly effective SERS chip, based on graphene-microflowers (GMFs)/2H-MoS2, with a LOD of only M, and an EF of . This enhancement arises from the synergistic effects of the substantial pre-concentration of probe molecules, enhanced charge-transfer, and multiple light scattering. Compared with pristine graphene, the GMFs/2H-MoS2 heterostructure offers an abundance of S vacancies, serving as an intermediate level to promote charge-transfer between probe molecules and substrate, further enhancing SERS signals. Moreover, as the oxygen concentration in TMDs may tune the electronic structure and the oxygen atoms may induce a dipole moment on their surface, thereby increasing Raman enhancement effects[19], TMDs-based heterostructures have been proven to enhance Raman signals in the same way. In 2020, Seo et al.[101] synthesized uniform large-area ReOxSy via solution-phase deposition, and demonstrated an ultrasensitive SERS platform, based on a graphene/ReOxSy vertical heterostructure, with a femtomolar LOD. The electronic structure of ReOxSy can be modulated by changing the oxygen concentration in the lattice structure, offering effective complementary resonance effects between ReOxSy and R6G. In addition, since oxygen atoms have higher electronegativity (3.44) than sulfur atoms (2.58), their presence in the ReS2 lattice generates a dipole moment on the chip surface, resulting in strong dipole-dipole interaction between the ReOxSy and R6G molecules. Based on these two properties, ReOxSy was integrated with graphene to form a heterostructure via vdW interaction, producing an efficient Raman enhancement effect, as shown in Fig. 5(c). Furthermore, inspired by the development of semiconductor SERS chips[102, 103], researchers have recently devoted a great deal of attention to combining semiconducting-phase 2D materials, i.e., MoS2 and WTe2, with metal oxides to form semiconductor-heterojunctions, with the aim of further enhancing Raman scattering. For example, using W18O49 and monolayer MoS2, Li et al.[104] demonstrated that a vertical semiconductor-based heterojunction can not only increase the EF by a factor of , but can also endow SERS chips with a low LOD of below 10–9 M. This dramatically enhanced Raman scattering can be attributed to the enhancement of PICT processes, as shown in Fig. 5(d). In R6G-W18O49/MoS2 ternary systems, on the one hand, exciton resonance ( ) in the monolayer (MoS2) enhances the PICT resonance ( ), which increases the Raman scattering cross-section. On the other hand, as the electrons on the conduction band (CB) of MoS2 can easily transfer to the CB of W18O49, more electrons reach the CB of W18O49, which resulting in a larger number of permitted energy states for PICT, thereby improving charge transition probabilities. These two factors operate in conjunction to improve SERS performance.

    (Color online) SERS studies based on 2D heterostructures. (a) Schematic of Raman measurement of CuPc molecular coating on G/W/G/W chips. (b) Raman spectra of CuPc molecular coating on G/W/G/W and G/W chips, respectively. (c) Schematic of Raman enhancement mechanism of graphene/ReOxSy-MT chips. (d) Energy level diagrams and charge transfer in the R6G-W18O49/MoS2 complex. (a) and (b) are reprinted with permission from Ref. [16]. Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society. (c) is reprinted with permission from Ref. [98]. Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society. (d) is reprinted with permission from Ref. [104]. Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 5.(Color online) SERS studies based on 2D heterostructures. (a) Schematic of Raman measurement of CuPc molecular coating on G/W/G/W chips. (b) Raman spectra of CuPc molecular coating on G/W/G/W and G/W chips, respectively. (c) Schematic of Raman enhancement mechanism of graphene/ReOxSy-MT chips. (d) Energy level diagrams and charge transfer in the R6G-W18O49/MoS2 complex. (a) and (b) are reprinted with permission from Ref. [16]. Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society. (c) is reprinted with permission from Ref. [98]. Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society. (d) is reprinted with permission from Ref. [104]. Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society.

    4. Conclusion and perspective

    In this paper, we have reviewed the recent advances in SERS chips based on 2D materials for chemical and biological sensing. Since many excellent review papers of GERS have been published in the past few years[17, 93, 105-112], here, we focused primarily on state-of-the-art SERS experimental results based on other 2D materials, i.e., TMDs, h-BN, BP, MXenes, and their heterostructures, as shown in Table 1. Over 50 papers published in this area have been systematically summarized and categorized. Specifically, we have discussed the structures, physicochemical properties, SERS enhancement capability, Raman enhancement mechanisms, and sensing applications of these substrates. We hope that this snapshot of the status of 2D-material-based SERS chips could arouse more interest in this emerging area.

    Table Infomation Is Not Enable

    Compared with SERS based on metallic materials, 2D-material-based SERS chips are still in development. Firstly, in terms of mechanisms, Raman enhancement of 2D-material substrates mainly originates from CMs, specifically charge transfer resonance and dipole−dipole interaction, which varies based on different substrate materials and analytes. With the discovery of emerging low-dimensional materials, such as MnPS3–xSex[113], and transition metal oxides[114], a wealth of physical and chemical processes in SERS remain to be explored. Compared with the EMs, these are not yet well-understood. Secondly, due to the atomic-layer thickness of 2D materials, their physicochemical properties could be tunable by virtue of applying an external electric-field, tailoring morphologies, or constructing heterostructures consisting of multiple materials (e.g., low-dimensional materials, dielectrics, or metallic materials), representing a significant opportunity to engineer Raman enhancement capability. This unique feature may greatly expand the application scope of the sample analysis based on CMs, since chemical enhancements are usually system-dependent. As a result, this is a promising field, meriting in-depth study. Thirdly, it would be interesting to integrate 2D materials with microfluidic channels[115, 116] or photonic structures[117, 118] to improve light-matter interactions, as well as to explore lab-on-a-chip applications. Finally, the study of biosensing applications based on 2D-material-based SERS chips is in its infancy. Compared with metallic materials, 2D materials offer potential low-cost production, easy synthesis, excellent biocompatibility, and outstanding reproducibility for SERS chips, with great potential for use in a variety of chemical and biological sensing applications, including analytical chemistry, environmental science, pharmaceutical science, food science, forensic science, and pathology. Consequently, we believe tremendous opportunities exist with respect to 2D-material-based SERS chips, which are expected to become the next-generation SERS techniques.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61805175), Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP18K13798), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M670641).

    References

    [1] M Fleischmann, P J Hendra, A J McQuillan. Raman spectra of pyridine adsorbed at a silver electrode. Chem Phys Lett, 26, 163(1974).

    [2] N Chen, T H Xiao, Z Luo et al. Porous carbon nanowire array for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nat Commun, 11, 4772(2020).

    [3] X P Wei, S Su, Y Y Guo et al. A molecular beacon-based signal-off surface-enhanced Raman scattering strategy for highly sensitive, reproducible, and multiplexed DNA detection. Small, 9, 2493(2013).

    [4] C Srichan, M Ekpanyapong, M Horprathum et al. Highly-sensitive surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS)-based chemical sensor using 3D graphene foam decorated with silver nanoparticles as SERS substrate. Sci Rep, 6, 23733(2016).

    [5] A Campion, P Kambhampati. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Chem Soc Rev, 27, 241(1998).

    [6] Y F Shan, Z H Zheng, J J Liu et al. Niobium pentoxide: A promising surface-enhanced Raman scattering active semiconductor substrate. npj Comput Mater, 3, 11(2017).

    [7] S Y Ding, J Yi, J F Li et al. Nanostructure-based plasmon-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for surface analysis of materials. Nat Rev Mater, 1, 16021(2016).

    [8] N P Pieczonka, R F Aroca. Single molecule analysis by surfaced-enhanced Raman scattering. Chem Soc Rev, 37, 946(2008).

    [9] R Haldavnekar, K Venkatakrishnan, B Tan. Non plasmonic semiconductor quantum SERS probe as a pathway for in vitro cancer detection. Nat Commun, 9, 3065(2018).

    [10] J J S Rickard, V Di-Pietro, D J Smith et al. Rapid optofluidic detection of biomarkers for traumatic brain injury via surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nat Biomed Eng, 4, 610(2020).

    [11] J P Fraser, P Postnikov, E Miliutina et al. Application of a 2D molybdenum telluride in SERS detection of biorelevant molecules. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 12, 47774(2020).

    [12] T B Pham, T H C Hoang, V H Pham et al. Detection of Permethrin pesticide using silver nano-dendrites SERS on optical fibre fabricated by laser-assisted photochemical method. Sci Rep, 9, 12590(2019).

    [13] G C Shi, M L Wang, Y Y Zhu et al. Dragonfly wing decorated by gold nanoislands as flexible and stable substrates for surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). Sci Rep, 8, 6916(2018).

    [14] E Satheeshkumar, T Makaryan, A Melikyan et al. One-step solution processing of Ag, Au and Pd@MXene hybrids for SERS. Sci Rep, 6, 32049(2016).

    [15] A Campion, J E III Ivanecky, C M Child et al. On the mechanism of chemical enhancement in surface-enhanced Raman scattering. J Am Chem Soc, 117, 11807(1995).

    [16] Y Tan, L N Ma, Z B Gao et al. Two-dimensional heterostructure as a platform for surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Nano Lett, 17, 2621(2017).

    [17] S Feng, M C Dos Santos, B R Carvalho et al. Ultrasensitive molecular sensor using N-doped graphene through enhanced Raman scattering. Sci Adv, 2, e1600322(2016).

    [18] M Yang, R Alvarez-Puebla, H S Kim et al. SERS-active gold lace nanoshells with built-in hotspots. Nano Lett, 10, 4013(2010).

    [19] P Karthick Kannan, P Shankar, C Blackman et al. Recent advances in 2D inorganic nanomaterials for SERS sensing. Adv Mater, 31, 1803432(2019).

    [20] S L Kleinman, B Sharma, M G Blaber et al. Structure enhancement factor relationships in single gold nanoantennas by surface-enhanced Raman excitation spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc, 135, 301(2013).

    [21] K L Wustholz, A I Henry, J M McMahon et al. Structure–activity relationships in gold nanoparticle dimers and trimers for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc, 132, 10903(2010).

    [22] R C Maher, L F Cohen, E C Le Ru et al. A study of local heating of molecules under surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) conditions using the anti-Stokes/Stokes ratio. Faraday Discuss, 132, 77(2006).

    [23]

    [24] J Kim, Y Jang, N J Kim et al. Study of chemical enhancement mechanism in non-plasmonic surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS). Front Chem, 7, 582(2019).

    [25] X Ling, L G Moura, M A Pimenta et al. Charge-transfer mechanism in graphene-enhanced Raman scattering. J Phys Chem C, 116, 25112(2012).

    [26] X Ling, J X Wu, W G Xu et al. Probing the effect of molecular orientation on the intensity of chemical enhancement using graphene-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Small, 8, 1365(2012).

    [27] J Lin, Y Shang, X X Li et al. Ultrasensitive SERS detection by defect engineering on single Cu2O superstructure particle. Adv Mater, 29, 1604797(2017).

    [28] M Osawa, N Matsuda, K Yoshii et al. Charge transfer resonance Raman process in surface-enhanced Raman scattering from p-aminothiophenol adsorbed on silver: Herzberg-Teller contribution. J Phys Chem, 98, 12702(1994).

    [29] I Alessandri, J R Lombardi. Enhanced Raman scattering with dielectrics. Chem Rev, 116, 14921(2016).

    [30] J R Lombardi, R L Birke. Theory of surface-enhanced Raman scattering in semiconductors. J Phys Chem C, 118, 11120(2014).

    [31] T A Saleh, M M Al-Shalalfeh, A A Al-Saadi. Silver loaded graphene as a substrate for sensing 2-thiouracil using surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Sensor Actuat B, 254, 1110(2018).

    [32] C X Jiang, Y Q Wei, P C Zhao et al. Investigation of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy on the substrates of telluride 2D material. Eur Phys J Plus, 135, 671(2020).

    [33] H Kitadai, X Z Wang, N N Mao et al. Enhanced Raman scattering on nine 2D van der waals materials. J Phys Chem Lett, 10, 3043(2019).

    [34] W W Li, L Xiong, N C Li et al. Tunable 3D light trapping architectures based on self-assembled SnSe2 nanoplate arrays for ultrasensitive SERS detection. J Mater Chem C, 7, 10179(2019).

    [35] S Manzeli, D Ovchinnikov, D Pasquier et al. 2D transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat Rev Mater, 2, 1(2017).

    [36] X J Song, Y Wang, F Zhao et al. Plasmon-free surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy using metallic 2D materials. ACS Nano, 13, 8312(2019).

    [37] N Zhang, J J Lin, S Q Zhang et al. Doping modulated in-plane anisotropic Raman enhancement on layered ReS2. Nano Res, 12, 563(2019).

    [38] M P Chen, D Liu, X Y Du et al. 2D materials: Excellent substrates for surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) in chemical sensing and biosensing. Trac Trends Anal Chem, 130, 115983(2020).

    [39] K F Mak, J Shan. Photonics and optoelectronics of 2D semiconductor transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat Photonics, 10, 216(2016).

    [40] Y Lee, H Kim, J Lee et al. Enhanced Raman scattering of rhodamine 6G films on two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides correlated to photoinduced charge transfer. Chem Mater, 28, 180(2016).

    [41] H Li, Q Zhang, C C R Yap et al. From bulk to monolayer MoS2: Evolution of Raman scattering. Adv Funct Mater, 22, 1385(2012).

    [42] Z Li, S Z Jiang, S C Xu et al. Facile synthesis of large-area and highly crystalline WS2 film on dielectric surfaces for SERS. J Alloy Compd, 666, 412(2016).

    [43] Y R Liu, Z B Gao, M Chen et al. Enhanced Raman scattering of CuPc films on imperfect WSe2 monolayer correlated to exciton and charge-transfer resonances. Adv Funct Mater, 28, 1805710(2018).

    [44] Z Y Lu, H P Si, Z Li et al. Sensitive, reproducible, and stable 3D plasmonic hybrids with bilayer WS2 as nanospacer for SERS analysis. Opt Express, 26, 21626(2018).

    [45] L Meng, S Hu, C J Xu et al. Surface enhanced Raman effect on CVD growth of WS2 film. Chem Phys Lett, 707, 71(2018).

    [46] P Miao, J K Qin, Y F Shen et al. Unraveling the Raman enhancement mechanism on 1T'-phase ReS2 nanosheets. Small, 14, 1704079(2018).

    [47] A D Shutov, Z H Yi, J Z Wang et al. Giant chemical surface enhancement of coherent Raman scattering on MoS2. ACS Photonics, 5, 4960(2018).

    [48] Y Y Xu, C Yang, S Z Jiang et al. Layer-controlled large area MoS2 layers grown on mica substrate for surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Appl Surf Sci, 357, 1708(2015).

    [49] G Zheng, P Zhang, S W Zhang et al. SERS effect of selectively adsorbed dyes by hydrothermally-produced MoS2 nanosheets. New J Chem, 42, 18906(2018).

    [50] C Muehlethaler, C R Considine, V Menon et al. Ultrahigh Raman enhancement on monolayer MoS2. ACS Photonics, 3, 1164(2016).

    [51] L F Sun, H L Hu, D Zhan et al. Plasma modified MoS2 nanoflakes for surface enhanced Raman scattering. Small, 10, 1090(2014).

    [52] P Zuo, L Jiang, X Li et al. Enhancing charge transfer with foreign molecules through femtosecond laser induced MoS2 defect sites for photoluminescence control and SERS enhancement. Nanoscale, 11, 485(2019).

    [53] Z Zheng, S Cong, W Gong et al. Semiconductor SERS enhancement enabled by oxygen incorporation. Nat Commun, 8, 1993(2017).

    [54] X Hou, Q Lin, i Y Wei et al. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering monitoring of oxidation states in defect-engineered two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. J Phys Chem Lett, 11, 7981(2020).

    [55] M P Chen, B Ji, Z Y Dai et al. Vertically-aligned 1T/2H-MS2 (M = Mo, W) nanosheets for surface-enhanced Raman scattering with long-term stability and large-scale uniformity. Appl Surf Sci, 527, 146769(2020).

    [56] E Er, H L Hou, A Criado et al. High-yield preparation of exfoliated 1T-MoS2 with SERS activity. Chem Mater, 31, 5725(2019).

    [57] Y Yin, P Miao, Y M Zhang et al. Significantly increased Raman enhancement on MoX2 (X = S, Se) monolayers upon phase transition. Adv Funct Mater, 27, 1606694(2017).

    [58] L Tao, K Chen, Z Chen et al. 1T′ transition metal telluride atomic layers for plasmon-free SERS at femtomolar levels. J Am Chem Soc, 140, 8696(2018).

    [59] K L Zhang, Y L Feng, F Wang et al. Two dimensional hexagonal boron nitride (2D-hBN): Synthesis, properties and applications. J Mater Chem C, 5, 11992(2017).

    [60] G Giovannetti, P A Khomyakov, G Brocks et al. Substrate-induced band gap in graphene on hexagonal boron nitride: Ab initiodensity functional calculations. Phys Rev B, 76, 073103(2007).

    [61] J Li, S Majety, R Dahal et al. Dielectric strength, optical absorption, and deep ultraviolet detectors of hexagonal boron nitride epilayers. Appl Phys Lett, 101, 171112(2012).

    [62] K S Novoselov, A K Geim, S V Morozov et al. Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature, 438, 197(2005).

    [63] J Bao, M Edwards, S R Huang et al. Two-dimensional hexagonal boron nitride as lateral heat spreader in electrically insulating packaging. J Phys D, 49, 265501(2016).

    [64] D Chimene, D L Alge, A K Gaharwar. Two-dimensional nanomaterials for biomedical applications: Emerging trends and future prospects. Adv Mater, 27, 7261(2015).

    [65] J G Wang, F C Ma, W J Liang et al. Optical, photonic and optoelectronic properties of graphene, h-BN and their hybrid materials. Nanophotonics, 6, 943(2017).

    [66] Q R Cai, S Mateti, W R Yang et al. Boron nitride nanosheets improve sensitivity and reusability of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Angew Chem, 128, 8545(2016).

    [67] D Chugh, C Jagadish, H Tan. Large-area hexagonal boron nitride for surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Adv Mater Technol, 4, 1900220(2019).

    [68] X Ling, W J Fang, Y H Lee et al. Raman enhancement effect on two-dimensional layered materials: Graphene, h-BN and MoS2. Nano Lett, 14, 3033(2014).

    [69] J Liu, T T Zheng, Y Tian. Functionalized h-BN nanosheets as a theranostic platform for SERS real-time monitoring of MicroRNA and photodynamic therapy. Angew Chem Int Ed, 58, 7757(2019).

    [70] F N Xia, H Wang, Y C Jia. Rediscovering black phosphorus as an anisotropic layered material for optoelectronics and electronics. Nat Commun, 5, 4458(2014).

    [71] S Y Cho, Y Lee, H J Koh et al. Superior chemical sensing performance of black phosphorus: Comparison with MoS2 and graphene. Adv Mater, 28, 7020(2016).

    [72] X Ling, J Zhang. First-layer effect in graphene-enhanced Raman scattering. Small, 6, 2020(2010).

    [73] Z N Guo, H Zhang, S B Lu et al. From black phosphorus to phosphorene: Basic solvent exfoliation, evolution of Raman scattering, and applications to ultrafast photonics. Adv Funct Mater, 25, 6996(2015).

    [74] J Kim, J U Lee, J Lee et al. Correction: Anomalous polarization dependence of Raman scattering and crystallographic orientation of black phosphorus. Nanoscale, 12, 10407(2020).

    [75] S J Liu, N J Huo, S Gan et al. Thickness-dependent Raman spectra, transport properties and infrared photoresponse of few-layer black phosphorus. J Mater Chem C, 3, 10974(2015).

    [76] R Wang, X Y Yan, B C Ge et al. Facile preparation of self-assembled black phosphorus-dye composite films for chemical gas sensors and surface-enhanced Raman scattering performances. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 8, 4521(2020).

    [77] W L Lu, H Y Nan, J H Hong et al. Plasma-assisted fabrication of monolayer phosphorene and its Raman characterization. Nano Res, 7, 853(2014).

    [78] X L Liu, J D Wood, K S Chen et al. In situ thermal decomposition of exfoliated two-dimensional black phosphorus. J Phys Chem Lett, 6, 773(2015).

    [79] M Fortin-Deschênes, P L Levesque, R Martel et al. Dynamics and mechanisms of exfoliated black phosphorus sublimation. J Phys Chem Lett, 7, 1667(2016).

    [80] A Kundu, R Rani, K S Hazra. Controlled nanofabrication of metal-free SERS substrate on few layered black phosphorus by low power focused laser irradiation. Nanoscale, 11, 16245(2019).

    [81] D A Chenet, O B Aslan, P Y Huang et al. In-plane anisotropy in mono- and few-layer ReS2 probed by Raman spectroscopy and scanning transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett, 15, 5667(2015).

    [82] R X Fei, L Yang. Strain-engineering the anisotropic electrical conductance of few-layer black phosphorus. Nano Lett, 14, 2884(2014).

    [83] J Wu, N Mao, L Xie et al. Identifying the crystalline orientation of black phosphorus using angle-resolved polarized Raman spectroscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 54, 2366(2015).

    [84] J J Lin, L B Liang, X Ling et al. Enhanced Raman scattering on in-plane anisotropic layered materials. J Am Chem Soc, 137, 15511(2015).

    [85] K Huang, Z Li, J Lin et al. Two-dimensional transition metal carbides and nitrides (MXenes) for biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev, 47, 5109(2018).

    [86] M Naguib, M Kurtoglu, V Presser et al. Two-dimensional nanocrystals produced by exfoliation of Ti3AlC2. Adv Mater, 23, 4248(2011).

    [87] T B Limbu, B Chitara, J D Orlando et al. Green synthesis of reduced Ti3C2Tx MXene nanosheets with enhanced conductivity, oxidation stability, and SERS activity. J Mater Chem C, 8, 4722(2020).

    [88] R Y Liu, L Jiang, C X Lu et al. Large-scale two-dimensional titanium carbide MXene as SERS-active substrate for reliable and sensitive detection of organic pollutants. Spectrochim Acta A, 236, 118336(2020).

    [89] H B Wang, J F Zhang, Y P Wu et al. Surface modified MXene Ti3C2 multilayers by aryl diazonium salts leading to large-scale delamination. Appl Surf Sci, 384, 287(2016).

    [90] Y T Ye, W C Yi, W Liu et al. Remarkable surface-enhanced Raman scattering of highly crystalline monolayer Ti3C2 nanosheets. Sci China Mater, 63, 794(2020).

    [91] A Sarycheva, T Makaryan, K Maleski et al. Two-dimensional titanium carbide (MXene) as surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrate. J Phys Chem C, 121, 19983(2017).

    [92] B Soundiraraju, B K George. Two-dimensional titanium nitride (Ti2N) MXene: Synthesis, characterization, and potential application as surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrate. ACS Nano, 11, 8892(2017).

    [93] X Ling, L M Xie, Y Fang et al. Can graphene be used as a substrate for Raman enhancement. Nano Lett, 10, 553(2010).

    [94] C Y Qiu, H Q Zhou, H C Yang et al. Investigation of n-layer graphenes as substrates for Raman enhancement of crystal violet. J Phys Chem C, 115, 10019(2011).

    [95] T Georgiou, R Jalil, B D Belle et al. Vertical field-effect transistor based on graphene-WS2 heterostructures for flexible and transparent electronics. Nat Nanotechnol, 8, 100(2013).

    [96] Q R Cai, W Gan, A Falin et al. Two-dimensional van der waals heterostructures for synergistically improved surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 12, 21985(2020).

    [97] M L Yola, N Atar. Simultaneous determination of β-agonists on hexagonal boron nitride nanosheets/multi-walled carbon nanotubes nanocomposite modified glassy carbon electrode. Mater Sci Eng C, 96, 669(2019).

    [98] S A Ghopry, M A Alamri, R Goul et al. Extraordinary sensitivity of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy of molecules on MoS2 (WS2) nanodomes/graphene van der Waals heterostructure substrates. Adv Opt Mater, 7, 1801249(2019).

    [99] D Wu, J L Chen, Y E Ruan et al. A novel sensitive and stable surface enhanced Raman scattering substrate based on a MoS2 quantum dot/reduced graphene oxide hybrid system. J Mater Chem C, 6, 12547(2018).

    [100] H W Qiu, M Q Wang, L Zhang et al. Wrinkled 2H-phase MoS2 sheet decorated with graphene-microflowers for ultrasensitive molecular sensing by plasmon-free SERS enhancement. Sens Actuator B, 320, 128445(2020).

    [101] J Seo, J Lee, Y Kim et al. Ultrasensitive plasmon-free surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy with femtomolar detection limit from 2D van der waals heterostructure. Nano Lett, 20, 1620(2020).

    [102] S Cong, Y Yuan, Z Chen et al. Noble metal-comparable SERS enhancement from semiconducting metal oxides by making oxygen vacancies. Nat Commun, 6, 7800(2015).

    [103] A Musumeci, D Gosztola, T Schiller et al. SERS of semiconducting nanoparticles (TiO2 hybrid composites). J Am Chem Soc, 131, 6040(2009).

    [104] M Z Li, X C Fan, Y M Gao et al. W18O49/monolayer MoS2 heterojunction-enhanced Raman scattering. J Phys Chem Lett, 10, 4038(2019).

    [105] L M Xie, X Ling, Y Fang et al. Graphene as a substrate to suppress fluorescence in resonance Raman spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc, 131, 9890(2009).

    [106] H Xu, L M Xie, H L Zhang et al. Effect of graphene fermi level on the Raman scattering intensity of molecules on graphene. ACS Nano, 5, 5338(2011).

    [107] W Xu, X Ling, J Xiao et al. Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy on a flat graphene surface. PNAS, 109, 9281(2012).

    [108] W G Xu, N N Mao, J Zhang. Graphene: A platform for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Small, 9, 1206(2013).

    [109] C C Kuo, C H Chen. Graphene thickness-controlled photocatalysis and surface enhanced Raman scattering. Nanoscale, 6, 12805(2014).

    [110] H Kim, M L Seol, D I Lee et al. Single nanowire on graphene (SNOG) as an efficient, reproducible, and stable SERS-active platform. Nanoscale, 8, 8878(2016).

    [111] S X Huang, R Pandey, I Barman et al. Raman enhancement of blood constituent proteins using graphene. ACS Photonics, 5, 2978(2018).

    [112] A Silver, H Kitadai, H Liu et al. Chemical and bio sensing using graphene-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nanomaterials, 9, 516(2019).

    [113] X Y Hou, X Y Zhang, Q W Ma et al. Alloy engineering in few-layer manganese phosphorus trichalcogenides for surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Adv Funct Mater, 30, 1910171(2020).

    [114] X T Wang, W X Shi, S X Wang et al. Two-dimensional amorphous TiO2 nanosheets enabling high-efficiency photoinduced charge transfer for excellent SERS activity. J Am Chem Soc, 141, 5856(2019).

    [115] M R Lee, H K Lee, Y Yang et al. Direct metal writing and precise positioning of gold nanoparticles within microfluidic channels for SERS sensing of gaseous analytes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 9, 39584(2017).

    [116] Y J Oh, K H Jeong. Optofluidic SERS chip with plasmonic nanoprobes self-aligned along microfluidic channels. Lab Chip, 14, 865(2014).

    [117] Z Z Cheng, H K Tsang, X M Wang et al. In-plane optical absorption and free carrier absorption in graphene-on-silicon waveguides. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron, 20, 43(2014).

    [118] J Q Wang, Z Z Cheng, C Shu et al. Optical absorption in graphene-on-silicon nitride microring resonators. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett, 27, 1765(2015).

    Enqing Zhang, Zhengkun Xing, Dian Wan, Haoran Gao, Yingdong Han, Yisheng Gao, Haofeng Hu, Zhenzhou Cheng, Tiegen Liu. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy chips based on two-dimensional materials beyond graphene[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2021, 42(5): 051001
    Download Citation