Author Affiliations
1School of Life and Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China2Department of Food Science and Engineering, College of Food and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China3Institute of Materials Technology & Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, Chinashow less
. Schematic illustration for fabrication of HRP@MXene (Graphite/TiC/Ti3C2)/chitosan/GCE and H2O2 sensing principle of HRP@MXene/chitosan/GCE
. XRD patterns of G/TiC/Ti3AlC2 and G/TiC/Ti3C2 (A); FT-IR spectra of the MXene, HRP and HRP@MXene (B); SEM images of the MXene G/TiC (C) and Ti3C2 (D)
. EIS of Chit(chitosan)/GCE(a), MXene/Chit/GCE(b), HRP@MXene/Chit/GCE (c) electrodes cycled in 0.1 mol•L-1 KCL aqueous solution containing 5 mmol•L-1 [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- (A); CV curves of Chit/GCE (a), MXene/Chit/GCE (b), HRP@MXene/Chit/GCE (c) electrodes cycled in 0.1 mol•L-1 KCL aqueous solution containing 5 mmol•L-1 [Fe(CN)6]3-/4-: (potential window: -0.1-0.5 V vs. SCE) (B)
. CV curves of Chit/GCE (curve a, black line), MXene/ Chit/GCE (curve b, red line), HRP/Chit/GCE (curve c, pink line), HRP@MXene/Chit/GCE (curve d, blue line) electrodes cycled in N2-saturated 0.1 mol•L-1 PBS (pH 7.5) containing 1.0 mmol•L-1 HQ and 2.0 mmol•L-1 H2O2 at a scanning rate of 50 mV•s-1 (potential window: -0.8-0.8 V vs. SCE).
. Amperometric responses of HRP@MXene/Chit/ GCE at -0.1 V upon successive additions of H2O2 in astirred 0.1 mol•L-1 PBS (pH 7.5) (A); Calibration curve of amperometric responses at different H2O2 concentrations (B); Amperometric responses of HRP@MXene/Chit/ GCE at -0.1 V upon successive additions of solutions extracted from milk sample (C) and dried scallop (D) spiked with different H2O2 under stirred 0.1 mol•L-1 PBS (pH 7.5)
. EIS of various electrodes in 0.1 mol•L-1 KCL aqueous solution containing 5 mmol•L-1 [Fe(CN)6]3-/4-: Chit (pH 5.0)/GCE (curve b, red line), Chit (pH 6.0)/GCE (curve c, blue line) , Chit (pH 6.5)/GCE (curve d, green line), Chit (pH 7.0)/GCE (curve e, pink line) (A); CV curves of Chit (pH 5.0)/GCE (curve b, red line), Chit (pH 6.0)/GCE (curve c, blue line) , Chit (pH 6.5)/GCE (curve d, green line) , Chit (pH 7.0)/GCE (curve e, pink line) electrodes cycled in 0.1 mol•L-1 KCL aqueous solution containing 5 mmol•L-1 [Fe(CN)6]3-/4-: (potential window: -0.1-0.5 V vs. SCE) (B)
. CV curves of HRP@MXene/Chit/GCE electrodes cycled in N2-saturated 0.1 mol•L-1 PBS (pH 7.5) containing 1.0 mmol•L-1 HQ and 2.0 mmol•L-1 H2O2 at a different scanning rates (20-500 mV•s-1) (A); Plot of cathodic and anodic peak current for HRP@MXene/Chit/GCE versus scanning rate (B); Inset: Plots of anodic peak potential and cathodic peak potential for HRP@MXene/Chit/GCE electrode versus the logarithm of scan rate
. Effects of PBS buffer’s pH (A) and concentration of MXene (B) on the cathodic peak current of enzyme biosensor cycled in N2-saturated 0.1 mol•L-1 PBS ( pH 7.5) containing 1.0 mmol•L-1 HQ and 2.0 mmol•L-1 H2O2; Effects of PBS buffer’s pH (C) and concentration of MXene (D) on the DPV response of enzyme biosensor cycledin N2-saturated 0.1 mol•L-1 PBS (pH 7.5) containing 1.0 mmol•L-1 HQ and 2.0 mmol•L-1 H2O2
. Amperometric response of HRP@MXene/Chit/GCE in 0.1 mol•L-1 pH 7.5 PBS containing 100 mmol•L-1 of ascorbic acid, glucose, uric acid and H2O2 (Applied potential: -0.1 V) (A); Reduction peak currents of HRP@MXene/Chit/GCE stored in 50 mmol•L-1 PBS (pH 7.5) at 4 for 10 d (B)
Electrode | Linear range/(mmol•L-1) | LOD/(mmol•L-1) | Ref. |
---|
HRP-CTAB-Au/GCE | 0.50-105 | 0.23 | [1] | HRP/GO/GCE | 0.002-0.5 | 1.6 | [2] | HRP/TB/CCB | 0.429-455 | 0.17 | [3] | HRP-BMIM·BF4/SWCNTs | 0.49 to 10.2 | 0.13 | [4] | HRP/PGN/GCE | 2.77-835 | 2.67 ×10-4 | [5] | Hb-MXene-GO/Au foil | 2-1×103 | 1.95 | [6] | MXene/GCE | - | 0.7×10-3 | [7] | Hb-naf-MXene/GCE | 0.1-260 | 0.02 | [8] | TiO2-Hb-naf-MXene/GCE | 0.1-380 | 1.4×10-2 | [9] | HRP@MXene/Chitosan/GCE | 5-1.65×103 | 0.74 | This work |
|
Table 1. Comparison of the performance of present work with other published electrodes for hydrogen peroxide detection
Sample | Added H2O2/(mmol•L-1) | Found H2O2/(mmol•L-1) | Recovery/% | RSD/% |
---|
Milk | 12.5 | 13.037 | 104.30 | 5.88 | Milk | 50 | 52.57 | 105.14 | 1.12 | Milk | 125 | 136.5 | 109.20 | 3.33 | Dried scallop | 0 | 66.56 | - | - | Dried scallop | 12.5 | 77.84 | 90.24 | 6.97 | Dried scallop | 50 | 120.08 | 107.04 | 1.46 | Dried scallop | 125 | 189.11 | 98.04 | 8.39 |
|
Table 2. Detection of hydrogen peroxide in real food sample