• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 10, Issue 6, 1462 (2022)
Guoqing Jing1、†, Peipei Wang1、†, Haisheng Wu1、†, Jianjun Ren1, Zhiqiang Xie1, Junmin Liu2, Huapeng Ye3, Ying Li1, Dianyuan Fan1, and Shuqing Chen1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1International Collaborative Laboratory of 2D Materials for Optoelectronics Science and Technology, Institute of Microscale Optoelectronics, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
  • 2College of New Materials and New Energies, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen 518118, China
  • 3Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Optical Information Materials and Technology and Institute of Electronic Paper Displays, South China Academy of Advanced Optoelectronics, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.450564 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Guoqing Jing, Peipei Wang, Haisheng Wu, Jianjun Ren, Zhiqiang Xie, Junmin Liu, Huapeng Ye, Ying Li, Dianyuan Fan, Shuqing Chen. Neural network-based surrogate model for inverse design of metasurfaces[J]. Photonics Research, 2022, 10(6): 1462 Copy Citation Text show less
    (a) Unit cell of reflection-type metasurface. (b) Optical response spectrum data simulated using the FDTD method.
    Fig. 1. (a) Unit cell of reflection-type metasurface. (b) Optical response spectrum data simulated using the FDTD method.
    Diagram of physics-based NNSM.
    Fig. 2. Diagram of physics-based NNSM.
    Schematic of the inverse design process of the intelligent optimization algorithm.
    Fig. 3. Schematic of the inverse design process of the intelligent optimization algorithm.
    Predicted results of NNSM. (a) Loss curve as a function of training iteration. (b) Phase spectrum in x polarization. (c) Phase spectrum in y polarization. (d) Reflectance spectrum.
    Fig. 4. Predicted results of NNSM. (a) Loss curve as a function of training iteration. (b) Phase spectrum in x polarization. (c) Phase spectrum in y polarization. (d) Reflectance spectrum.
    (a) Comparison between the predicted results by the inverse design model and the ideal results calculated by FDTD method. (b) SEM image of the fabricated metasurfaces. (c) First line represents the intensity distributions of vortex beams with different OAM modes generated by Gaussian beam with different incident angles and polarization states, and the second line represents the intensity distributions of vortex beams after passing through the C-lens.
    Fig. 5. (a) Comparison between the predicted results by the inverse design model and the ideal results calculated by FDTD method. (b) SEM image of the fabricated metasurfaces. (c) First line represents the intensity distributions of vortex beams with different OAM modes generated by Gaussian beam with different incident angles and polarization states, and the second line represents the intensity distributions of vortex beams after passing through the C-lens.
    Results of metasurfaces-based four channels OAM multiplexing communication. (a) BER as a function of received power for different OAM modes. (b) Signal and noise powers corresponding to OAM multiplexing. (c) Constellations of different channels at received optical powers of 20 dBm and 24.5 dBm.
    Fig. 6. Results of metasurfaces-based four channels OAM multiplexing communication. (a) BER as a function of received power for different OAM modes. (b) Signal and noise powers corresponding to OAM multiplexing. (c) Constellations of different channels at received optical powers of 20 dBm and 24.5 dBm.
    Test results of the metasurface at different wavelengths (1500 nm, 1550 nm, 1600 nm). Top row, far-field light intensity distributions of right circularly polarized plane waves. Bottom row, detection results of projecting a vortex beam with l=−1 on the OAM generator.
    Fig. 7. Test results of the metasurface at different wavelengths (1500 nm, 1550 nm, 1600 nm). Top row, far-field light intensity distributions of right circularly polarized plane waves. Bottom row, detection results of projecting a vortex beam with l=1 on the OAM generator.
    Specific architecture of physics-based NNSM.
    Fig. 8. Specific architecture of physics-based NNSM.
    Metasurfaces-based four channels OAM multiplexing communication link. PC, polarization controller; IQ Mod., in-phase/quadrature modulator; EDFA, erbium-doped fiber amplifier; AWG, arbitrary waveform generator; BPF, bandpass filter; OC, optical coupler; SMF, single-mode fiber; Att., attenuator; LO, local oscillator; ICR, integrated coherent receiver; DSO, digital sampling oscilloscope.
    Fig. 9. Metasurfaces-based four channels OAM multiplexing communication link. PC, polarization controller; IQ Mod., in-phase/quadrature modulator; EDFA, erbium-doped fiber amplifier; AWG, arbitrary waveform generator; BPF, bandpass filter; OC, optical coupler; SMF, single-mode fiber; Att., attenuator; LO, local oscillator; ICR, integrated coherent receiver; DSO, digital sampling oscilloscope.
    Guoqing Jing, Peipei Wang, Haisheng Wu, Jianjun Ren, Zhiqiang Xie, Junmin Liu, Huapeng Ye, Ying Li, Dianyuan Fan, Shuqing Chen. Neural network-based surrogate model for inverse design of metasurfaces[J]. Photonics Research, 2022, 10(6): 1462
    Download Citation