Author Affiliations
1School of Optoelectronic Engineering, Changchun University of Science and Technology,Changchun 130022, Jilin, China2National Demonstration Center for Experimental Opto-Electronic Engineering Education, School of Opto-Electronic Engineering, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, Jilin, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Flow chart of Laplace deformation
Fig. 2. Simplified models corresponding to different fixed ends. (a) Unilateral constraints; (b) adjacent constraint; (c) boundary constraints; (d) quadrilateral constraint; (e) trilateral constraints
Fig. 3. Deformation of standard components under random control points
Fig. 4. Distribution of deflection curve under simplified model
Fig. 5. Selecting control points according to deflection curve and different spacing. (a) Unilateral constraints; (b) adjacent constraint; (c) boundary constraints; (d) trilateral constraints; (e) quadrilateral constraint and unconstraint
Fig. 6. Mapping relationship diagram
Fig. 7. Diagram of proportional relation of y plane
Fig. 8. 3D reconstruction based on control points
Fig. 9. Optimal selection of control points. (a) Set a control point at maximum deflection; (b) add a control point in reverse direction of flexure; (c) control points are added one by one in reverse direction of flexure
Fig. 10. Analysis route of surface deformation
[15] Fig. 11. Deformation coincidence diagram of experimental surface. (a) Adjacent constraint; (b) boundary constraints; (c) quadrilateral constraint; (d) unilateral constraints
Fig. 12. Test deformation and control points diagram of an aircraft wing
Fig. 13. Deformation coincidence degree analysis of an aircraft wing
Point name | Realistic deformation model | | Laplace deformation model | | Coincidence test | |
---|
x | y | z | | x | y | z | | Dx | Dy | Dz | DMag |
---|
Pt1 | 179.625 | 973.772 | 1171.030 | | 179.627 | 973.772 | 1171.014 | | 0.002 | 0.000 | -0.016 | 0.016 | Pt2 | 486.712 | 592.892 | 1177.927 | | 486.776 | 592.914 | 1178.004 | | 0.065 | 0.022 | 0.077 | 0.103 | Pt3 | 1398.368 | 474.006 | 788.148 | | 1398.449 | 474.030 | 788.214 | | 0.081 | 0.025 | 0.066 | 0.107 | Pt4 | 2046.715 | 162.067 | 141.922 | | 2046.815 | 162.103 | 141.957 | | 0.100 | 0.036 | 0.035 | 0.112 | Pt5 | 1613.514 | 796.529 | 246.422 | | 1613.592 | 796.557 | 246.449 | | 0.078 | 0.028 | 0.028 | 0.087 | Pt6 | 1220.568 | 1275.179 | 251.841 | | 1220.588 | 1275.179 | 251.873 | | 0.020 | 0.000 | 0.032 | 0.038 | Pt7 | 907.134 | 1187.139 | 727.732 | | 907.136 | 1187.139 | 727.705 | | 0.002 | 0.000 | -0.027 | 0.027 |
|
Table 1. Deformation control point coincidence degree analysis of an aircraft wing
Method | Data acquisition mode | Surface of repetition /min | Operation | Precision /mm | Characteristic |
---|
Traditional methods | Scanning technique | 200 | Tedious | 0.10~0.15 | Large deformation has limitations | Proposed method | Measuring point | 80 | Simple | 0.12 | Accuracy control depends on human operation |
|
Table 2. Advantages and disadvantages comparison between traditional methods and proposed method