• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 9, Issue 7, 1264 (2021)
C. J. Zhu1、2、3, K. Hou1、4, Y. P. Yang1、6、*, and L. Deng5、7、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1MOE Key Laboratory of Advanced Micro-Structured Materials, School of Physics Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • 2School of Physical Science and Technology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China
  • 3Collaborative Innovation Center of Light Manipulations and Applications, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China
  • 4Department of Mathematics and Physics, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China
  • 5Center for Optics Research and Engineering (CORE), Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
  • 6e-mail: yang_yaping@tongji.edu.cn
  • 7e-mail: lu.deng@email.sdu.edu.cn
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.421234 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    C. J. Zhu, K. Hou, Y. P. Yang, L. Deng. Hybrid level anharmonicity and interference-induced photon blockade in a two-qubit cavity QED system with dipole–dipole interaction[J]. Photonics Research, 2021, 9(7): 1264 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    We theoretically study a quantum destructive interference (QDI)-induced photon blockade in a two-qubit driven cavity quantum electrodynamics system with dipole–dipole interaction (DDI). In the absence of dipole–dipole interaction, we show that a QDI-induced photon blockade can be achieved only when the qubit resonance frequency is different from the cavity mode frequency. When DDI is introduced the condition for this photon blockade is strongly dependent upon the pump field frequency, and yet is insensitive to the qubit–cavity coupling strength. Using this tunability feature we show that the conventional energy-level-anharmonicity-induced photon blockade and this DDI-based QDI-induced photon blockade can be combined together, resulting in a hybrid system with substantially improved mean photon number and second-order correlation function. Our proposal provides a nonconventional and experimentally feasible platform for generating single photons.
    H=j=12ΔaσjσjΔcaa+j=12g(aσj+aσj)+J(σ1σ2+σ2σ1)+j=12Ωp(σj+σj),

    View in Article

    ρt=i[H,ρ]+Lκ[ρ]+Lγ[ρ]+Lγ[ρ],

    View in Article

    H(n)=(nωc2ng002ngωa+(n1)ωc02(n1)g00ωa+(n1)ωc002(n1)g02ωa+(n2)ωc).(A1)

    View in Article

    E1(1)=ωa,with  Ψ1(1)=|,0,(A2a)

    View in Article

    E1(±)=12[ωc+ωa±8g2+(ωaωc)2]with  Ψ1(±)=N1(±)[ωaωc±8g2+(ωaωc)22g|gg,1+|+,0],(A2b)

    View in Article

    Δa+Δc=8g2+(ΔcΔa)2,(A3)

    View in Article

    g2=12ΔcΔa.(A4)

    View in Article

    |Ψ=n=02Cgg,n|gg,n+n=12C±,n1|±,n1+Cee,n2|ee,n2,(A5)

    View in Article

    itCgg,1=(Δciκ2)Cgg,1+2gC+,0+2ΩpC+,1,(A6a)

    View in Article

    itCgg,2=2gC+,1+(2Δciκ)Cgg,2,(A6b)

    View in Article

    itC+,0=(Δaiγ2)C+,0+2ΩpCgg,0+2gCgg,1+2ΩpCee,0,(A6c)

    View in Article

    itC+,1=(ΔaΔciγ2iκ2)C+,1+2ΩpCgg,1+2gCgg,2+2gCee,0,(A6d)

    View in Article

    itCee,0=(2Δaiγ)Cee,0+2ΩpC+,0+2gC+,1.(A6e)

    View in Article

    Cgg,2322ig2Ωp2(2Δa+Δc)F,(A7)

    View in Article

    Δc=2Δa.(A8)

    View in Article

    H(n)=(nωc2ng002ngωe+(n1)ωc+J02(n1)g00ωe+(n1)ωcJ002(n1)g02ωe+(n2)ωc).(A9)

    View in Article

    E1(1)=J+ωa,with  Ψ1(1)=|,0,(A10a)

    View in Article

    E1(±)=12[J+ωc+ωa±8g2+(J+ωac)2]with  Ψ1(±)=N1(±)[J+ωac±8g2+(J+ωac)22g|gg,1+|+,0],(A10b)

    View in Article

    g2=12Δc(ΔaJ).(A11)

    View in Article

    C. J. Zhu, K. Hou, Y. P. Yang, L. Deng. Hybrid level anharmonicity and interference-induced photon blockade in a two-qubit cavity QED system with dipole–dipole interaction[J]. Photonics Research, 2021, 9(7): 1264
    Download Citation