Author Affiliations
1College of Electrical Engineering, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China2Collaborative Innovation Center for Nanomaterials and Devices, College of Physics, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China3NUS Centre for Nanofibers and Nanotechnology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singaporeshow less
Fig. 1. Structure characterization of the CNFs. (a) Image of the CNFs under the SEM. (b) Image of the CNFs under the TEM. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [15].)
Fig. 2. Structure characterization of the CNSs. (a) Image of the CNSs under the SEM. (b) Image of the CNSs under the TEM. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [18].)
Fig. 3. Theory model of the CNTs.
Fig. 4. Structure characterization of the CNTs. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [29].)
Fig. 5. Raman spectra of pristine (thin solid), I2-intercalated (thick solid), and deintercalated (dashed) SWNTs in the low Raman shift range taken by: (a) the 514.5-nm line of an Ar-ion laser and by (b) the 647.1-nm line of Kr-ion laser. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [33].)
Fig. 6. (Color online) UV–vis spectroscopy of SWCNT-3 with 9 anthracene carboxylic acid in DI water. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [34].)
Fig. 7. (Color online) Fabrication steps of the RG/PDMS composite flexible sensor. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [35].)
Fig. 8. Schematic of the process of CVD method of preparing the GF/PDMS strain sensors. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [36].)
Fig. 9. (Color online) (a) Respective cyclic voltammograms of TiO2 nanotube supercapacitor, PEDOT–MWNT film supercapacitor and TiO2 nanotube + PEDOT–MWNT film supercapacitor in 1 M H2SO4 aqueous electrolyte. (b) Nyquist plots of TiO2 nanotube supercapacitor, PEDOT–MWNT film supercapacitor, and TiO2 nanotube + PEDOT–MWNT film supercapacitor from high frequency to low frequency. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [8].)
Fig. 10. (Color online) Temperature dependence of resistivity of several materials. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [37].)
Fig. 11. (Color online) (a) The values of contact resistance. (b) Characteristics of drain current versus gate voltage of transistors with a P3HT or F-SWCNT-P3HT channel and gold or MWCNT S/Ds. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [38].)
Fig. 12. (Color online) Resistance evolution of resulting structures as a function of gas concentrations. (a) CO. (b) CO2. (c) NH3. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [39].)
Fig. 13. (Color online) Two-dimensional circuit model for ballistic CNTFET. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [40].)
Fig. 14. (Color online) Drain-source current diagram versus dielectric constant. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [40].)
Fig. 15. (Color online) Transport features. (a) Sulfur Dioxide. (b) Acetonitrile. (c) Sarin Gas. (d) Carbonyl Chloride at logarithmic scale for VDS = 0.2, 0.4 V. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [40].)
Fig. 16. (Color online) (a) and (c) Reflection losses of raw CNTs and Ni with 2−5 mm thickness. (b) and (d) Complex permittivity ε and permeability μ of the raw CNTs and Ni. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. [41].)
Equipment | Specification |
---|
Copper mesh | 8 cm of length | | 3 cm of width | | 80 of mesh number | | 50 μm of copper diameter
| Hydrochloric acid/acetone solution | 1/5 of volume ratio of hydrochloric acid/acetone | Mixed solution of PDMS | 30/10/1 of mass ratio of n-hexane/PDMS monomer/curing agent | FeCl3/HCl solution
| 0.5 mol/L of amount of the substance of FeCl3 | 0.5 mol/L of amount of the substance of HCl |
|
Table 1. Several equipment and specification in the hydrothermal auxiliary method.
Equipment | Specification |
---|
Nickel foam template | 2 × 2 cm2 of size
| Glass slide | 3 × 20 mm2 of size of the rectangular shape
| FGF/isopropyl alcohol (IPA) solution | 4.9 mg/ml of the concentration | Galinstan eutectic alloy | 68.5%/21.5%/10% of atomic percentage of Ga/In/Sn |
|
Table 2. Several equipment and specification in the method of CVD.
Aspect | Hydrothermal auxiliary method | CVD method |
---|
Time (h) | 12 | 26 | Steps number | 13 | 7 | Equipment number | 14 | 14 | Complexity degree | Normal | Hard | Reference | 35 | 36 |
|
Table 3. Comparison between hydrothermal auxiliary method and CVD method.