• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 4, Issue 6, 293 (2016)
Hongwei Jia1、2, Fan Yang3, Ying Zhong4, and Haitao Liu1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Optical Information Science and Technology, Ministry of Education, Institute of Modern Optics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
  • 2SZU-NUS Collaborative Innovation Center for Optoelectronic Science & Technology, Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Devices and Systems of Ministry of Education and Guangdong Province, College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
  • 3State Key Laboratory of Low Dimensional Quantum Physics, Department of Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • 4State Key Laboratory of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.4.000293 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Hongwei Jia, Fan Yang, Ying Zhong, Haitao Liu. Understanding localized surface plasmon resonance with propagative surface plasmon polaritons in optical nanogap antennas[J]. Photonics Research, 2016, 4(6): 293 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    The plasmonic nanogap antenna is an efficient radiating or receiving optical device. The resonance behavior of optical antennas is commonly attributed to the excitation of a localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR), which can be theoretically defined as the quasi-normal mode (QNM). To clarify the physical origin of the LSPR, we build up an analytical model of the LSPR by considering a multiple scattering process of propagative surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) on the antenna arms. The model can comprehensively reproduce the complex eigenfrequency and the field distribution of QNMs of the antenna, unveiling that the LSPR arises from a Fabry–Perot resonance of SPPs. By further applying the complex pole expansion theorem of meromorphic functions, the field of the antenna under illumination by a nearby dipole emitter can be analytically expanded with QNMs, which well predicts the frequency response of the enhancement factor of radiation. The present model establishes explicit relations between the concepts of the LSPR and the propagative SPP and integrates the advantages of the Fabry–Perot and QNM formalisms of nanogap antennas.
    ΨQNM=a1uΨSPP,L,s+a2uΨSPP,+R,s+b1uΨSPP,+G,s+b2uΨSPP,G,s,(1)

    View in Article

    a1=b1uρ+b2uτ,(2a)

    View in Article

    a2=b1uτ+b2uρ,(2b)

    View in Article

    b1=a1ur,(2c)

    View in Article

    b2=a2ur,(2d)

    View in Article

    u2r(ρ+τ)=1,(3a)

    View in Article

    u2r(ρτ)=1.(3b)

    View in Article

    ΨQNMb=ΨSPP,L,s+ΨSPP,+R,s+urΨSPP,+G,s+urΨSPP,G,s,(4a)

    View in Article

    ΨQNMa=ΨSPP,L,sΨSPP,+R,s+urΨSPP,+G,surΨSPP,G,s.(4b)

    View in Article

    k0,c=ln(|r||ρ+τ|)+i[arg(r)+arg(ρ+τ)2Mπ]i2neffL,(5a)

    View in Article

    k0,c=ln(|r||ρτ|)+i[arg(r)+arg(ρτ)2Nπ]i2neffL,(5b)

    View in Article

    2Re(k0,cneff)L+arg(r)+arg(ρ+τ)=2Mπ,(6a)

    View in Article

    2Re(k0,cneff)L+arg(r)+arg(ρτ)=2Nπ.(6b)

    View in Article

    c1=c2=β1u2r(ρ+τ),(8a)

    View in Article

    d1=d2=βur1u2r(ρ+τ).(8b)

    View in Article

    Ψ=ΨSourceG+c1uΨSPP,L,s+c2uΨSPP,+R,s+d1uΨSPP,+G,s+d2uΨSPP,G,s,(9)

    View in Article

    Ψ(ω)=Ψ(0)+nω/ωc,nωωc,npn,(10)

    View in Article

    pn=limωωc,nβu(ωωc,n)1u2r(ρ+τ)×(ΨSPP,L,s+ΨSPP,+R,s+urΨSPP,+G,s+urΨSPP,G,s),(11)

    View in Article

    limωωc,Mβu(ωωc,M)1u2r(ρ+τ)=(βu)ω=ωc,M[4πiωneffLc(1ω+1neffneffω)1rrω1ρ+τ(ρ+τ)ω]ω=ωc,M.(12)

    View in Article

    Ψ(ω)=MηM(ω)ΨQNM,Mb,(13)

    View in Article

    ηM(ω)=ω/ωc,Mωωc,M×(βu)ω=ωc,M[4πiωneffLc(1ω+1neffneffω)1rrω1ρ+τ(ρ+τ)ω]ω=ωc,M.(14)

    View in Article

    f1=e1ur,(15a)

    View in Article

    f2=α+e2ur,(15b)

    View in Article

    e1=f1uρ+f2uτ,(15c)

    View in Article

    e2=f2uρ+f1uτ,(15d)

    View in Article

    e+=αu(ρ+τ)/21u2r(ρ+τ),(16a)

    View in Article

    e=αu(ρτ)/21u2r(ρτ),(16b)

    View in Article

    f+=α/21u2r(ρ+τ),(16c)

    View in Article

    f=α/21u2r(ρτ).(16d)

    View in Article

    Ψ=ΨSourceT+e1uΨSPP,L,s+e2uΨSPP,+R,s+f1uΨSPP,+G,s+f2uΨSPP,G,s.(17)

    View in Article

    Ψ=ΨSourceT+α/(2r)1u2r(ρ+τ)[u2r(ρ+τ)ΨSPP,L,s+u2r(ρ+τ)ΨSPP,+R,s+urΨSPP,+G,s+urΨSPP,G,s]+α/(2r)1u2r(ρτ)[u2r(ρτ)ΨSPP,L,su2r(ρτ)ΨSPP,+R,s+urΨSPP,+G,surΨSPP,G,s].(18)

    View in Article

    Ψ(ω)=MξM(ω)ΨQNM,Mb+NζN(ω)ΨQNM,Na,(19)

    View in Article

    ξM(ω)=ω/ωc,Mωωc,M×(α/2r)ω=ωc,M[4πiωneffLc(1ω+1neffneffω)1rrω1ρ+τ(ρ+τ)ω]ω=ωc,M,(20a)

    View in Article

    ζN(ω)=ω/ωc,Nωωc,N×(α/2r)ω=ωc,N[4πiωneffLc(1ω+1neffneffω)+1rrω+1ρτ(ρτ)ω]ω=ωc,N.(20b)

    View in Article

    Hongwei Jia, Fan Yang, Ying Zhong, Haitao Liu. Understanding localized surface plasmon resonance with propagative surface plasmon polaritons in optical nanogap antennas[J]. Photonics Research, 2016, 4(6): 293
    Download Citation