• Journal of Semiconductors
  • Vol. 40, Issue 7, 071905 (2019)
Zhe He1, Jiawei Yang2, Lidan Zhou2, Yan Chen3, Tianming Zhao1, Ying Yu2, and Jin Liu1
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies, School of Physics, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies, School of Electronics and Information Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
  • 3Institute for Integrative Nanosciences, Leibniz IFW Dresden, Helmholtzstrasse 20, Dresden 01069, Germany
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/40/7/071905 Cite this Article
    Zhe He, Jiawei Yang, Lidan Zhou, Yan Chen, Tianming Zhao, Ying Yu, Jin Liu. Broadband photonic structures for quantum light sources[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(7): 071905 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    Quantum light sources serve as one of the key elements in quantum photonic technologies. Such sources made from semiconductor material, e.g., quantum dots (QDs), are particularly appealing because of their great potential of scalability enabled by the modern planar nanofabrication technologies. So far, non-classic light sources based on semiconductor QDs are currently outperforming their counterparts using nonlinear optical process, for instance, parametric down conversion and four-wave mixing. To fully exploring the potential of semiconductor QDs, it is highly desirable to integrate QDs with a variety of photonic nanostructures for better device performance due to the improved light-matter interaction. Among different designs, the photonic nanostructures exhibiting broad operation spectral range is particularly interesting to overcome the QD spectral inhomogeneity and exciton fine structure splitting for the generations of single-photon and entangled photon pair respectively. In this review, we focus on recent progress on high-performance semiconductor quantum light sources that is achieved by integrating single QDs with a variety of broadband photonic nanostructures i.e. waveguide, lens and low-Q cavity.

    1. Introduction

    Quantum photonic technologies requires high-performance light sources that emit quantum state of photons on-demand. Semiconductor QDs have been long believed as a very promising system for such high-performance quantum light sources because it can emit one single-photon or one entangled photon pair at a time under external optical/electrical excitations[15]. Nevertheless, the photon collection efficiency of QDs in a bulk semiconductor is typically < 1% because of the total internal reflection associated with the large refractive index contrast between the semiconductor and air, and therefore greatly limits the real application of such sources in experiments of optical quantum computation/simulation [68].

    Embedding single QDs in photonic nanostructures has been widely explored as a very effective strategy for improving the performance of quantum light sources based on QDs. Last decades have witnessed the tremendous developments on micro-cavities with high quality (Q) factors and small mode volumes in a variety of geometries, e.g., micro-disk[912], micro-pillars[1318] and photonic crystal cavities[1925] etc. The fusion of QDs and micro-cavities in semiconductors has been delivering enhanced light-matter interactions at single-photon level, which enables the realization of Purcell-enhanced high-performance single-photon sources, vacuum Rabi splitting and few-photon nonlinearities via cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED) effects. However, due to the random nature of the self-assembly during the epitaxial growth, the QDs inevitably exhibit a pronounced inhomogeneous broadening over a large spectral range (typically 50 nm). Therefore, achieving spectral resonances between the single quantum emitters and the high-quality cavity modes turns to be very challenging without post-tuning techniques. Despite the tremendous successes have been realized by either changing the QD emission wavelength via tuning the external physical parameters (e.g., temperature[26], electric field[27, 28] and strain[2931]) or tuning cavity modes with gas depositions[32], it is still not yet feasible to independently tune multiple QDs or cavity modes in the same semiconductor chip. Consequently, developing broadband photonic nanostructures that is insensitive to the QD spectral inhomogeneity is highly desirable for readily achieving high-performance quantum light sources, especially when simultaneous coupling of multiple QDs to photonic nanostructure is involved in many-body quantum experiments.

    In this review article, we summarize recently developed broadband photonic nanostructures that are designed for coupling to semiconductor QDs and their applications in high-quality non-classic light generations. The design principle, fabrication process and device performances of the photonic nanowires, photonic crystal waveguides (PCWs), micro-lens and circular Bragg gratings (CBGs) will be discussed in the following.

    2. Waveguide-based broadband photonic structures

    2.1. Photonic nanowires

    Nanowires were proposed to working as a waveguide because of their considerably enhanced light extraction efficiency along the axial direction. As illustrated in Figs. 1(a) and 1(b), a nanowire with the optimized diameter can efficiently funnel the spontaneous emission from QDs into the fundamental HE11 mode and suppress the coupling to other radiative modes[33, 34]. A bottom mirror (e.g. a dielectric/metal mirror)[35] is used to reflect the downwards emission back into the guided mode. The QD-to-mirror distance should be carefully designed to obtain an antinode in the electric field at the position of QDs. In order to efficiently collect the emitted photons with an objective or fiber, a conical tapered tip[36] is optimized so that the mode will be adiabatically expanded outside the nanowire. Theoretically, high beta factors that quantify the fraction of the emission coupling to a targeted mode above 0.9[34, 37] are achievable over a remarkably broad spectral range of 70 nm at λ = 950 nm[33]. The extraction efficiency for the photons from nanowires to an objective with a numerical aperture NA = 0.85 could go as high as around 95%[33]. Additionally, the Gaussian far-field emission pattern of the propagating mode enables the possibility of realizing high coupling efficiency to an optical fiber[3840]. Thus QD-in-nanowire structure is an appealing candidate for the realization of bright quantum light sources.

    (Color online) (a–b) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image (a) of a top–down tapered GaAs nanowire waveguide with an embedded InAs QD, together with the intensity profile for a 2D-cut along the nanowire growth axis by FDTD simulation (b). (c–d) SEM image (c) of a top–down GaAs photonic trumpet with an embedded InAs QD, together with the intensity profile for a 2D-cut along the nanowire growth axis by FDTD simulation (d). (e) SEM image of a bottom–up tapered InP nanowire waveguide containing a single InAsP QD[51], reprinted with permission, Copyright 2012, Springer Nature.

    Figure 1.(Color online) (a–b) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image (a) of a top–down tapered GaAs nanowire waveguide with an embedded InAs QD, together with the intensity profile for a 2D-cut along the nanowire growth axis by FDTD simulation (b). (c–d) SEM image (c) of a top–down GaAs photonic trumpet with an embedded InAs QD, together with the intensity profile for a 2D-cut along the nanowire growth axis by FDTD simulation (d). (e) SEM image of a bottom–up tapered InP nanowire waveguide containing a single InAsP QD[51], reprinted with permission, Copyright 2012, Springer Nature.

    Top-down and bottom-up methods are mostly employed to fabricate QD-in-nanowires. The top-down approach is based on epitaxial growth of QD materials combined with plasma dry etching technique[41] while the bottom-up approach can directly form nanowires by vapor-liquid-solid (VLS)[42, 43] and selective-area epitaxy (SAE)[44] growth modes. Compared to bottom-up growth, the nanowire geometry (e.g. the tapered tip and the bottom mirror) can be engineered in a large degree of freedom in top-down fabrication, making it possible to achieve both nanowires with needle taper and photonic trumpet with inversed conical taper (Figs. 1(c) and 1(d)). The latter shows robustness against variations in the taper angle thus offers a reliable way to improve the photon collection. Highly-efficient single photon sources (SPSs) were experimentally demonstrated firstly in nanowire antenna with an extraction efficiency of 72%[45], and later in photonic trumpet with an extraction efficiency of 75% and an external coupling efficiency to a Gaussian beam as high as 0.58[46]. A monolithic optical-fiber-coupled SPS was also achieved via directly transferring a nanowire trumpet onto the core of a fiber pigtail, showing an external collection efficiency of QD emission of 5.8%[47]. Additionally, the QD emitter coupling to mechanical modes of the nanowire trumpet structure[48, 49] offers a new degree of freedom with potential application in exciton-phonon interaction, precision quantum sensing. However, the yield of devices in the top-down approach has been hindered by the randomness in the locations of self-assembled QDs. From this perspective, the bottom-up growth method offers a straightforward and deterministic fabrication approach with more choices in the material compositions. As shown in Fig. 1(e), the most popular configuration consists of QD positioned on the NW axis, forming an axial heterostructure. In general, Ⅲ–Ⅴ nanowires prefer the [111] crystalline orientation[50]. One of the most widely studied material systems is InAsP QDs in InP nanowires. A bottom-up-grown nanowire with a fine taper toward the tip (tapering angle approximately 2°) and a bottom gold mirror has been reported by Reimer et al. in 2012, yielding an overall efficiency of 42%[51]. It has also been successfully demonstrated that the grown antenna can be used to obtain Gaussian far-field emission pattern and high coupling efficiency of 93% to an optical fiber[39].

    High symmetry QDs fabricated in the [111] growth direction should exhibit vanishing FSS and, therefore, could emit entangled photon pairs via the biexciton-exciton cascaded radiative process[52, 53]. A QD entangle photon source with an extraction efficiency of 18 ± 3%, an entanglement fidelity of 0.859 ± 0.006 and concurrence of 0.80 ± 0.02 has been realized by using a position-controlled QD in a broadband nanowire antenna[54]. Furthermore, QD emission tuning is also an important issue in QD-in-nanowires, as it is still challenging to obtain QD SPSs with specific wavelengths. Strain tuning of QD emission has been demonstrated with bottom-up nanowire by transferring the nanowires onto an piezoelectric crystal[55] or by an amorphous capping shell[56].

    Recently, a large static strain tuning of up to 25 meV for a QD embedded in a nanowire trumpet stressed by nanomanipulators[56] has been reported. Despite these impressive improvements on the photon extraction efficiency, the fiber-coupling efficiency and the emission wavelength tuning, quantum light sources based on nanowire with very high indistinguishability (> 99%) remains elusive. Spectral diffusion[57, 58] induced by fluctuating charges and defects around the QDs inevitably introduce extra dephasing process, resulting in reductions of the photon indistinguishability. Until now, the highest two-photon interference visibility achieved is 0.83 at 300 mK by excitation above the InP bandgap with high intensity to fill the charge traps[59]. Further reaching the Fourier-transform-limited photons may rely on surface passivation techniques[60, 61], resonant excitation techniques[2, 62-64] or accelerating the quantum dot emission via nanowire with the Purcell effect[40].

    2.2. Photonic crystal waveguides

    Instead of efficiently coupling the quantum light from semiconductor material to the free space optics, PCW serves as a very effective tool of routing the single-photons in the semiconductor chips due to its planar geometry.

    The PCs discussed in this work refer to thin semiconductor membranes with periodically etched air holes which create the photonic bandgap for the photons travelling in the membranes (below the light line). The vertical confinement of photons is governed by the total internal reflection between the semiconductor and air interface. The band structure of an infinite PCW is shown in Fig. 2(a). By leaving a line of the air holes, a waveguide mode can be created in the photonic band gap, as illustrated in Fig. 2(b). The solid and dashed lines corresponds to the first and second waveguide modes within the TE-like band gap. The gray shaded area above the light line represents the continuum of radiation modes. A SEM image of a representative PCW device is shown in Fig. 2(c). Interestingly, the density of the optical state of the waveguide modes is greatly enhanced at the band edge, resulting in a pronounced Purcell factor for the QDs that couples to the waveguide modes[65]. Similar to the photonic nanowires, the couplings of QDs to the radiation modes are greatly suppressed due to the 2D photonic bandgap. By simultaneous enhancing the coupling to the PCW mode and suppressing the leakages to the radiation modes, the spontaneous emission factor (beta factor) of QDs to the targeted propagating mode could be reaching to near-unity.

    (Color online) (a) Illustration of a finite PCW with a single QD embedded. (b) The band structure and waveguide modes of PCWs. (c) SEM picture of a PCW. (d) Decay dynamics for QDs that couple and uncouple to the PCWs[68], reprinted with permission, Copyright 2014, American Physical Society.

    Figure 2.(Color online) (a) Illustration of a finite PCW with a single QD embedded. (b) The band structure and waveguide modes of PCWs. (c) SEM picture of a PCW. (d) Decay dynamics for QDs that couple and uncouple to the PCWs[68], reprinted with permission, Copyright 2014, American Physical Society.

    The first unequivocal experimental demonstration of highly efficient broadband coupling of InAs QDs to GaAs PCWs was shown by Hansen et al.[66], in which the decay rates of QDs that couple and uncouple to the waveguide modes were measured with a confocal micro-PL setup. A beta factor up to 0.89 was extracted from the measured decay rates. Measurements from QDs emitting at different wavelengths in the waveguides reveal a large operation bandwidth of ~20 nm.

    Despite the impressive beta factors demonstrated in this work, the collection of photons coupling to the propagating waveguide modes was rather inefficient in a confocal micro-PL setup. Only a small portion of photons that couples to the waveguide can be collected by the objective above the waveguides due to some out-of-plane scattering, which results in a very low photon count rates in single-photon detectors. Therefore, it is highly desirable to measure decay rates of QDs that coupled to the PCWs from the end of the waveguides. In the measurements by Laucht et al.[67], the photon count rate from the edge of the waveguides is 55 times higher than that measured from the top, further highlighting the efficient coupling of QDs to the propagating modes. With further optimization of the side collection from waveguides[68], e.g., implementing grating coupler and taper structures, a near-unity (0.98) beta factor was experimentally achieved, approaching to the theoretical limit as shown in Fig. 2(d).

    In addition, QDs with beta > 0.9 were measured across the large spectral range over 20 nm. Although the PCWs funnel the single-photons emitted by QDs to the targeted propagating waveguide modes, the photon count rates in the single-photon detectors is still far from satisfactory. This is mostly due to the mode mismatch between the modes with nanoscale cross-section in the PCWs and the single-mode fiber with a core diameter of a few microns. Such a technical challenge was recently handled by extracting photons in the PCWs via specially prepared tapered fibers. An optical fiber was tapered down to a few hundred nanometers to phase match with the waveguide modes. By deliberately making local minimal height in the tapered fiber and accurately launching to the waveguides regime, ~80% of photons in the waveguide was guided to the fiber with a single-photon count rate up to 4.38 MHz obtained in the single photon detector, corresponding to a source efficiency more than 10% [69]. The single-photon count rates obtained in the fiber-coupled PCWs devices are already comparable to the sources based on cavities. With the advantage of broad operation bandwidth, the PCWs could serve as a reliable source for photonic quantum simulations/computation by further improving the coherent properties of the photons, for instance, exploiting resonant excitations and charge stabilization techniques.

    3. Lens-based broadband photonic structures

    3.1. Solid immersion lens

    The most straightforward way to increase the light extraction is to use a lens to guide the emitted photons to the collection optics. For semiconductor QDs, solid immersion lens (SIL) made of high refractive index materials represents a viable option. Zirconia lens is widely employed in enhancing the photon count rate. But compared with the GaAs material, the refractive index of Zirconia is relatively small, leading to an insufficient extraction of QDs photons. Gallium phosphide (GaP) semi-sphere lens (with refractive coefficient similar to GaAs) is recently exploited by Chen and co-workers[70]. It is worth to note that the GaP lens used in their experiment is large in diameter (in the order of millimeter). To prevent large air gaps between the QDs and the lens, they stick the QD-containing membrane to the lens instead of placing the lens on the GaAs substrate, as the thin/flexible membrane could adapt itself to the ‘wavy’ bottom surface of GaP lens as is shown in Fig. 3(a). The back side of the membrane is sputtered with a silver layer as a mirror. They demonstrate an extraction efficiency of 65% for single photons and 0.37 pair per pulse for entangled photons.

    (Color online) (a) The dielectric antenna consists of, from bottom to top, a silver layer, an AlGaAs membrane (with embedded QDs), a low refractive index PMMA spacer and the GaP SIL. Most photon emission is funneled into the GaP SIL[70], reprinted with permission, Copyright 2018, Springer Nature. (b) Comparison of the photon-extraction efficiency for different micro-lens mirror structures. With DBR bottom mirror, the photon extraction efficiency reaches to a plateau value of only around 23%, while with a gold bottom mirror, it is improved to more than 80% for large numerical aperture collection objectives[71], reprinted with permission, Copyright 2015, Springer Nature. (c) Schematic view of the QD micro-lens/micro-objective device. A micro-objective is printed directed on top of a QD micro-lens[73], reprinted with permission, Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.

    Figure 3.(Color online) (a) The dielectric antenna consists of, from bottom to top, a silver layer, an AlGaAs membrane (with embedded QDs), a low refractive index PMMA spacer and the GaP SIL. Most photon emission is funneled into the GaP SIL[70], reprinted with permission, Copyright 2018, Springer Nature. (b) Comparison of the photon-extraction efficiency for different micro-lens mirror structures. With DBR bottom mirror, the photon extraction efficiency reaches to a plateau value of only around 23%, while with a gold bottom mirror, it is improved to more than 80% for large numerical aperture collection objectives[71], reprinted with permission, Copyright 2015, Springer Nature. (c) Schematic view of the QD micro-lens/micro-objective device. A micro-objective is printed directed on top of a QD micro-lens[73], reprinted with permission, Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.

    3.2. Micro-lens

    Despite the simplicity and the effectiveness of the SIL approach, the large footprint of the macroscopic lens prevents the possibility of addressing individual QDs independently. The idea of the lens can be transformed from macroscopic SIL to microscopic lens, i.e., micro-lens.

    Similar to SIL, the micro-lens shapes the propagation of the emitted photons, effectively guiding the photons towards the collection lens. With a backside reflector, those photons not caught by the nanostructure can be reflected back to the lens and significantly improve the device performances.

    By deterministically placing singe QDs in the micro-lens with a bottom distributed Bragg mirror (DBR), single-photon collection efficiency up to 23% across a broad operation bandwidth is observed (red line in Fig. 3(b))[71]. Notably, the photon indistinguishability achieved in this lens is as high as 80% even under saturation, which indicates the great potential of micro-lens for generating highly-coherent single-photons. The bandwidth and the efficiency of such a structure are basically limited by the bottom DBR that has a relatively limited bandwidth and a finite acceptance angle[72]. By replacing the DBR with a broadband metallic mirror, the calculated collection efficiency can be boosted to up to 86% as is indicated by the black line in Fig. 3(b), which is among the state-of-the-art results. The device’s performance can be further improved with the implementation of high-NA micro-objectives[73] that are aligned to the micro-lens and written with sub-micrometer accuracy (Fig. 3(c)) by means of 3D femtosecond direct laser writing[74, 75].

    4. Cavity based photonic structures: circular Bragg gratings

    Apart from generating single-photons, the polarization entangled photon pairs can also be deterministically triggered from semiconductors by using the bi-exciton(XX)/exciton(X) cascaded radiative recombination process. Generally, the X and XX transitions are not frequency-degenerate, resulting in a wavelength separation of X and XX photons for a few nanometers[70, 76]. In order to obtain strongly-entangled photon pairs with high-brightness and indistinguishability, photonic nanostructures exhibiting Purcell enhancements simultaneously for both X and XX are long being sought.

    One of the clever solutions is to use a low-Q circular Bragg grating (CBG) resonator proposed by Davanco et al.[7]. As shown in Figs. 4(a) and 4(c), the CBG is made by suspended semiconductor membranes with shallowly etched circular trenches. When a QD is embedded in the center of the CBG, the in-plane single-photons are partially reflected back to center, forming a low-Q cavity and also scattered preferentially upwards, enabling highly directional emission. In the early CBG devices, collection efficiency around 10% was demonstrated due to the non-ideal positions of QDs respective to the CBG center. Thanks to the cryogenic photo-luminescence imaging technique, it is feasible to optically locate the positions of the QDs and deterministically fabricate the device around them[6, 77]. A deterministically fabricated CBG device shows a collection efficiency of 49% with an NA of 0.4. The collection efficiency of CBGs is theoretically limited to 80% with a high NA objective (0.7) because of the photon leakage to the bottom of the devices[77]. Such a limitation was recently broken by the development of hybrid CBG devices in which a CBG sits on top of a highly-efficient broadband reflector consisting of a thin SiO2 layer and a gold film, see Fig. 4(d). As illustrated in Fig. 4(e), photons leaking down to the bottom of CBG are efficiently reflected back to the device regime and constructively interfere with the upwards emitted photons, resulting in a theoretical collection efficiency up to 90% over ~33 nm and a calculated Purcell factor of > 2 for a bandwidth of ~ 13 nm [3]. The unique combinations of collection efficiency and Purcell enhancements over a broad spectral regime are particularly appealing for generating high-performance entangled photon pairs. By harnessing the broadband feature of the hybrid CBG, strongly-entangled photons with unprecedented brightness and photon indistinguishability have been very recently achieved in both InGaAs QDs and GaAs QDs, immediately opening possibilities for efficiency-demanding experiments such as Boson sampling and entanglement swapping[3, 78].

    (Color online) (a–c) SEM images of CBG structure[7], (a–c) are reprinted with permission, Copyright 2011, AIP Publishing. (d) The schematic of the CBR-HBR. (e) Simulated Purcell facor and collection efficiency of the CBR-HBR[3], (d) and (e) are reprinted with permission, Copyright 2019, Nature Springer.

    Figure 4.(Color online) (a–c) SEM images of CBG structure[7], (a–c) are reprinted with permission, Copyright 2011, AIP Publishing. (d) The schematic of the CBR-HBR. (e) Simulated Purcell facor and collection efficiency of the CBR-HBR[3], (d) and (e) are reprinted with permission, Copyright 2019, Nature Springer.

    5. Conclusion

    Last decades have witnessed the race of different photonic structures for the realizations of semiconductor quantum light sources. The broadband photonic structures greatly reduce the challenge of spectral resonance between the QDs and the structures which is particularly technically difficult for the high-Q cavities. In addition, the propagating mode feature of the waveguide based structure offers a unique opportunity of routing light in planar chips, facilitating the on-chip integration of multiple functional devices. The unique combination of broadband enhancements of spontaneous emission rate and collection efficiency simultaneously further enables the on-demand generation of non-classic state beyond single-photons, i.e., entangled photon pairs. With further developments of the broadband photonic structures, more advanced quantum photonic experiments could be envisioned in the near future, e.g., two-photon quantum random walking and multi-photon boson sampling etc.

    Acknowledgments

    This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFA0306100), the National Natural Science Foundations of China (Nos. 11874437,11704424), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Nos. 2018B030311027, 2017A030310004, 2016A030310216) and Guangzhou Science and Technology Project (No. 201805010004). the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 60123456).

    References

    [1] D Huber, M Reindl, l J Aberl et al. Semiconductor quantum dots as an ideal source of polarization-entangled photon pairs on-demand: a review. J Opt, 20, 073002(2018).

    [2] Y M He, e Y He, i Y J Wei et al. On-demand semiconductor single-photon source with near-unity indistinguishability. Nat Nanotechnol, 8, 213(2013).

    [3] J Liu, u R Su, i Y Wei et al. A solid-state source of strongly entangled photon pairs with high brightness and indistinguishability. Nat Nanotechnol, 14, 586(2019).

    [4] P Senellart, n G Solomon, A White. High-performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources. Nat Nanotechnol, 12, 1026(2017).

    [5] L Hanschke, r K A Fischer, S Appel et al. Quantum dot single-photon sources with ultra-low multi-photon probability. npj Quantum Inform, 4, 43(2018).

    [6] S Kolatschek, S Hepp, M Sartison et al. Deterministic fabrication of circular Bragg gratings coupled to single quantum emitters via the combination of in-situ optical lithography and electron-beam lithography. J Appl Phys, 125, 045701(2019).

    [7] M Davanço, M T Rakher, D Schuh et al. A circular dielectric grating for vertical extraction of single quantum dot emission. Appl Phys Lett, 99, 041102(2011).

    [8] W L Barnes, G Björk, J M Gérard et al. Solid-state single photon sources: light collection strategies. Eur Phys J D, 18, 197(2002).

    [9] K Srinivasan, M Borselli, n T J Johnson et al. Optical loss and lasing characteristics of high-quality-factor AlGaAs microdisk resonators with embedded quantum dots. Appl Phys Lett, 86, 151106(2005).

    [10] K Srinivasan, O Painter. Linear and nonlinear optical spectroscopy of a strongly coupled microdisk–quantum dot system. Nature, 450, 862(2007).

    [11] T Zhou, M Tang, G Xiang et al. Ultra-low threshold InAs/GaAs quantum dot microdisk lasers on planar on-axis Si (001) substrates. Optica, 6, 430(2019).

    [12] P Michler, A Kiraz, C Becher et al. A quantum dot single-photon turnstile device. Science, 290, 2282(2000).

    [13] S Liu, Y Wei, R Su et al. A deterministic quantum dot micropillar single photon source with > 65% extraction efficiency based on fluorescence imaging method. Sci Rep, 7, 13986(2017).

    [14] C Böckler, S Reitzenstein, C Kistner et al. Electrically driven high-Q quantum dot-micropillar cavities. Appl Phys Lett, 92, 091107(2008).

    [15] T Heindel, C Schneider, M Lermer et al. Electrically driven quantum dot-micropillar single photon source with 34% overall efficiency. Appl Phys Lett, 96, 011107(2010).

    [16] C Schneider, P Gold, S Reitzenstein et al. Quantum dot micropillar cavities with quality factors exceeding 250,000. Appl Phys B, 122, 19(2016).

    [17] N Somaschi, V Giesz, L De Santis et al. Near-optimal single-photon sources in the solid state. Nat Photonics, 10, 340(2016).

    [18] H Wang, n Z C Duan, i Y H Li et al. Near-transform-limited single photons from an efficient solid-state quantum emitter. Phys Rev Lett, 116, 213601(2016).

    [19] B Ellis, r M A Mayer, G Shambat et al. Ultralow-threshold electrically pumped quantum-dot photonic-crystal nanocavity laser. Nat Photonics, 5, 297(2011).

    [20] Y Gong, B Ellis, G Shambat et al. Nanobeam photonic crystal cavity quantum dot laser. Opt Express, 18, 8781(2010).

    [21] J Vučković, Y Yamamoto. Photonic crystal microcavities for cavity quantum electrodynamics with a single quantum dot. Appl Phys Lett, 82, 2374(2003).

    [22] K J Hennessy, C P Reese, A Badolato et al. High-Q photonic crystal cavities with embedded quantum dots. Proc SPIE, 5359, 210(2004).

    [23] Y Song, M Liu, Y Zhang et al. High-Q photonic crystal slab nanocavity with an asymmetric nanohole in the center for QED. J Opt Soc Am B, 28, 265(2011).

    [24] D Englund, D Fattal, E Waks et al. Controlling the spontaneous emission rate of single quantum dots in a two-dimensional photonic crystal. Phys Rev Lett, 95, 013904(2005).

    [25] K Hennessy, A Badolato, M Winger et al. Quantum nature of a strongly coupled single quantum dot-cavity system. Nature, 445, 896(2007).

    [26] D J P Ellis, n R M Stevenson, g R J Young et al. Control of fine-structure splitting of individual InAs quantum dots by rapid thermal annealing. Appl Phys Lett, 90, 011907(2007).

    [27] W Heller, U Bockelmann, G Abstreiter. Electric-field effects on excitons in quantum dots. Phys Rev B, 57, 6270(1998).

    [28] A J Bennett, y M A Pooley, n R M Stevenson et al. Electric-field-induced coherent coupling of the exciton states in a single quantum dot. Nat Physics, 6, 947(2010).

    [29] F Schäffler. High-mobility Si and Ge structures. Semicond Sci Technol, 12, 1515(1997).

    [30] C Y Hung, T E Schlesinger, d M L Reed. Piezoelectrically induced stress tuning of electro-optic devices. Appl Phys Lett, 59, 3598(1991).

    [31] F Ding, R Singh, f J D Plumhof et al. Tuning the exciton binding energies in single self-assembled InGaAs/GaAs quantum dots by piezoelectric-induced biaxial stress. Phys Rev Lett, 104, 067405(2010).

    [32]

    [33] I Friedler, C Sauvan, n J P Hugonin et al. Solid-state single photon sources: the nanowire antenna. Opt Express, 17, 2095(2009).

    [34] J Bleuse, J Claudon, M Creasey et al. Inhibition, enhancement, and control of spontaneous emission in photonic nanowires. Phys Rev Lett, 106, 103601(2011).

    [35] I Friedler, P Lalanne, J P Hugonin et al. Efficient photonic mirrors for semiconductor nanowires. Opt Lett, 33, 2635(2008).

    [36] N Gregersen, n T R Nielsen, J Claudon et al. Controlling the emission profile of a nanowire with a conical taper. Opt Lett, 33, 1693(2008).

    [37] J Claudon, N Gregersen, P Lalanne et al. Harnessing light with photonic nanowires: fundamentals and applications to quantum optics. ChemPhysChem, 14, 2393(2013).

    [38] P Stepanov, a A Delga, N Gregersen et al. Highly directive and Gaussian far-field emission from " giant” photonic trumpets. Appl Phys Lett, 107, 141106(2015).

    [39] G Bulgarini, r M E Reimer, k M B Bavinck et al. Nanowire waveguides launching single photons in a Gaussian mode for ideal fiber coupling. Nano Lett, 14, 4102(2014).

    [40] N Gregersen, D P S McCutcheon, J Mørk et al. A broadband tapered nanocavity for efficient nonclassical light emission. Opt Express, 24, 20904(2016).

    [41] T Mårtensson, P Carlberg, M Borgström et al. Nanowire arrays defined by nanoimprint lithography. Nano Lett, 4, 699(2004).

    [42] R S Wagner, s W C Ellis. Vapor-liquid-solid mechanism of single crystal growth. Appl Phys Lett, 4, 89(1964).

    [43] T Mårtensson, M Borgström, W Seifert et al. Fabrication of individually seeded nanowire arrays by vapour–liquid–solid growth. Nanotechnology, 14, 1255(2003).

    [44] Q Gao, D Saxena, F Wang et al. Selective-area epitaxy of pure wurtzite InP nanowires: high quantum efficiency and room-temperature lasing. Nano Lett, 14, 5206(2014).

    [45] J Claudon, J Bleuse, k N S Malik et al. A highly efficient single-photon source based on a quantum dot in a photonic nanowire. Nat Photonics, 4, 174(2010).

    [46] M Munsch, k N S Malik, E Dupuy et al. Dielectric GaAs antenna ensuring an efficient broadband coupling between an InAs quantum dot and a gaussian optical beam. Phys Rev Lett, 110, 177402(2013).

    [47] D Cadeddu, J Teissier, n F R Braakman et al. A fiber-coupled quantum-dot on a photonic tip. Appl Phys Lett, 108, 011112(2016).

    [48] I Yeo, P L de Assis, A Gloppe et al. Strain-mediated coupling in a quantum dot-mechanical oscillator hybrid system. Nat Nanotechnol, 9, 106(2013).

    [49] M Munsch, n A V Kuhlmann, D Cadeddu et al. Resonant driving of a single photon emitter embedded in a mechanical oscillator. Nat Commun, 8, 76(2017).

    [50] S A Fortuna, X Li. Metal-catalyzed semiconductor nanowires: a review on the control of growth directions. Semicond Sci Technol, 25, 024005(2010).

    [51] M E Reimer, G Bulgarini, N Akopian et al. Bright single-photon sources in bottom-up tailored nanowires. Nat Commun, 3, 737(2012).

    [52] R Singh, G Bester. Nanowire quantum dots as an ideal source of entangled photon pairs. Phys Rev Lett, 103, 063601(2009).

    [53] T Huber, A Predojević, M Khoshnegar et al. Polarization entangled photons from quantum dots embedded in nanowires. Nano Lett, 14, 7107(2014).

    [54] M A M Versteegh, M E Reimer, K D Jöns et al. Observation of strongly entangled photon pairs from a nanowire quantum dot. Nat Commun, 5, 5298(2014).

    [55] Y Chen, I E Zadeh, Jöns K D et al. Controlling the exciton energy of a nanowire quantum dot by strain fields. Appl Phys Lett, 108, 182103(2016).

    [56] P Stepanov, M Elzo-Aizarna, J Bleuse et al. Large and uniform optical emission shifts in quantum dots strained along their growth axis. Nano Lett, 16, 3215(2016).

    [57] G Sallen, A Tribu, T Aichele et al. Subnanosecond spectral diffusion of a single quantum dot in a nanowire. Phys Rev B, 84, 041405(2011).

    [58] M Holmes, S Kako, K Choi et al. Spectral diffusion and its influence on the emission linewidths of site-controlled GaN nanowire quantum dots. Phys Rev B, 92, 115447(2015).

    [59] M E Reimer, G Bulgarini, A Fognini et al. Overcoming power broadening of the quantum dot emission in a pure wurtzite nanowire. Phys Rev B, 93, 195316(2016).

    [60] I Yeo, k N S Malik, M Munsch et al. Surface effects in a semiconductor photonic nanowire and spectral stability of an embedded single quantum dot. Appl Phys Lett, 99, 233106(2011).

    [61] C C Chang, i C Y Chi, M Yao et al. Electrical and optical characterization of surface passivation in GaAs nanowires. Nano Lett, 12, 4484(2012).

    [62] M Müller, S Bounouar, K D Jöns et al. On-demand generation of indistinguishable polarization-entangled photon pairs. Nat Photonics, 8, 224(2014).

    [63] H Jayakumar, A Predojević, T Huber et al. Deterministic photon pairs and coherent optical control of a single quantum dot. Phys Rev Lett, 110, 135505(2013).

    [64] A V Kuhlmann, l J H Prechtel, J Houel et al. Transform-limited single photons from a single quantum dot. Nat Commun, 6, 8204(2015).

    [65] V S C M Rao, S Hughes. Single quantum dot spontaneous emission in a finite-size photonic crystal waveguide: proposal for an efficient " on chip” single photon gun. Phys Rev Lett, 99, 193901(2007).

    [66] T Lund-Hansen, S Stobbe, B Julsgaard et al. Experimental realization of highly efficient broadband coupling of single quantum dots to a photonic crystal waveguide. Phys Rev Lett, 101, 113903(2008).

    [67] A Laucht, S Pütz, T Günthner et al. A waveguide-coupled on-chip single-photon source. Phys Rev X, 2, 011014(2012).

    [68] M Arcari, I Söllner, A Javadi et al. Near-unity coupling efficiency of a quantum emitter to a photonic crystal waveguide. Phys Rev Lett, 113, 093603(2014).

    [69] R S Daveau, K C Balram, T Pregnolato et al. Efficient fiber-coupled single-photon source based on quantum dots in a photonic-crystal waveguide. Optica, 4, 178(2017).

    [70] Y Chen, M Zopf, R Keil et al. Highly-efficient extraction of entangled photons from quantum dots using a broadband optical antenna. Nat Commun, 9, 2994(2018).

    [71] M Gschrey, A Thoma, P Schnauber et al. Highly indistinguishable photons from deterministic quantum-dot microlenses utilizing three-dimensional in situ electron-beam lithography. Nat Commun, 6, 7662(2015).

    [72] S Fischbach, A Kaganskiy, r E B Y Tauscher et al. Efficient single-photon source based on a deterministically fabricated single quantum dot-microstructure with backside gold mirror. Appl Phys Lett, 111, 011106(2017).

    [73] S Fischbach, A Schlehahn, A Thoma et al. Single quantum dot with microlens and 3D-printed micro-objective as integrated bright single-photon source. ACS Photonics, 4, 1327(2017).

    [74] A W Schell, J Kaschke, J Fischer et al. Three-dimensional quantum photonic elements based on single nitrogen vacancy-centres in laser-written microstructures. Sci Rep, 3, 1577(2013).

    [75] T Gissibl, S Thiele, A Herkommer et al. Two-photon direct laser writing of ultracompact multi-lens objectives. Nat Photonics, 10, 554(2016).

    [76] D Huber, M Reindl, Y Huo et al. Highly indistinguishable and strongly entangled photons from symmetric GaAs quantum dots. Nat Commun, 8, 15506(2017).

    [77] L Sapienza, M Davanço, A Badolato et al. Nanoscale optical positioning of single quantum dots for bright and pure single-photon emission. Nat Commun, 6, 7833(2015).

    [78] H Wang, H Hu, g T H Chung et al. On-demand semiconductor source of entangled photons which simultaneously has high fidelity, efficiency, and indistinguishability. Phys Rev Lett, 122, 113602(2019).

    Zhe He, Jiawei Yang, Lidan Zhou, Yan Chen, Tianming Zhao, Ying Yu, Jin Liu. Broadband photonic structures for quantum light sources[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2019, 40(7): 071905
    Download Citation