• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 5, Issue 2, 124 (2017)
Sheng Yu1 and Tao Chu1、2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory on Integrated Optoelectronics, Institute of Semiconductors, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100083, China
  • 2College of Information Science and Electronic Engineering, Zhejiang University, #38, Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.5.000124 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Sheng Yu, Tao Chu. Electrical nonlinearity in silicon modulators based on reversed PN junctions[J]. Photonics Research, 2017, 5(2): 124 Copy Citation Text show less
    (a) Equivalent circuit for the reversed PN junction and (b) relationship between the depletion capacitance and reverse bias voltage.
    Fig. 1. (a) Equivalent circuit for the reversed PN junction and (b) relationship between the depletion capacitance and reverse bias voltage.
    (a) Cross-section of a silicon phase shifter based on a vertical PN junction. (b–d) Calculated nonlinear relationships of the optical phase change, absorption coefficient change, and depletion capacitance versus the different reverse bias voltages and the fitting results.
    Fig. 2. (a) Cross-section of a silicon phase shifter based on a vertical PN junction. (b–d) Calculated nonlinear relationships of the optical phase change, absorption coefficient change, and depletion capacitance versus the different reverse bias voltages and the fitting results.
    Simulated spectrum of the EN output Vc(t): (a) power distribution and (b) phase distribution.
    Fig. 3. Simulated spectrum of the EN output Vc(t): (a) power distribution and (b) phase distribution.
    Composition of the spectrum of Pout(t).
    Fig. 4. Composition of the spectrum of Pout(t).
    (a) Structure of the simulated MZM, (b) CDR3 under different phase biases for the nonlinear model with EN and the conventional nonlinear model without EN, and (c) SFDR results for the nonlinear model with EN and the conventional nonlinear model without EN.
    Fig. 5. (a) Structure of the simulated MZM, (b) CDR3 under different phase biases for the nonlinear model with EN and the conventional nonlinear model without EN, and (c) SFDR results for the nonlinear model with EN and the conventional nonlinear model without EN.
    (a) Optimized CDR3 under different series resistances and (b) SFDR when the series resistance is 1 or 10 Ω.
    Fig. 6. (a) Optimized CDR3 under different series resistances and (b) SFDR when the series resistance is 1 or 10  Ω.
    Normalized CDR3 versus the driving frequency (the black line shows that the linearity is frequency-independent without EN).
    Fig. 7. Normalized CDR3 versus the driving frequency (the black line shows that the linearity is frequency-independent without EN).
    Third nonlinear coefficient versus the phase bias.
    Fig. 8. Third nonlinear coefficient versus the phase bias.
    Sheng Yu, Tao Chu. Electrical nonlinearity in silicon modulators based on reversed PN junctions[J]. Photonics Research, 2017, 5(2): 124
    Download Citation