• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 16, Issue 10, 100605 (2018)
Xiaojie Shen1, Jiahao Huo1、2, Xian Zhou1、2、*, Kangping Zhong3, Jinhui Yuan2, Jiajing Tu1, Keping Long1, Changyuan Yu2, Alan Pak Tao Lau4, and Chao Lu2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Artificial Intelligence, University of Science and Technology Beijing (USTB), Beijing 100083, China
  • 2Department of Electronic and Information Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong 999077, China
  • 3MACOM Technology Solutions, Shenzhen 518000, China
  • 4Department of Electrical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong 999077, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL201816.100605 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xiaojie Shen, Jiahao Huo, Xian Zhou, Kangping Zhong, Jinhui Yuan, Jiajing Tu, Keping Long, Changyuan Yu, Alan Pak Tao Lau, Chao Lu. Performance comparison among three different Stokes vector direct-detection receivers[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2018, 16(10): 100605 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    Stokes vectors direct detection (SV-DD) is an effective solution for short-reach optical communications. In this Letter, we investigate two-dimensional-modulation direct-detection systems based on three Stokes vector receivers (SVRs). The influences of three key factors including the states-of-polarization (SOP), the splitting ratio of the coupler, and the excess loss (EL) are studied in detail. It is shown that the splitting ratio for achieving optimum performance will be changed with SOP and EL conditions. Among these SVRs, the 3×3 coupler-based receiver with its optimal splitting ratio shows the best bit error rate performance and stability against the change of SOP.
    S0=|EX|2+|EY|2,S2=2Re{EX·EY*},S1=|EX|2|EY|2,S3=2Im{EX·EY*},(1)

    View in Article

    SR=MI,(2)

    View in Article

    M1=[11γ0011γ11γ0011γ02γ00002γ0],M2=[11γ0011γ11γ0011γ11γ4γ011γ11γ04γ11γ],M3=[111121γ111103γ03γ01γ2γ1γ],(3)

    View in Article

    SR=HST+NS,(4)

    View in Article

    H=[10000cos2ϕsin2ϕ00sin2ϕcos2ϕ00001],(5)

    View in Article

    S˜T=H1HST+H1NS=ST+N˜,(6)

    View in Article

    N˜=H1NS=H1MN.(7)

    View in Article

    N˜=H1MN=[10000cos2ϕsin2ϕ00sin2ϕcos2ϕ00001]1×[11γ0011γ11γ0011γ02γ00002γ0]×[n1n2n3n4].(8)

    View in Article

    Xiaojie Shen, Jiahao Huo, Xian Zhou, Kangping Zhong, Jinhui Yuan, Jiajing Tu, Keping Long, Changyuan Yu, Alan Pak Tao Lau, Chao Lu. Performance comparison among three different Stokes vector direct-detection receivers[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2018, 16(10): 100605
    Download Citation