• Chinese Optics Letters
  • Vol. 16, Issue 10, 100605 (2018)
Xiaojie Shen1, Jiahao Huo1、2, Xian Zhou1、2、*, Kangping Zhong3, Jinhui Yuan2, Jiajing Tu1, Keping Long1, Changyuan Yu2, Alan Pak Tao Lau4, and Chao Lu2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Artificial Intelligence, University of Science and Technology Beijing (USTB), Beijing 100083, China
  • 2Department of Electronic and Information Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong 999077, China
  • 3MACOM Technology Solutions, Shenzhen 518000, China
  • 4Department of Electrical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong 999077, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/COL201816.100605 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xiaojie Shen, Jiahao Huo, Xian Zhou, Kangping Zhong, Jinhui Yuan, Jiajing Tu, Keping Long, Changyuan Yu, Alan Pak Tao Lau, Chao Lu. Performance comparison among three different Stokes vector direct-detection receivers[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2018, 16(10): 100605 Copy Citation Text show less
    Cited By
    Article index updated: Feb. 24, 2023
    Citation counts are provided from Web of Science. The counts may vary by service, and are reliant on the availability of their data.
    The article is cited by 1 article(s) from Web of Science.
    Xiaojie Shen, Jiahao Huo, Xian Zhou, Kangping Zhong, Jinhui Yuan, Jiajing Tu, Keping Long, Changyuan Yu, Alan Pak Tao Lau, Chao Lu. Performance comparison among three different Stokes vector direct-detection receivers[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2018, 16(10): 100605
    Download Citation