• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 57, Issue 10, 101505 (2020)
Xieliu Yang1, Chenyu Yin1, Suping Fang2、*, and Shiming Liu1、**
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Mechanical Engineering,Shenyang Jianzhu University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110168, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710049, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP57.101505 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xieliu Yang, Chenyu Yin, Suping Fang, Shiming Liu. Three-Dimensional Measurement of Large-Scale Objects Using Photogrammetry Based on Total Station[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(10): 101505 Copy Citation Text show less
    Coordinate systems of measurement system. (a) Camera coordinate system and telescope coordinate system; (b) relationship between camera coordinate system, telescope coordinate system, and total station coordinate system
    Fig. 1. Coordinate systems of measurement system. (a) Camera coordinate system and telescope coordinate system; (b) relationship between camera coordinate system, telescope coordinate system, and total station coordinate system
    Schematic of thick lens imaging
    Fig. 2. Schematic of thick lens imaging
    Measurement of object image distance Lw
    Fig. 3. Measurement of object image distance Lw
    Calibration of single station parameters outside main distance
    Fig. 4. Calibration of single station parameters outside main distance
    Three-dimensional shape measurement process of proposed method
    Fig. 5. Three-dimensional shape measurement process of proposed method
    Control field
    Fig. 6. Control field
    Image of calibration board
    Fig. 7. Image of calibration board
    Reconstruction results. (a) Front; (b) left; (c) right
    Fig. 8. Reconstruction results. (a) Front; (b) left; (c) right
    Coding targets used for accuracy check on the measured object
    Fig. 9. Coding targets used for accuracy check on the measured object
    Length reconstruction error. (a) Absolute error in length; (b) relative error in length
    Fig. 10. Length reconstruction error. (a) Absolute error in length; (b) relative error in length
    Angle reconstruction error
    Fig. 11. Angle reconstruction error
    Parameter descriptionSign
    Perspective imaging intrinsic parameterauu0qv0s
    Lens distortion parameterk1k2
    Telescope's pose parameterrelative to the cameraθφωtctxtctytctz
    Pose parameter betweendifferent stationsβtsrslxtsrslytsrslz
    Table 1. Parameters to be determined in the combined measurement system
    ParameterResultau /pixelu0 /pixelqv0 /pixels /pixelk1k2
    1687819251.0128836-8.5×10-10-2.2×10-17
    ParameterResultθ /(°)φ /(°)ω /(°)tctx /mmtcty /mmtctz /mm
    188.5-87.9-99.1-2.5-257.9-34.1
    Table 2. Calibration results of single station parameters
    Inter-stationparametersβ/(°)tsrslx /mmtsrsly /mmtsrslz /mm
    S2S1-6.8251.84061.3-26.0
    S3S1-13.7695.27829.5-17.9
    S4S1-12.41-1508.1-3739.2402.6
    S5S1154.645326.65715.8420.9
    Table 3. Calibration results of parameters between stations
    Xieliu Yang, Chenyu Yin, Suping Fang, Shiming Liu. Three-Dimensional Measurement of Large-Scale Objects Using Photogrammetry Based on Total Station[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(10): 101505
    Download Citation