• Journal of Innovative Optical Health Sciences
  • Vol. 6, Issue 4, 1350030 (2013)
LINGLING XU1、2, ZHONG-CHAO WEI3, SHAOQUN ZENG1、2, and ZHEN-LI HUANG1、2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Britton Chance Center for Biomedical Photonics Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics-Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan 430074, P. R. China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Biomedical Photonics of Ministry of Education Department of Biomedical Engineering Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan 430074, P. R. China
  • 3Laboratory of Nanophotonic Functional Materials and Devices South China Normal University Guangzhou, 510006, P. R. China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1142/s1793545813500302 Cite this Article
    LINGLING XU, ZHONG-CHAO WEI, SHAOQUN ZENG, ZHEN-LI HUANG. QUANTIFYING THE SHORT LIFETIME WITH TCSPC-FLIM: FIRST MOMENT VERSUS FITTING METHODS[J]. Journal of Innovative Optical Health Sciences, 2013, 6(4): 1350030 Copy Citation Text show less

    Abstract

    Combing the time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) with fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) provides promising opportunities in revealing important information on the microenvironment of cells and tissues, but the applications are thus far mainly limited by the accuracy and precision of the TCSPC-FLIM technique. Here we present a comprehensive investigation on the performance of two data analysis methods, the first moment (M1) method and the conventional least squares (Fitting) method, in quantifying fluorescence lifetime. We found that the M1 method is more superior than the Fitting method when the lifetime is short (70 ~ 400 ps) or the signal intensity is weak (<103 photons).
    LINGLING XU, ZHONG-CHAO WEI, SHAOQUN ZENG, ZHEN-LI HUANG. QUANTIFYING THE SHORT LIFETIME WITH TCSPC-FLIM: FIRST MOMENT VERSUS FITTING METHODS[J]. Journal of Innovative Optical Health Sciences, 2013, 6(4): 1350030
    Download Citation