• Opto-Electronic Advances
  • Vol. 3, Issue 10, 190042-1 (2020)
Yuechen Jia*, Shixiang Wang, and Feng Chen
Author Affiliations
  • School of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.29026/oea.2020.190042 Cite this Article
    Yuechen Jia, Shixiang Wang, Feng Chen. Femtosecond laser direct writing of flexibly configured waveguide geometries in optical crystals: fabrication and application[J]. Opto-Electronic Advances, 2020, 3(10): 190042-1 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic illustration of a typical experimental setup for FsLDW operation.
    Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of a typical experimental setup for FsLDW operation.
    Schematic illustrations FsLDW of (a) single-line waveguides based on smooth Type-Ⅰ modification, (b) stress-induced double-line waveguides based on two parallel Type-Ⅱ laser tracks, and (c) depressed-cladding waveguides.
    Fig. 2. Schematic illustrations FsLDW of (a) single-line waveguides based on smooth Type-Ⅰ modification, (b) stress-induced double-line waveguides based on two parallel Type-Ⅱ laser tracks, and (c) depressed-cladding waveguides.
    Schematic illustration of nonlinear waveguide channels based on FsLDW single-/multi-line geometries.
    Fig. 3. Schematic illustration of nonlinear waveguide channels based on FsLDW single-/multi-line geometries.
    (a) Schematic illustration of Y-branch waveguide channels based on FsLDW double-line geometry39. (b) The microscopic photograph of the splitting region in a FsLDW Yb:YAG waveguide splitter39.(c) The cross-sectional microscopic photograph of a FsLDW Nd:YAG waveguide array43. (d) Reconstructed refractive index profile of the fabricated waveguide array43. Scale bars denote 30 µm. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a, b) ref.39 and (c, d) ref.43, Optical Society of America.
    Fig. 4. (a) Schematic illustration of Y-branch waveguide channels based on FsLDW double-line geometry39. (b) The microscopic photograph of the splitting region in a FsLDW Yb:YAG waveguide splitter39. (c) The cross-sectional microscopic photograph of a FsLDW Nd:YAG waveguide array43. (d) Reconstructed refractive index profile of the fabricated waveguide array43. Scale bars denote 30 µm. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a, b) ref.39 and (c, d) ref.43, Optical Society of America.
    (a) Schematic illustration of curved waveguide channels based on FsLDW depressed-cladding geometries34. (b) Schematic illustration of three-element 3D photonic-lattice-like cladding photonic structures for beam splitting and ring-shaped beam transformation31. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref.34, SPIE; (b) ref.31, Optical Society of America.
    Fig. 5. (a) Schematic illustration of curved waveguide channels based on FsLDW depressed-cladding geometries34. (b) Schematic illustration of three-element 3D photonic-lattice-like cladding photonic structures for beam splitting and ring-shaped beam transformation31. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref.34, SPIE; (b) ref.31, Optical Society of America.
    Schematic illustration of a MZI EO modulator with Y-branch waveguide channels based on FsLDW double-line geometries58. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.58, Optical Society of America.
    Fig. 6. Schematic illustration of a MZI EO modulator with Y-branch waveguide channels based on FsLDW double-line geometries58. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.58, Optical Society of America.
    (a) Lasing performance of FsLDW curved Yb:YAG double-line waveguides with different curvature radii R38. (b–e) Output modal profiles of FsLDW beam splitters and ring-shaped beam transformers49, 50. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref.38, Optical Society of America; (b, e) ref.49, Springer Nature; (c, d) ref.50, IEEE.
    Fig. 7. (a) Lasing performance of FsLDW curved Yb:YAG double-line waveguides with different curvature radii R38. (b–e) Output modal profiles of FsLDW beam splitters and ring-shaped beam transformers49, 50. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref.38, Optical Society of America; (b, e) ref.49, Springer Nature; (c, d) ref.50, IEEE.
    Modal profiles of SHG (1064→532 nm) and 1×4 beam splitting from photonic-lattice-like KTP cladding waveguides69. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.69, Springer Nature.
    Fig. 8. Modal profiles of SHG (1064→532 nm) and 1×4 beam splitting from photonic-lattice-like KTP cladding waveguides69. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.69, Springer Nature.
    CrystalWaveguideBranch angleLossER (dB)Vπ (V)λ
    LiNbO3 (x-cut)58Double-line1.2°1 dB/cm919632.8 nm
    LiNbO3 (x-cut)64Double-line1.5°4 dB1123532 nm
    LiNbO3 (x-cut)65Double-line0.5°30 dB11451550 nm
    Table 1. EO performance of reported FsLDW Y-branch waveguides in crystals.
    CrystalWaveguideOperation modeLossLasing thresholdSlope efficiency
    Yb:YAG38S-shape double-lineCW0.8 dB< 220 mW60%
    Yb:YAG39Y-branch double-lineCW3.1 dB271 mW40%
    Nd:YAG43Planar double-line arrayCW3.7 dB70.7 mW37%
    Nd:YAG49Photonic-lattice-like claddingCW & Q-switched0.7 dB~200 mW32%
    Nd:YAG50Photonic-lattice-like claddingCW0.5 dB~90 mW34%
    Nd:YAG67Y-branch claddingQ-switched1.1 dB/cm~450 mW-
    Nd:YAG68Y-branch claddingCW1.1 dB/cm90 mW22.4%
    Table 2. Lasing performance of reported FsLDW 3D waveguides in crystals.
    Yuechen Jia, Shixiang Wang, Feng Chen. Femtosecond laser direct writing of flexibly configured waveguide geometries in optical crystals: fabrication and application[J]. Opto-Electronic Advances, 2020, 3(10): 190042-1
    Download Citation