• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 8, Issue 4, 497 (2020)
Daquan Yang1, Aiqiang Wang1, Jin-Hui Chen2, Xiao-Chong Yu2, Chuwen Lan1, Yuefeng Ji1, and Yun-Feng Xiao2、3、4、5、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communications, School of Information and Communication Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory for Artificial Microstructure and Mesoscopic Physics, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • 3Frontiers Science Center for Nano-optoelectronics & Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter, Beijing 100871, China
  • 4Collaborative Innovation Center of Extreme Optics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
  • 5Beijing Academy of Quantum Information Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.380238 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Daquan Yang, Aiqiang Wang, Jin-Hui Chen, Xiao-Chong Yu, Chuwen Lan, Yuefeng Ji, Yun-Feng Xiao. Real-time monitoring of hydrogel phase transition in an ultrahigh Q microbubble resonator[J]. Photonics Research, 2020, 8(4): 497 Copy Citation Text show less
    (a) Schematic of the MBR platform for real-time monitoring of the dynamic reactions of hydrogel phase transition. The thermosensitive phase transition of PNIPA is optically controlled by the irradiation light power (∼1550 nm) from an SMF. (b) Monitoring the phase transition dynamics of the PNIPA solution by tracking the wavelength shift and linewidth broadening of a WGM. Insets, CCD images of the microbubble with the PNIPA solution at hydrophilic and hydrophobic state, respectively. (c) Transmission spectrum of MBR with the PNIPA solution at hydrophilic state. The enlarged view of the red square region is shown in (d). (e) Typical optical field distribution of a WGM in the MBR by finite-element method simulation.
    Fig. 1. (a) Schematic of the MBR platform for real-time monitoring of the dynamic reactions of hydrogel phase transition. The thermosensitive phase transition of PNIPA is optically controlled by the irradiation light power (1550  nm) from an SMF. (b) Monitoring the phase transition dynamics of the PNIPA solution by tracking the wavelength shift and linewidth broadening of a WGM. Insets, CCD images of the microbubble with the PNIPA solution at hydrophilic and hydrophobic state, respectively. (c) Transmission spectrum of MBR with the PNIPA solution at hydrophilic state. The enlarged view of the red square region is shown in (d). (e) Typical optical field distribution of a WGM in the MBR by finite-element method simulation.
    Transmission evolution of the microbubble with the PNIPA hydrogel when the control power of the irradiation light first (a) increases from 0 to 3.00 mW, and then (b) decreases from 3.00 to 0 mW; (c) CCD images of a cycle of phase-transition process of the PNIPA hydrogel. The microbubble changes from transparent hydrophilic state to opaque hydrophobic state due to the increased scattering. Inset, the scale bar is 125 μm.
    Fig. 2. Transmission evolution of the microbubble with the PNIPA hydrogel when the control power of the irradiation light first (a) increases from 0 to 3.00 mW, and then (b) decreases from 3.00 to 0 mW; (c) CCD images of a cycle of phase-transition process of the PNIPA hydrogel. The microbubble changes from transparent hydrophilic state to opaque hydrophobic state due to the increased scattering. Inset, the scale bar is 125 μm.
    (a) WGM wavelength shifts and (b) linewidth broadenings as a function of control power of the irradiation light from 0 to 3.00 mW, when the MBRs are filled with air (blue line with triangular marker), DI water (black line with square marker), and PNIPA hydrogel (red line with circular marker). Compared with the result of microbubble cavities filled with air and DI water, note that a hydrophilic to hydrophobic transition process of PNIPA can be clarified as four stages: (i) pure hydrophilic state (0–1.44 mW); (ii) subtransition state (1.44–2.04 mW); (iii) transition state (2.04–2.52 mW); (iv) pure hydrophobic state (>2.52 mW).
    Fig. 3. (a) WGM wavelength shifts and (b) linewidth broadenings as a function of control power of the irradiation light from 0 to 3.00 mW, when the MBRs are filled with air (blue line with triangular marker), DI water (black line with square marker), and PNIPA hydrogel (red line with circular marker). Compared with the result of microbubble cavities filled with air and DI water, note that a hydrophilic to hydrophobic transition process of PNIPA can be clarified as four stages: (i) pure hydrophilic state (0–1.44 mW); (ii) subtransition state (1.44–2.04 mW); (iii) transition state (2.04–2.52 mW); (iv) pure hydrophobic state (>2.52  mW).
    (a) Real-time WGM resonance wavelength shift and (b) linewidth broadening during the PNIPA hydrogel phase transition (a hydrophilic to hydrophobic transition) monitored by an MBR. The control power of the irradiation light is switched on at ∼12.5 s. During the whole phase-transition process, a small blueshift of 8.02 pm in wavelength is first observed within 13.22–15.62 s; then the overall redshift of the resonance wavelength is 39.23 pm, and the maximized linewidth broadening is 3.96 GHz.
    Fig. 4. (a) Real-time WGM resonance wavelength shift and (b) linewidth broadening during the PNIPA hydrogel phase transition (a hydrophilic to hydrophobic transition) monitored by an MBR. The control power of the irradiation light is switched on at 12.5  s. During the whole phase-transition process, a small blueshift of 8.02 pm in wavelength is first observed within 13.22–15.62 s; then the overall redshift of the resonance wavelength is 39.23 pm, and the maximized linewidth broadening is 3.96 GHz.
    Daquan Yang, Aiqiang Wang, Jin-Hui Chen, Xiao-Chong Yu, Chuwen Lan, Yuefeng Ji, Yun-Feng Xiao. Real-time monitoring of hydrogel phase transition in an ultrahigh Q microbubble resonator[J]. Photonics Research, 2020, 8(4): 497
    Download Citation