[1] S E Hosseini, M A Wahid. Hydrogen production from renewable and sustainable energy resources: Promising green energy carrier for clean development. Renew Sust Energ Rev, 57, 850(2016).

[2] A Vita, C Italiano, L Pino et al. Hydrogen-rich gas production by steam reforming of n-dodecane. Part II: Stability, regenerability and sulfur poisoning of low loading Rh-based catalyst. Appl Catal B, 218, 317(2017).

[3] T Hisatomi, K Domen. Reaction systems for solar hydrogen production via water splitting with particulate semiconductor photocatalysts. Nat Catal, 2, 387(2019).

[4] W Wang, M Xu, X Xu et al. Perovskite oxide-based electrodes for high-performance photoelectrochemical water splitting. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 58, 2(2019).

[5] G Chen, Z Hu, Y Zhu et al. A universal strategy to design superior water-splitting electrocatalysts based on fast in situ reconstruction of amorphous nanofilm precursors. Adv Mater, 30, 1804333(2018).

[6] G Zhang, G Liu, L Z Wang et al. Inorganic perovskite photocatalysts for solar energy utilization. Chem Soc Rev, 45, 5951(2016).

[7] X Sheng, T Xu, X J Feng. Rational design of photoelectrodes with rapid charge transport for photoelectrochemical applications. Adv Mater, 31, 1805132(2019).

[8] W J Chen, T T Wang, J W Xue et al. Cobalt-nickel layered double hydroxides modified on TiO₂ nanotube arrays for highly efficient and stable PEC water splitting. Small, 13, 1602420(2017).

[9] M Faraji, M Yousefi, S Yousefzadeh et al. Two-dimensional materials in semiconductor photoelectrocatalytic systems for water splitting. Energ Environ Sci, 12, 59(2019).

[10] X Huang, X Y Qi, F Boey et al. Graphene-based composites. Chem Soc Rev, 41, 666(2012).

[11] X Li, S W Liu, K Fan et al. MOF-based transparent passivation layer modified ZnO nanorod arrays for enhanced photo-electrochemical water splitting. Adv Energy Mater, 8, 1800101(2018).

[12] W J Ong, L L Tan, Y H Ng et al. Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C₃N₄)-based photocatalysts for artificial photosynthesis and environmental remediation: are we a step closer to achieving sustainability. Chem Rev, 116, 7159(2016).

[13] S C Wang, P Chen, Y Bai et al. New BiVO₄ dual photoanodes with enriched oxygen vacancies for efficient solar-driven water splitting. Adv Mater, 30, 1800486(2018).

[14] Y F Xu, H S Rao, B X Chen et al. Achieving highly efficient photoelectrochemical water oxidation with a TiCl₄ treated 3D antimony-doped SnO₂ macropore/branched alpha-Fe₂O₃ nanorod heterojunction photoanode. Adv Sci, 2, 1500049(2015).

[15] T F Yeh, C Y Teng, L C Chen et al. Graphene oxide-based nanomaterials for efficient photoenergy conversion. J Mater Chem A, 4, 2014(2016).

[16] Z M Zhang, C T Gao, Z M W u et al. Toward efficient photoelectrochemical water-splitting by using screw-like SnO₂ nanostructures as photoanode after being decorated with CdS quantum dots. Nano Energy, 19, 318(2016).

[17] Y E Zhou, L Y Zhang, L H Lin et al. Highly efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting from hierarchical WO₃/BiVO₄ nanoporous sphere arrays. Nano Lett, 17, 8012(2017).

[18] B A Pinaud, J D Benck, L C Seitz et al. Technical and economic feasibility of centralized facilities for solar hydrogen production via photocatalysis and photoelectrochemistry. Energ Environ Sci, 6, 1983(2013).

[19] P Tan, M L Liu, Z P Shao et al. Recent advances in perovskite oxides as electrode materials for nonaqueous lithium-oxygen batteries. Adv Energy Mater, 7, 1602674(2017).

[20] W Wang, M O Tade, Z P Shao. Nitrogen-doped simple and complex oxides for photocatalysis: A review. Prog Mater Sci, 92, 33(2018).

[21] M A Pena, J L Fierro. Chemical structures and performance of perovskite oxides. Chem Rev, 101, 1981(2001).

[22] J Suntivich, K J May, H A Gasteiger et al. A perovskite oxide optimized for oxygen evolution catalysis from molecular orbital principles. Science, 334, 1383(2011).

[23] J Hwang, R R Rao, L Giordano et al. Perovskites in catalysis and electrocatalysis. Science, 358, 751(2017).

[24] Z Y Cheng, J Lin. Layered organic-inorganic hybrid perovskites: structure, optical properties, film preparation, patterning and templating engineering. CrystEngComm, 12, 2646(2010).

[25] M A Green, A Ho-Baillie, H J Snaith. The emergence of perovskite solar cells. Nat Photonics, 8, 506(2014).

[26] V M Goldschmidt. Crystal structure and chemical correlation. Ber Dtsch Chem Ges, 60, 1263(1927).

[27] W Wang, M O Tade, Z P Shao. Research progress of perovskite materials in photocatalysis- and photovoltaics-related energy conversion and environmental treatment. Chem Soc Rev, 44, 5371(2015).

[28] C Li, K C K Soh, P Wu. Formability of ABO₃ perovskites. J Alloy Compd, 372, 40(2004).

[29] C H Li, X G Lu, W Z Ding et al. Formability of ABX₃ (X = F, Cl, Br, I) halide perovskites. Acta Crystallogr B, 64, 702(2008).

[30] C C Hu, Y L Lee, H S Teng. Efficient water splitting over Na_1–xK_xTaO₃ photocatalysts with cubic perovskite structure. J Mater Chem, 21, 3824(2011).

[31] P Li, S X Ouyang, G C Xi et al. The effects of crystal structure and electronic structure on photocatalytic H₂ evolution and CO₂ reduction over two phases of perovskite-structured NaNbO₃. J Phys Chem C, 116, 7621(2012).

[32] R E Cohen. Origin of ferroelectricity in perovskite oxides. Nature, 358, 136(1992).

[33] A Ohtomo, H Y Hwang. A high-mobility electron gas at the LaAlO₃/SrTiO₃ heterointerface. Nature, 427, 423(2004).

[34] N Reyren, S Thiel, A D Caviglia et al. Superconducting interfaces between insulating oxides. Science, 317, 1196(2007).

[35] S Jin, T H Tiefel, M McCormack et al. Thousandfold change in resistivity in magnetoresistive La–Ca–Mn–O films. Science, 264, 413(1994).

[36] K Huang, R S Tichy, J B Goodenough. Superior perovskite oxide-Ion conductor; strontium- and magnesium-doped LaGaO₃:I, phase relationships and electrical properties. J Am Ceram Soc, 81, 2565(1998).

[37] J Ibarra. Influence of composition on the structure and conductivity of the fast ionic conductors La_2/3−xLi_3xTiO₃ (0.03 ≤ x≤ 0.167). Solid State Ionics, 134, 219(2000).

[38] K S Chan, J Ma, S Jaenicke et al. Catalytic carbon-monoxide oxidation over strontium, cerium and copper-substituted lanthanum manganates and cobaltates. Appl Catal A, 107, 201(1994).

[39] S Royer, D Duprez, F Can et al. Perovskites as substitutes of noble metals for heterogeneous catalysis: dream or reality. Chem Rev, 114, 10292(2014).

[40] W J Yin, B Weng, J Ge et al. Oxide perovskites, double perovskites and derivatives for electrocatalysis, photocatalysis, and photovoltaics. Energ Environ Sci, 12, 442(2019).

[41] D Mignard, R C Batik, A S Bharadwaj et al. Revisiting strontium-doped lanthanum cuprate perovskite for the electrochemical reduction of CO₂. J CO2 Util, 5, 53(2014).

[42] J Suntivich, H A Gasteiger, N Yabuuchi et al. Design principles for oxygen-reduction activity on perovskite oxide catalysts for fuel cells and metal-air batteries. Nat Chem, 3, 546(2011).

[43] A Fujishima, K Honda. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature, 238, 37(1972).

[44] A Kudo, Y Miseki. Heterogeneous photocatalyst materials for water splitting. Chem Soc Rev, 38, 253(2009).

[45] S S Chen, T Takata, K Domen. Particulate photocatalysts for overall water splitting. Nat Rev Mater, 2, 17050(2017).

[46] J H Kim, D Hansora, P Sharma et al. Toward practical solar hydrogen production-an artificial photosynthetic leaf-to-farm challenge. Chem Soc Rev, 48, 1908(2019).

[47] M Q Yang, M M Gao, M H Hong et al. Visible-to-NIR photon harvesting: progressive engineering of catalysts for solar-powered environmental purification and fuel production. Adv Mater, 30, 1802894(2018).

[48] X B Li, C H Tung, L Z Wu. Semiconducting quantum dots for artificial photosynthesis. Nat Rev Chem, 2, 160(2018).

[49] K Maeda, K Domen. New non-oxide photocatalysts designed for overall water splitting under visible light. J Phys Chem C, 111, 7851(2007).

[50] R M N Yerga, M C A Galvan, F del Valle et al. Water splitting on semiconductor catalysts under visible-light irradiation. ChemSusChem, 2, 471(2009).

[51] A P Pushkarev, M N Bochkarev. Organic electroluminescent materials and devices emitting in UV and NIR regions. Russ Chem Rev, 85, 1338(2016).

[52] Z Kang, H N Si, S C Zhang et al. Interface engineering for modulation of charge carrier behavior in ZnO photoelectrochemical water splitting. Adv Funct Mater, 29, 1808032(2019).

[53] C R Jiang, S J A Moniz, A Q Wang et al. Photoelectrochemical devices for solar water splitting-materials and challenges. Chem Soc Rev, 46, 4645(2017).

[54] M Kitano, M Takeuchi, M Matsuoka et al. Photocatalytic water splitting using Pt-loaded visible light-responsive TiO₂ thin film photocatalysts. Catal Today, 120, 133(2007).

[55] N T Suen, S F Hung, Q Quan et al. Electrocatalysis for the oxygen evolution reaction: recent development and future perspectives. Chem Soc Rev, 46, 337(2017).

[56] P Kanhere, Z Chen. A review on visible light active perovskite-based photocatalysts. Molecules, 19, 19995(2014).

[57] M Moniruddin, B Ilyassov, X Zhao et al. Recent progress on perovskite materials in photovoltaic and water splitting applications. Mater Today Energy, 7, 246(2018).

[58] M A Khan, M A Nadeem, H Idrissn. Ferroelectric polarization effect on surface chemistry and photo-catalytic activity: A review. Surf Sci Rep, 71, 1(2016).

[59] R Konta, T Ishii, H Kato et al. Photocatalytic activities of noble metal ion doped SrTiO₃ under visible light irradiation. J Phys Chem B, 108, 8992(2004).

[60] T Ohno, T Tsubota, Y Nakamura et al. Preparation of S, C cation-codoped SrTiO₃ and its photocatalytic activity under visible light. Appl Catal A, 288, 74(2005).

[61] E Grabowska. Selected perovskite oxides: characterization, preparation and photocatalytic properties-A review. Appl Catal B, 186, 97(2016).

[62] M Kawasaki, K Takahashi, T Maeda et al. Atomic control of the SrTiO₃ crystal surface. Science, 266, 1540(1994).

[63] K Iwashina, A Kudo. Rh-doped SrTiO₃ photocatalyst electrode showing cathodic photocurrent for water splitting under visible-light irradiation. J Am Chem Soc, 133, 13272(2011).

[64] U S Shenoy, H Bantawal, D K Bhat. Band engineering of SrTiO₃: effect of synthetic technique and site occupancy of doped rhodium. J Phys Chem C, 122, 27567(2018).

[65] T Umebayashi, T Yamaki, H Itoh et al. Analysis of electronic structures of 3d transition metal-doped TiO₂ based on band calculations. J Phys Chem Solids, 63, 1909(2002).

[66] J P Zou, L Z Zhang, S L Luo et al. Preparation and photocatalytic activities of two new Zn-doped SrTiO₃ and BaTiO₃ photocatalysts for hydrogen production from water without cocatalysts loading. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 37, 17068(2012).

[67] M Machida, K Miyazaki, S Matsushima et al. Photocatalytic properties of layered perovskite tantalates, MLnTa₂O₇ (M = Cs, Rb, Na, and H; Ln = La, Pr, Nd, and Sm). J Mater Chem, 13, 1433(2003).

[68] J Yin, Z Zou, J Ye. Photophysical and photocatalytic properties of MIn_0.5Nb_0.5O₃ (M = Ca, Sr, and Ba). J Phys Chem B, 107, 61(2003).

[69] B B Dong, J Y Cui, T F Liu et al. Development of novel perovskite-like oxide photocatalyst LiCuTa₃O₉ with dual functions of water reduction and oxidation under visible light irradiation. Adv Energy Mater, 8, 1801660(2018).

[70] B Wang, P D Kanhere, Z Chen et al. Anion-doped NaTaO₃ for visible light photocatalysis. J Phys Chem C, 117, 22518(2013).

[71] F F Li, D R Liu, G M Gao et al. Improved visible-light photocatalytic activity of NaTaO₃ with perovskite-like structure via sulfur anion doping. Appl Catal B, 166/167, 104(2015).

[72] H Yu, J J Wang, S C Yan et al. Elements doping to expand the light response of SrTiO₃. J Photoch Photobio A, 275, 65(2014).

[73] M Humayun, L Xu, L Zhou et al. Exceptional co-catalyst free photocatalytic activities of B and Fe co-doped SrTiO₃ for CO₂ conversion and H₂ evolution. Nano Res, 11, 6391(2018).

[74] C Pan, T Takata, K Kumamoto et al. Band engineering of perovskite-type transition metal oxynitrides for photocatalytic overall water splitting. J Mater Chem A, 4, 4544(2016).

[75] J Shi, J Ye, Z Zhou et al. Hydrothermal synthesis of Na_0.5La_0.5TiO₃-LaCrO₃ solid-solution single-crystal nanocubes for visible-light-driven photocatalytic H₂ evolution. Chem-Eur J, 17, 7858(2011).

[76] D Wang, T Kako, J Ye. Efficient photocatalytic decomposition of acetaldehyde over a solid-solution perovskite (Ag_0.75Sr_0.25)(Nb_0.75Ti_0.25)O₃ under visible-light irradiation. J Am Chem Soc, 130, 2724(2008).

[77] W Luo, Z Li, X Jiang et al. Correlation between the band positions of (SrTiO₃)_1−x·(LaTiO₂N)_x solid solutions and photocatalytic properties under visible light irradiation. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 10, 6717(2008).

[78] S Cho, J W Jang, W Zhang et al. Single-crystalline thin films for studying intrinsic properties of BiFeO₃-SrTiO₃ solid solution photoelectrodes in solar energy conversion. Chem Mater, 27, 6635(2015).

[79] L Lu, M Lv, D Wang et al. Efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production over solid solutions Sr_1–xBi_xTi_1–xFexO₃ (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.5). Appl Catal B, 200, 412(2017).

[80] G Zhang, S Sun, W Jiang et al. A novel perovskite SrTiO₃-Ba₂FeNbO₆ solid solution for visible light photocatalytic hydrogen production. Adv Energy Mater, 7, 1600932(2017).

[81] W Li, K Jiang, Z Li et al. Origin of improved photoelectrochemical water splitting in mixed perovskite oxides. Adv Mater, 8, 1801972(2018).

[82] D J Martin, N Umezawa, X Chen et al. Facet engineered Ag₃PO₄ for efficient water photooxidation. Energ Environ Sci, 6, 3380(2013).

[83] D J Martin, K Qiu, S A Shevlin et al. Highly efficient photocatalytic H₂ evolution from water using visible light and structure-controlled graphitic carbon nitride. Angew Chem Int Ed, 53, 9240(2014).

[84] Y Ham, T Hisatomi, Y Goto et al. Flux-mediated doping of SrTiO₃ photocatalysts for efficient overall water splitting. J Mater Chem A, 4, 3027(2016).

[85] L Mu, Y Zhao, A Li et al. Enhancing charge separation on high symmetry SrTiO₃ exposed with anisotropic facets for photocatalytic water splitting. Energ Environ Sci, 9, 2463(2016).

[86] D L Zhong, W W Liu, P F Tan et al. Insights into the synergy effect of anisotropic {001} and {230} facets of BaTiO₃ nanocubes sensitized with CdSe quantum dots for photocatalytic water reduction. Appl Catal B, 227, 1(2018).

[87] M Qiao, J Liu, Y Wang et al. PdSeO₃ monolayer: promising inorganic 2D photocatalyst for direct overall water splitting without using sacrificial reagents and cocatalysts. J Am Chem Soc, 140, 12256(2018).

[88] S Chandrasekaran, E J Kim, J S Chung et al. Structurally tuned lead magnesium titanate perovskite as a photoelectrode material for enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting. Chem Eng J, 309, 682(2017).

[89] K M Parida, K H Reddy, S Martha et al. Fabrication of nanocrystalline LaFeO₃: An efficient sol-gel auto-combustion assisted visible light responsive photocatalyst for water decomposition. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 35, 12161(2010).

[90] S N Tijare, M V Joshi, P S Padole et al. Photocatalytic hydrogen generation through water splitting on nano-crystalline LaFeO₃ perovskite. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 37, 10451(2012).

[91] C W Lee, D W Kim, I S Cho et al. Simple synthesis and characterization of SrSnO₃ nanoparticles with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 37, 10557(2012).

[92] M Klusackova, R Nebel, K M Macounova et al. Size control of the photo-electrochemical water splitting activity of SrTiO₃ nano-cubes. Electrochimica Acta, 297, 215(2019).

[93] A Kudo, A Tanaka, K Domen et al. The effects of the calcination temperature of SrTiO₃ powder on photocatalytic activities. J Catal, 111, 296(1988).

[94] I Grinberg, D V West, M Torres et al. Perovskite oxides for visible-light-absorbing ferroelectric and photovoltaic materials. Nature, 503, 509(2013).

[95] H T Yi, T Choi, S G Choi et al. Mechanism of the switchable photovoltaic effect in ferroelectric BiFeO₃. Adv Mater, 23, 3403(2011).

[96] A Bhatnagar, A R Chaudhuri, Y H Kim et al. Role of domain walls in the abnormal photovoltaic effect in BiFeO₃. Nat Commun, 4, 2835(2013).

[97] D Cao, J Xu, L Fang et al. Interface effect on the photocurrent: A comparative study on Pt sandwiched (Bi_3.7Nd_0.3)Ti₃O₁₂ and Pb(Zr_0.2Ti_0.8)O₃ films. Appl Phys Lett, 96, 192101(2010).

[98] C Wang, D Cao, F Zheng et al. Photocathodic behavior of ferroelectric Pb(Zr,Ti)O₃ films decorated with silver nanoparticles. Chem Commun, 49, 3769(2013).

[99] D Cao, Z Wang et al. Switchable charge-transfer in the photoelectrochemical energy-conversion process of ferroelectric BiFeO₃ photoelectrodes. Angew Chem Int Ed, 53, 11027(2014).

[100] J Song, T L Kim, J Lee et al. Domain-engineered BiFeO₃ thin-film photoanodes for highly enhanced ferroelectric solar water splitting. Nano Res, 11, 642(2018).

[101] Z Wang, D Cao, L Wen et al. Manipulation of charge transfer and transport in plasmonic-ferroelectric hybrids for photoelectrochemical applications. Nat Commun, 7, 10348(2016).

[102] J Shi, P Zhao, X Wang. Piezoelectric-polarization-enhanced photovoltaic performance in depleted-heterojunction quantum-dot solar cells. Adv Mater, 25, 916(2013).

[103] X Huang, K Wang, Y Wang et al. Enhanced charge carrier separation to improve hydrogen production efficiency by ferroelectric spontaneous polarization electric field. Appl Catal B, 227, 322(2018).

[104] W Yang, Y Yu, M B Starr et al. Ferroelectric polarization-enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting in TiO₂-BaTiO₃ core-shell nanowire photoanodes. Nano Lett, 15, 7574(2015).

[105] W Li, F Wang, M Li et al. Polarization-dependent epitaxial growth and photocatalytic performance of ferroelectric oxide heterostructures. Nano Energy, 45, 304(2018).

[106] A A Iyer, E Ertekin. Asymmetric response of ferroelectric/metal oxide heterojunctions for catalysis arising from interfacial chemistry. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 19, 5870(2017).

[107] J H Lee, A Selloni. TiO₂/ferroelectric heterostructures as dynamic polarization-promoted catalysts for photochemical and electrochemical oxidation of water. Phys Rev Lett, 112, 196102(2014).

[108] J Xie, C Guo, P Yang et al. Bi-functional ferroelectric BiFeO₃ passivated BiVO₄ photoanode for efficient and stable solar water oxidation. Nano Energy, 31, 28(2017).

[109] J Low, J Yu, M Jaroniec et al. Heterojunction photocatalysts. Adv Mater, 29, 1601694(2017).

[110] H Li, Y Zhou, W Tu et al. State-of-the-art progress in diverse heterostructured photocatalysts toward promoting photocatalytic performance. Adv Funct Mater, 25, 998(2015).

[111] A Nashim, K Parida. n-La₂Ti₂O₇/p-LaCrO₃: a novel heterojunction based composite photocatalyst with enhanced photoactivity towards hydrogen production. J Mater Chem A, 2, 18405(2014).

[112] X Xu, G Liu, C Randorn et al. g-C₃N₄ coated SrTiO₃ as an efficient photocatalyst for H₂ production in aqueous solution under visible light irradiation. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 36, 13501(2011).

[113] H W Kang, S N Lim, D Song et al. Organic-inorganic composite of g-C₃N₄-SrTiO₃:Rh photocatalyst for improved H₂ evolution under visible light irradiation. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 37, 11602(2012).

[114] F Opoku, K K Govender, C G C E van Sittert et al. Tuning the electronic structures, work functions, optical properties and stability of bifunctional hybrid graphene oxide/V-doped NaNbO₃ type-II heterostructures: A promising photocatalyst for H₂ production. Carbon, 136, 187(2018).

[115] Q Jia, A Iwase, A Kudo. BiVO₄-Ru/SrTiO₃:Rh composite Z-scheme photocatalyst for solar water splitting. Chem Sci, 5, 1513(2014).

[116] C Dong, S Lu, S Yao et al. Colloidal synthesis of ultrathin monoclinic BiVO₄ nanosheets for Z-scheme overall water splitting under visible light. ACS Catal, 8, 8649(2018).

[117] Z Ma, Y Li, Y Lv et al. Synergistic effect of doping and compositing on photocatalytic efficiency: a case study of La₂Ti₂O₇. ACS Appl Mater Inter, 10, 39327(2018).

[118] Y Wei, J Wang, R Yu et al. Constructing SrTiO₃-TiO₂ heterogeneous hollow multi-shelled structures for enhanced solar water splitting. Angew Chem Int Ed, 131, 1436(2019).

[119] Y Chang, K Yu, C Zhang et al. Ternary CdS/Au/3DOM-SrTiO₃ composites with synergistic enhancement for hydrogen production from visible-light photocatalytic water splitting. Appl Catal B, 215, 74(2017).

[120] M Valenti, M P Jonsson, G Biskos et al. Plasmonic nanoparticle-semiconductor composites for efficient solar water splitting. J Mater Chem A, 4, 17891(2016).

[121] P Zhang, T Wang, J Gong. Mechanistic understanding of the plasmonic enhancement for solar water splitting. Adv Mater, 27, 5328(2015).

[122] D Xu, S Yang, Y Jin et al. Ag-decorated ATaO₃ (A = K, Na) nanocube plasmonic photocatalysts with enhanced photocatalytic water-splitting properties. Langmuir, 31, 9694(2015).

[123] J Liu, Y Sun, Z Li et al. Photocatalytic hydrogen production from water/methanol solutions over highly ordered Ag-SrTiO₃ nanotube arrays. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 36, 5811(2011).

[124] D Lu, S Ouyang, H Xu et al. Designing Au surface-modified nanoporous-single-crystalline SrTiO₃ to optimize diffusion of surface plasmon resonance-induce photoelectron toward enhanced visible-light photoactivity. ACS Appl Mater Inter, 8, 9506(2016).

[125] B T Zhang, J Liu, S Yue et al. Hot electron injection: an efficacious approach to charge LaCoO₃ for improving the water splitting efficiency. Appl Catal B, 219, 432(2017).

[126] Y B Huang, J Liu, D W Cao et al. Separation of hot electrons and holes in Au/LaFeO₃ to boost the photocatalytic activities both for water reduction and oxidation. Int J Hydrogen Energ, 44, 13242(2019).

[127] X Cai, M Zhu, O A Elbanna et al. Au nanorod photosensitized La₂Ti₂O₇ nanosteps: successive surface heterojunctions boosting visible to near-infrared photocatalytic H₂ evolution. ACS Catal, 8, 122(2018).

[128] L Shi, W Zhou, Z Li et al. Periodically ordered nanoporous perovskite photoelectrode for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. ACS Nano, 12, 6335(2018).

[129] Y Zhong, K Ueno, Y Mori et al. Plasmon-assisted water splitting using two sides of the same SrTiO₃ single-crystal substrate: conversion of visible light to chemical energy. Angew Chem Int Ed, 53, 10350(2014).

[130] Q Liu, Y Zhou, L You et al. Enhanced ferroelectric photoelectrochemical properties of polycrystalline BiFeO₃ film by decorating with Ag nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett, 108, 022902(2016).

[131] Y L Huang, W S Chang, C N Van et al. Tunable photoelectrochemical performance of Au/BiFeO₃ heterostructure. Nanoscale, 8, 15795(2016).

[132] M Zhu, X Cai, M Fujitsuka et al. Au/La₂Ti₂O₇ nanostructures sensitized with black phosphorus for plasmon-enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production in visible and near-infrared light. Angew Chem Int Ed, 56, 2064(2017).

[133] J Liu, Y Liu, N Liu et al. Metal-free efficient photocatalyst for stable visible water splitting via a two-electron pathway. Science, 347, 970(2015).