[1] A. Ourjoumtsev et al. Generation of optical ‘Schrödinger cats’ from photon number states. Nature, 448, 784-786(2007).

[2] E. Bimbard et al. Quantum-optical state engineering up to the two-photon level. Nat. Photonics, 4, 243-247(2010).

[3] A. E. Ulanov et al. Loss-tolerant state engineering for quantum-enhanced metrology via the reverse Hong–Ou–Mandel effect. Nat. Commun., 7, 11925(2016).

[4] B. L. Higgins et al. Entanglement-free Heisenberg-limited phase estimation. Nature, 450, 393-396(2007).

[5] E. Knill, R. Laflamme, G. J. Milburn. A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics. Nature, 409, 46-52(2001).

[6] K. J. Resch et al. Time-reversal and super-resolving phase measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett., 98, 223601(2007).

[7] P. Kok et al. Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits. Rev. Mod. Phys., 79, 135-174(2007).

[8] A. Zhang et al. Experimental test of contextuality in quantum and classical systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 122, 080401(2019).

[9] T. Li et al. Experimental contextuality in classical light. Sci. Rep., 7, 44467(2017).

[10] D. Frustaglia et al. Classical physics and the bounds of quantum correlations. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 250404(2016).

[11] M. Markiewicz et al. From contextuality of a single photon to realism of an electromagnetic wave. NPJ Quantum Inf., 5, 5(2019).

[12] S. Berg-Johansen et al. Classically entangled optical beams for high-speed kinematic sensing. Optica, 2, 864-868(2015).

[13] D. Guzman-Silva et al. Demonstration of local teleportation using classical entanglement. Laser Photonics Rev., 10, 317-321(2016).

[14] B. Ndagano et al. Characterizing quantum channels with non-separable states of classical light. Nat. Phys., 13, 397-402(2017).

[15] A. Z. Goldberg et al. Extremal quantum states. AVS Quantum Sci., 2, 044701(2020).

[16] S. M. Barnett et al. Retrodiction for quantum optical communications. Phys. Rev. A, 62, 022313(2000).

[17] D. T. Pegg, S. M. Barnett, J. Jeffers. Quantum retrodiction in open systems. Phys. Rev. A, 66, 022106(2002).

[18] T. Amri, J. Laurat, C. Fabre. Characterizing quantum properties of a measurement apparatus: insights from the retrodictive approach. Phys. Rev. Lett., 106, 020502(2011).

[19] T. Theurer et al. Quantifying operations with an application to coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett., 122, 190405(2019).

[20] V. Cimini et al. Measuring coherence of quantum measurements. Phys. Rev. Res., 1, 033020(2019).

[21] F. Bischof, H. Kampermann, D. Bruß. Resource theory of coherence based on positive-operator-valued measures. Phys. Rev. Lett., 123, 110402(2019).

[22] T. Guff et al. A resource theory of quantum measurements. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 54, 225301(2021).

[23] H. Xu et al. Experimental quantification of coherence of a tunable quantum detector. Phys. Rev. Lett., 125, 060404(2020).

[24] J. Lundeen et al. Tomography of quantum detectors. Nat. Phys., 5, 27-30(2009).

[25] G. M. D’Ariano, L. Maccone, P. L. Presti. Quantum calibration of measurement instrumentation. Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, 250407(2004).

[26] A. Luis, L. L. Sánchez-Soto. Complete characterization of arbitrary quantum measurement processes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 83, 3573-3576(1999).

[27] J. Fiurášek. Maximum-likelihood estimation of quantum measurement. Phys. Rev. A, 64, 024102(2001).

[28] V. d’Auria et al. Quantum decoherence of single-photon counters. Phys. Rev. Lett., 107, 050504(2011).

[29] A. Feito et al. Measuring measurement: theory and practice. New J. Phys., 11, 093038(2009).

[30] H. B. Coldenstrodt-Ronge et al. A proposed testbed for detector tomography. J. Mod. Opt., 56, 432-441(2009).

[31] G. Brida et al. Quantum characterization of superconducting photon counters. New J. Phys., 14, 085001(2012).

[32] M. K. Akhlaghi, A. H. Majedi, J. S. Lundeen. Nonlinearity in single photon detection: modeling and quantum tomography. Opt. Express, 19, 21305-21312(2011).

[33] A. Worsley et al. Absolute efficiency estimation of photon-number-resolving detectors using twin beams. Opt. Express, 17, 4397-4412(2009).

[34] D. Mayers, A. Yao. Quantum cryptography with imperfect apparatus. Proc. 39th Annu. Symp. Found. Comput. Sci., 503-509(1998).

[35] E. S. Gómez et al. Device-independent certification of a nonprojective qubit measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett., 117, 260401(2016).

[36] W.-H. Zhang et al. Experimentally robust self-testing for bipartite and tripartite entangled states. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121, 240402(2018).

[37] A. Tavakoli et al. Self-testing quantum states and measurements in the prepare-and-measure scenario. Phys. Rev. A, 98, 062307(2018).

[38] J. Řeháček, D. Mogilevtsev, Z. Hradil. Operational tomography: fitting of data patterns. Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, 010402(2010).

[39] D. Mogilevtsev et al. Data pattern tomography: reconstruction with an unknown apparatus. New J. Phys., 15, 025038(2013).

[40] L. Zhang et al. Mapping coherence in measurement via full quantum tomography of a hybrid optical detector. Nat. Photonics, 6, 364-368(2012).

[41] J. Renema et al. Experimental test of theories of the detection mechanism in a nanowire superconducting single photon detector. Phys. Rev. Lett., 112, 117604(2014).

[42] J. S. Lundeen et al. Direct measurement of the quantum wavefunction. Nature, 474, 188-191(2011).

[43] M. Malik et al. Direct measurement of a 27-dimensional orbital-angular-momentum state vector. Nat. Commun., 5, 3115(2014).

[44] G. A. Howland, D. J. Lum, J. C. Howell. Compressive wavefront sensing with weak values. Opt. Express, 22, 18870-18880(2014).

[45] M. Mirhosseini et al. Compressive direct measurement of the quantum wave function. Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, 090402(2014).

[46] S. H. Knarr et al. Compressive direct imaging of a billion-dimensional optical phase space. Phys. Rev. A, 98, 023854(2018).

[47] Z. Shi et al. Scan-free direct measurement of an extremely high-dimensional photonic state. Optica, 2, 388-392(2015).

[48] K. Ogawa et al. A framework for measuring weak values without weak interactions and its diagrammatic representation. New J. Phys., 21, 043013(2019).

[49] K. Ogawa et al. Direct measurement of ultrafast temporal wavefunctions. Opt. Express, 29, 19403-19416(2021).

[50] Y. Zhou et al. Direct tomography of high-dimensional density matrices for general quantum states of photons. Phys. Rev. Lett., 127, 040402(2021).

[51] M. Yang et al. Zonal reconstruction of photonic wavefunction via momentum weak measurement. Laser Photonics Rev., 14, 1900251(2020).

[52] J. Z. Salvail et al. Full characterization of polarization states of light via direct measurement. Nat. Photonics, 7, 316-321(2013).

[53] C. Bamber, J. S. Lundeen. Observing Dirac’s classical phase space analog to the quantum state. Phys. Rev. Lett., 112, 070405(2014).

[54] J. S. Lundeen, C. Bamber. Procedure for direct measurement of general quantum states using weak measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett., 108, 070402(2012).

[55] G. S. Thekkadath et al. Direct measurement of the density matrix of a quantum system. Phys. Rev. Lett., 117, 120401(2016).

[56] S. Wu. State tomography via weak measurements. Sci. Rep., 3, 1193(2013).

[57] C. Ren, Y. Wang, J. Du. Efficient direct measurement of arbitrary quantum systems via weak measurement. Phys. Rev. Appl., 12, 014045(2019).

[58] W.-W. Pan et al. Direct measurement of a nonlocal entangled quantum state. Phys. Rev. Lett., 123, 150402(2019).

[59] Y. Kim et al. Direct quantum process tomography via measuring sequential weak values of incompatible observables. Nat. Commun., 9, 192(2018).

[60] L. Xu et al. Direct characterization of quantum measurements using weak values. Phys. Rev. Lett., 127, 180401(2021).

[61] P. Zou, Z.-M. Zhang, W. Song. Direct measurement of general quantum states using strong measurement. Phys. Rev. A, 91, 052109(2015).

[62] G. Vallone, D. Dequal. Strong measurements give a better direct measurement of the quantum wave function. Phys. Rev Lett., 116, 040502(2016).

[63] Y.-X. Zhang, S. Wu, Z.-B. Chen. Coupling-deformed pointer observables and weak values. Phys. Rev. A, 93, 032128(2016).

[64] X. Zhu, Y.-X. Zhang, S. Wu. Direct state reconstruction with coupling-deformed pointer observables. Phys. Rev. A, 93, 062304(2016).

[65] T. Denkmayr et al. Experimental demonstration of direct path state characterization by strongly measuring weak values in a matter-wave interferometer. Phys. Rev. Lett, 118, 010402(2017).

[66] L. Calderaro et al. Direct reconstruction of the quantum density matrix by strong measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121, 230501(2018).

[67] X. Zhu et al. Hybrid direct state tomography by weak value(2019).

[68] C.-R. Zhang et al. Direct measurement of the two-dimensional spatial quantum wave function via strong measurements. Phys. Rev. A, 101, 012119(2020).

[69] M.-C. Chen et al. Directly measuring a multiparticle quantum wave function via quantum teleportation. Phys. Rev. Lett., 127, 030402(2021).

[70] J. A. Gross et al. Novelty, efficacy, and significance of weak measurements for quantum tomography. Phys. Rev. A, 92, 062133(2015).

[71] E. Haapasalo, P. Lahti, J. Schultz. Weak versus approximate values in quantum state determination. Phys. Rev. A, 84, 052107(2011).

[72] Z. Bian et al. Realization of single-qubit positive-operator-valued measurement via a one-dimensional photonic quantum walk. Phys. Rev. Lett., 114, 203602(2015).

[73] D. Brivio et al. Experimental estimation of one-parameter qubit gates in the presence of phase diffusion. Phys. Rev. A, 81, 012305(2010).

[74] R. Horodecki et al. Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys., 81, 865-942(2009).