[1] K Maeda, K Teramura, D Lu et al. Photocatalyst releasing hydrogen from water. Nature, 440, 295(2006).

[2] Y C Zhang, N Afzal, L Pan et al. Structure-activity relationship of defective metal-based photocatalysts for water splitting: Experimental and theoretical perspectives. Adv Sci, 6, 1900053(2019).

[3] S L Foster, S I P Bakovic, R D Duda et al. Catalysts for nitrogen reduction to ammonia. Nat Catal, 1, 490(2018).

[4] Q L Xu, L Y Zhang, B Cheng et al. S-scheme heterojunction photocatalyst. Chem, 6, 1543(2020).

[5] Y G Chao, P Zhou, N Li et al. Ultrathin visible-light-driven Mo incorporating In₂O₃-ZnIn₂Se₄ Z-scheme nanosheet photocatalysts. Adv Mater, 31, 1807226(2019).

[6] Y Gu, A P Wu, Y Q Jiao et al. Two-dimensional porous molybdenum phosphide/nitride heterojunction nanosheets for pH-universal hydrogen evolution reaction. Angew Chem Int Ed, 60, 6673(2021).

[7] S Khan, M Je, N N T Ton et al. C-doped ZnS-ZnO/Rh nanosheets as multijunctioned photocatalysts for effective H₂ generation from pure water under solar simulating light. Appl Catal B, 297, 120473(2021).

[8] L Ran, J G Hou, S Y Cao et al. Defect engineering of photocatalysts for solar energy conversion. Sol RRL, 4, 1900487(2020).

[9] M Liu, Y Chen, J Su et al. Photocatalytic hydrogen production using twinned nanocrystals and an unanchored NiS_x co-catalyst. Nat Energy, 1, 16151(2016).

[10] M Barawi, L Collado, M Gomez-Mendoza et al. Conjugated porous polymers: Ground-breaking materials for solar energy conversion. Adv Energy Mater, 11, 2101530(2021).

[11] J G Wang, Y J Chen, W Zhou et al. Cubic quantum dot/hexagonal microsphere ZnIn₂S₄ heterophase junctions for exceptional visible-light-driven photocatalytic H₂ evolution. J Mater Chem A, 5, 8451(2017).

[12] H B Yu, J H Huang, L B Jiang et al. Enhanced photocatalytic tetracycline degradation using N-CQDs/OV-BiOBr composites: Unraveling the complementary effects between N-CQDs and oxygen vacancy. Chem Eng J, 402, 126187(2020).

[13] D D Gao, X H Wu, P Wang et al. Selenium-enriched amorphous NiSe_1+x nanoclusters as a highly efficient cocatalyst for photocatalytic H₂ evolution. Chem Eng J, 408, 127230(2021).

[14] S Bai, J Jiang, Q Zhang et al. Steering charge kinetics in photocatalysis: Intersection of materials syntheses, characterization techniques and theoretical simulations. Chem Soc Rev, 44, 2893(2015).

[15] F Y Chen, Z Y Wu, Z Adler et al. Stability challenges of electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction: From mechanistic understanding to reactor design. Joule, 5, 1704(2021).

[16] S R Zhang, L Nguyen, Y Zhu et al. In-situ studies of nanocatalysis. Acc Chem Res, 46, 1731(2013).

[17] F Zaera. In-situ and operando spectroscopies for the characterization of catalysts and of mechanisms of catalytic reactions. J Catal, 404, 900(2021).

[18] der Wal L I van, S J Turner, J Zečević. Developments and advances in in situ transmission electron microscopy for catalysis research. Catal Sci Technol, 11, 3634(2021).

[19] A Knop-Gericke, E Kleimenov, M Hävecker et al. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy for investigation of heterogeneous catalytic processes. Adv Catal, 52, 213(2009).

[20] M H M Ahmed, R H Temperton, J N O'Shea. An in situ exploration of subsurface defect migration to a liquid water-exposed rutile TiO₂(110) surface by XPS. Surf Interface Anal, 53, 1013(2021).

[21] P Zhang, Y K Li, Y S Zhang et al. Photogenerated electron transfer process in heterojunctions: in situ irradiation XPS. Small Methods, 4, 2000214(2020).

[22] S Bordiga, E Groppo, G Agostini et al. Reactivity of surface species in heterogeneous catalysts probed by in situ X-ray absorption techniques. Chem Rev, 113, 1736(2013).

[23] F Zaera. New advances in the use of infrared absorption spectroscopy for the characterization of heterogeneous catalytic reactions. Chem Soc Rev, 43, 7624(2014).

[24] I E Wachs, C A Roberts. Monitoring surface metal oxide catalytic active sites with Raman spectroscopy. Chem Soc Rev, 39, 5002(2010).

[25] H Kim, K M Kosuda, R P van Duyne et al. Resonance Raman and surface- and tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy methods to study solid catalysts and heterogeneous catalytic reactions. Chem Soc Rev, 39, 4820(2010).

[26] M G Bakker, B Fowler, M K Bowman et al. Experimental methods in chemical engineering: Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy-EPR/ESR. Can J Chem Eng, 98, 1668(2020).

[27] J B Wu, H Shan, W L Chen et al. In situ environmental TEM in imaging gas and liquid phase chemical reactions for materials research. Adv Mater, 28, 9686(2016).

[28] W Grogger, F Hofer, G Kothleitner et al. An introduction to high-resolution EELS in transmission electron microscopy. Top Catal, 50, 200(2008).

[29] F Besenbacher, J V Lauritsen, S Wendt. STM studies of model catalysts. Nano Today, 2, 30(2007).

[30] A Preet, T E Lin. A review: Scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) for visualizing the real-time local catalytic activity. Catalysts, 11, 594(2021).

[31] G X Zhuang, Y W Chen, Z Y Zhuang et al. Oxygen vacancies in metal oxides: Recent progress towards advanced catalyst design. Sci China Mater, 63, 2089(2020).

[32] H F Feng, Z F Xu, L Ren et al. Activating titania for efficient electrocatalysis by vacancy engineering. ACS Catal, 8, 4288(2018).

[33] T T Hou, Y Xiao, P X Cui et al. Operando oxygen vacancies for enhanced activity and stability toward nitrogen photofixation. Adv Energy Mater, 9, 1902319(2019).

[34] N Kolmakova, A Kolmakov. Scanning electron microscopy for in situ monitoring of semiconductor−liquid interfacial processes: Electron assisted reduction of Ag ions from aqueous solution on the surface of TiO₂ rutile nanowire. J Phys Chem C, 114, 17233(2010).

[35] G Möbus, Z Saghi, D C Sayle et al. Dynamics of polar surfaces on ceria nanoparticles observed in situ with single-atom resolution. Adv Funct Mater, 21, 1971(2011).

[36] M Bugnet, S H Overbury, Z L Wu et al. Direct visualization and control of atomic mobility at {100} surfaces of ceria in the environmental transmission electron microscope. Nano Lett, 17, 7652(2017).

[37] F Cavalca, A B Laursen, B E Kardynal et al. In situ transmission electron microscopy of light-induced photocatalytic reactions. Nanotechnology, 23, 075705(2012).

[38] L X Zhang, B K Miller, P A Crozier. Atomic level in situ observation of surface amorphization in anatase nanocrystals during light irradiation in water vapor. Nano Lett, 13, 679(2013).

[39] Y Lu, W J Yin, K L Peng et al. Self-hydrogenated shell promoting photocatalytic H₂ evolution on anatase TiO₂. Nat Commun, 9, 2752(2018).

[40] S H Yu, Y H Jiang, Y Sun et al. Real time imaging of photocatalytic active site formation during H₂ evolution by in situ TEM. Appl Catal B, 284, 119743(2021).

[41] M Rycenga, C M Cobley, J Zeng et al. Controlling the synthesis and assembly of silver nanostructures for plasmonic applications. Chem Rev, 111, 3669(2011).

[42] G R Bamwenda, S Tsubota, T Nakamura et al. Photoassisted hydrogen production from a water-ethanol solution: A comparison of activities of Au–TiO₂ and Pt–TiO₂. J Photochem Photobiol A, 89, 177(1995).

[43] J B Priebe, M Karnahl, H Junge et al. Water reduction with visible light: Synergy between optical transitions and electron transfer in Au-TiO₂ catalysts visualized by in situ EPR spectroscopy. Angew Chem Int Ed, 52, 11420(2013).

[44] K S Yang, Y R Lu, Y Y Hsu et al. Plasmon-induced visible-light photocatalytic activity of Au nanoparticle-decorated hollow mesoporous TiO₂: A view by X-ray spectroscopy. J Phys Chem C, 122, 6955(2018).

[45] O S Ekande, M Kumar. Review on polyaniline as reductive photocatalyst for the construction of the visible light active heterojunction for the generation of reactive oxygen species. J Environ Chem Eng, 9, 105725(2021).

[46] Y Yuan, R T Guo, L F Hong et al. A review of metal oxide-based Z-scheme heterojunction photocatalysts: Actualities and developments. Mater Today Energy, 21, 100829(2021).

[47] T M Di, Q L Xu, W Ho et al. Review on metal sulphide-based Z-scheme photocatalysts. ChemCatChem, 11, 1394(2019).

[48] L M Sai, X Y Kong. Type II hybrid structures of TiO₂ nanorods conjugated with CdS quantum dots: Assembly and optical properties. Appl Phys A, 114, 605(2014).

[49] Y Y Zhu, Y F Liu, Y H Lv et al. Enhancement of photocatalytic activity for BiPO₄ via phase junction. J Mater Chem A, 2, 13041(2014).

[50] J W Xue, J Bao. Interfacial charge transfer of heterojunction photocatalysts: Characterization and calculation. Surf Interfaces, 25, 101265(2021).

[51] H Yang. A short review on heterojunction photocatalysts: Carrier transfer behavior and photocatalytic mechanisms. Mater Res Bull, 142, 111406(2021).

[52] L B Wang, B Cheng, L Y Zhang et al. In situ irradiated XPS investigation on S-scheme TiO₂@ZnIn₂S₄ photocatalyst for efficient photocatalytic CO₂ reduction. Small, 17, 2103447(2021).

[53] A Beck, X Huang, L Artiglia et al. The dynamics of overlayer formation on catalyst nanoparticles and strong metal-support interaction. Nat Commun, 11, 3220(2020).

[54] J L Vincent, P A Crozier. Atomic level fluxional behavior and activity of CeO₂-supported Pt catalysts for CO oxidation. Nat Commun, 12, 5789(2021).

[55] B H Simpson, J Rodríguez-López. Emerging techniques for the in situ analysis of reaction intermediates on photo-electrochemical interfaces. Anal Methods, 7, 7029(2015).

[56] Y Nosaka, A Y Nosaka. Generation and detection of reactive oxygen species in photocatalysis. Chem Rev, 117, 11302(2017).

[57] J Y Liu, Z D Wei, W F Shangguan. Defects engineering in photocatalytic water splitting materials. ChemCatChem, 11, 6177(2019).

[58] P A Connor, K D Dobson, A J McQuillan. Infrared spectroscopy of the TiO₂/aqueous solution interface. Langmuir, 15, 2402(1999).

[59] S Haschke, M Mader, S Schlicht et al. Direct oxygen isotope effect identifies the rate-determining step of electrocatalytic OER at an oxidic surface. Nat Commun, 9, 4565(2018).

[60] W Y Lin, H Frei. Photochemical and FT-IR probing of the active site of hydrogen peroxide in Ti silicalite sieve. J Am Chem Soc, 124, 9292(2002).

[61] X Rong, J Parolin, A M Kolpak. A fundamental relationship between reaction mechanism and stability in metal oxide catalysts for oxygen evolution. ACS Catal, 6, 1153(2016).

[62] O Zandi, T W Hamann. Determination of photoelectrochemical water oxidation intermediates on haematite electrode surfaces using operando infrared spectroscopy. Nat Chem, 8, 778(2016).

[63] Z Zou, J Ye, K Sayama et al. Direct splitting of water under visible light irradiation with an oxide semiconductor photocatalyst. Nature, 414, 625(2001).

[64] S H Guo, Y H Li, S W Tang et al. Monitoring hydrogen evolution reaction intermediates of transition metal dichalcogenides via operando Raman spectroscopy. Adv Funct Mater, 30, 2003035(2020).

[65] Y H Peng, M J Geng, J Q Yu et al. Vacancy-induced 2H@1T MoS₂ phase-incorporation on ZnIn₂S₄ for boosting photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Appl Catal B, 298, 120570(2021).

[66] L Q Ye, Z Y Ma, Y Deng et al. Robust and efficient photocatalytic hydrogen generation of ReS₂/CdS and mechanistic study by on-line mass spectrometry and in situ infrared spectroscopy. Appl Catal B, 257, 117897(2019).

[67] X Wang, X Wang, J Huang et al. Interfacial chemical bond and internal electric field modulated Z-scheme Sv-ZnIn₂S₄/MoSe₂ photocatalyst for efficient hydrogen evolution. Nat Commun, 12, 4112(2021).

[68] R Nakamura, Y Nakato. Primary intermediates of oxygen photoevolution reaction on TiO₂ (Rutile) particles, revealed by in situ FTIR absorption and photoluminescence measurements. J Am Chem Soc, 126, 1290(2004).

[69] M Zhang, M de Respinis, H Frei. Time-resolved observations of water oxidation intermediates on a cobalt oxide nanoparticle catalyst. Nat Chem, 6, 362(2014).

[70] Q Ding, Y Liu, T Chen et al. Unravelling the water oxidation mechanism on NaTaO₃-based photocatalysts. J Mater Chem A, 8, 6812(2020).

[71] F Fresno, S Galdón, M Barawi et al. Selectivity in UV photocatalytic CO₂ conversion over bare and silver-decorated niobium-tantalum perovskites. Catal Today, 361, 85(2021).

[72] M Halmann. Photoelectrochemical reduction of aqueous carbon dioxide on p-type gallium phosphide in liquid junction solar cells. Nature, 275, 115(1978).

[73] M Marszewski, S W Cao, J G Yu et al. Semiconductor-based photocatalytic CO₂ conversion. Mater Horiz, 2, 261(2015).

[74] H Rao, L C Schmidt, J Bonin et al. Visible-light-driven methane formation from CO₂ with a molecular iron catalyst. Nature, 548, 74(2017).

[75] M Schreier, F Héroguel, L Steier et al. Solar conversion of CO₂ to CO using Earth-abundant electrocatalysts prepared by atomic layer modification of CuO. Nat Energy, 2, 17087(2017).

[76] Y Wang, X Shang, J Shen et al. Direct and indirect Z-scheme heterostructure-coupled photosystem enabling cooperation of CO₂ reduction and H₂O oxidation. Nat Commun, 11, 3043(2020).

[77] Y Kou, Y Nabetani, M S Dai et al. Direct detection of key reaction intermediates in photochemical CO₂ reduction sensitized by a rhenium bipyridine complex. J Am Chem Soc, 136, 6021(2014).

[78] L J Liu, Y Li. Understanding the reaction mechanism of photocatalytic reduction of CO₂ with H₂O on TiO₂-based photocatalysts: A review. Aerosol Air Qual Res, 14, 453(2014).

[79] L J Liu, C Y Zhao, J T Miller et al. Mechanistic study of CO₂ photoreduction with H₂O on Cu/TiO₂ nanocomposites by in situ X-ray absorption and infrared spectroscopies. J Phys Chem C, 121, 490(2017).

[80] J Wu, X D Li, W Shi et al. Efficient visible-light-driven CO₂ reduction mediated by defect-engineered BiOBr atomic layers. Angew Chem Int Ed, 57, 8719(2018).

[81] S Chen, H Wang, Z Kang et al. Oxygen vacancy associated single-electron transfer for photofixation of CO₂ to long-chain chemicals. Nat Commun, 10, 788(2019).

[82] J C Zhu, W W Shao, X D Li et al. Asymmetric triple-atom sites confined in ternary oxide enabling selective CO₂ photothermal reduction to acetate. J Am Chem Soc, 143, 18233(2021).

[83] X J Ren, M C Gao, Y F Zhang et al. Photocatalytic reduction of CO₂ on BiOX: Effect of halogen element type and surface oxygen vacancy mediated mechanism. Appl Catal B, 274, 119063(2020).

[84] B A MacKay, M D Fryzuk. Dinitrogen coordination chemistry: The biomimetic borderlands. ChemInform, 35, 703(2004).

[85] H D Shen, M M Yang, L D Hao et al. Photocatalytic nitrogen reduction to ammonia: Insights into the role of defect engineering in photocatalysts. Nano Res, 275, 115(2021).

[86] J P Guo, P Chen. Catalyst: NH₃ as an energy carrier. Chem, 3, 709(2017).

[87] A J Medford, M C Hatzell. Photon-driven nitrogen fixation: Current progress, thermodynamic considerations, and future outlook. ACS Catal, 7, 2624(2017).

[88] B M Hoffman, D Lukoyanov, Z Y Yang et al. Mechanism of nitrogen fixation by nitrogenase: The next stage. Chem Rev, 114, 4041(2014).

[89] H P Jia, E A Quadrelli. Mechanistic aspects of dinitrogen cleavage and hydrogenation to produce ammonia in catalysis and organometallic chemistry: Relevance of metal hydride bonds and dihydrogen. Chem Soc Rev, 43, 547(2014).

[90] H Yuzawa, T Mori, H Itoh et al. Reaction mechanism of ammonia decomposition to nitrogen and hydrogen over metal loaded titanium oxide photocatalyst. J Phys Chem C, 116, 4126(2012).

[91] H Hirakawa, M Hashimoto, Y Shiraishi et al. Photocatalytic conversion of nitrogen to ammonia with water on surface oxygen vacancies of titanium dioxide. J Am Chem Soc, 139, 10929(2017).

[92] C C Li, T Wang, Z J Zhao et al. Promoted fixation of molecular nitrogen with surface oxygen vacancies on plasmon-enhanced TiO₂ photoelectrodes. Angew Chem, 130, 5376(2018).

[93] H Li, J Shang, Z H Ai et al. Efficient visible light nitrogen fixation with BiOBr nanosheets of oxygen vacancies on the exposed {001} facets. J Am Chem Soc, 137, 6393(2015).

[94] P S Li, Z A Zhou, Q Wang et al. Visible-light-driven nitrogen fixation catalyzed by Bi₅O₇Br nanostructures: Enhanced performance by oxygen vacancies. J Am Chem Soc, 142, 12430(2020).

[95] S Y Wang, X Hai, X Ding et al. Light-switchable oxygen vacancies in ultrafine Bi₅O₇Br nanotubes for boosting solar-driven nitrogen fixation in pure water. Adv Mater, 29, 1701774(2017).

[96] J H Yang, Y Z Guo, R B Jiang et al. High-efficiency “working-in-tandem” nitrogen photofixation achieved by assembling plasmonic gold nanocrystals on ultrathin titania nanosheets. J Am Chem Soc, 140, 8497(2018).

[97] F Rao, G Q Zhu, W B Zhang et al. In-situ generation of oxygen vacancies and metallic bismuth from (BiO)₂CO₃ via N₂-assisted thermal-treatment for efficient selective photocatalytic NO removal. Appl Catal B, 281, 119481(2021).

[98] H Shang, M Q Li, H Li et al. Oxygen vacancies promoted the selective photocatalytic removal of NO with blue TiO₂ via simultaneous molecular oxygen activation and photogenerated hole annihilation. Environ Sci Technol, 53, 6444(2019).

[99] H Jin, R You, S Zhou et al. In-situ DRIFTS and XANES identification of copper species in the ternary composite oxide catalysts CuMnCeO during CO preferential oxidation. Int J Hydrog Energy, 40, 3919(2015).

[100] D Zigah, J Rodríguez-López, A J Bard. Quantification of photoelectrogenerated hydroxyl radical on TiO₂ by surface interrogation scanning electrochemical microscopy. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 14, 12764(2012).

[101] L B Kreuzer, C K Patel. Nitric oxide air pollution: Detection by optoacoustic spectroscopy. Science, 173, 45(1971).

[102] S Jin, G H Dong, J M Luo et al. Improved photocatalytic NO removal activity of SrTiO₃ by using SrCO₃ as a new co-catalyst. Appl Catal B, 227, 24(2018).

[103] Y F Lu, Y Huang, Y F Zhang et al. Oxygen vacancy engineering of Bi₂O₃/Bi₂O₂CO₃ heterojunctions: Implications of the interfacial charge transfer, NO adsorption and removal. Appl Catal B, 231, 357(2018).

[104] R Nakamura, A Imanishi, K Murakoshi et al. In situ FTIR studies of primary intermediates of photocatalytic reactions on nanocrystalline TiO₂ films in contact with aqueous solutions. J Am Chem Soc, 125, 7443(2003).