Author Affiliations
1Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, School of Optical and Electronic Information, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China2State Key Laboratory of Optical Communication Technologies and Networks, Wuhan Research Institute of Posts and Telecommunications, Wuhan 430074, China3e-mail: xxiao@wri.com.cnshow less
Fig. 1. Conceptual diagram of the wideband adaptive MFIS using an integrated silicon photonic scanning filter.
Fig. 2. Experiment setup of the MFIS. TLS, tunable laser source; PC, polarization controller; RF, radio frequency; IM, intensity modulator; EDFA, erbium-doped fiber amplifier; EAWG, electrical arbitrary waveform generator; ATT, attenuator; PD, photodetector; OSC, oscilloscope.
Fig. 3. Characteristics of the integrated silicon photonic scanning filter and measured results of the time-invariant SF signals. (a) Micrograph of the high-Q MRR. (b) Spectral response of the MRR at different DC voltages. (c) Wavelength drift as a function of the loaded voltage. (d) Function between the microwave frequency and the delay. (e) Estimated frequency (red dots) and corresponding error (blue dots), and the inset histogram shows the distribution of different errors.
Fig. 4. Measurement results of time-invariant MF identification. (a) 2, 10, and 12 GHz. (b) 2–30 GHz, stepped by 2 GHz. (c) 2–20 GHz, stepped by 0.5 GHz. (d) 2 and 2.375 GHz.
Fig. 5. RF response of the IM.
Fig. 6. Theoretical simulation model for FM signal identification. (a) Scanning frequency of the filter. (b) Chirped frequency. (c) Hopping frequency with respect to time in one scanning period.
Fig. 7. Simulated results for FM signal identification. CF at a center frequency of 20 GHz with different spans of (a) 16 GHz and (b) 1 GHz. FH from 2 to 18 GHz stepped by (c) 16 GHz and (d) 0.5 GHz.
Fig. 8. Measurement results of CF microwave signals. The red line is the ESA measured frequency; the blue line is the MFIS measured frequency. (a), (b), and (c) CF at a center frequency of 20 GHz with different spans of 16, 4, and 1 GHz, respectively. (e), (f), and (g) CF of different center frequencies at 4, 16, and 24 GHz, respectively, with the same span of 4 GHz. (d) and (h) are the measured frequency versus the input frequency.
Fig. 9. Measurement results of FH microwave signals from 2 to 18 GHz. (a) Stepped by 16 GHz. (b) Stepped by 4 GHz. (c) Stepped by 1 GHz. (d) Stepped by 0.5 GHz. The red line is the ESA measured frequency; the blue line is the MFIS measured frequency.
Fig. 10. Measurement results of simultaneous multitype microwave signals. (a) Simultaneous FH signal and CF signal. (b) Simultaneous SF signal and CF signal. (c) Simultaneous SF signal and FH signal. The input frequency parameters are labeled in each graph.
Fig. 11. Measured amplitude results of a 20 GHz microwave signal.
Microwave Type | Pulse Filled | Envelope | Typical Waveform | SF | No | Single | | MF | No | Multiple | | CF | Yes | Continuous | | FH | No | Discrete | |
|
Table 1. Classification Criterion of Measured Microwave Signals
Technology | Range (GHz) | Accuracy (MHz) | Input | Chip Dimensions | Si gratings [15] | 0–32 | 755 rms | S | μm | FWM [14] | 0–40 | 318.9 rms | S | | SBS [31] | 9–38 | 1 | M(2) | 6.5 cm | InP MZI [13] | 5–15 | 200 rms | S | | Ring resonator [11] | 0.5–4 | 93.6 rms | S | μm | Si microdisk [10] | 9–19 | 200 | S | μm | SMF [26] | 20, 40 | 20 GHz | M(2) | Bulky | Frequency shifter [29] | 0.1–20 | 250 | M(2) | Bulky | This work | 1–30 | 237.3 rms | M(37) | |
|
Table 2. Performance Comparison of Existing MFISs, where “S” Denotes Single Frequency Measurement and “M” Denotes Multiple Frequency Measurement