Author Affiliations
1Department of Natural Sciences, Hoa Lu University, Ninh Nhat, Ninh Binh City, Viet Nam2Institute of Theoretical and Applied Research, Duy Tan University, Hanoi 100000, Viet Nam3Faculty of Natural Sciences, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam4Institute of Physics, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 10 Dao Tan, Ba Dinh, Hanoi, Vietnam5Institute of Materials Science, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Caugiay, Hanoi, Vietnamshow less
Fig. 1. (Color online) (a) XRD pattern ofα-Fe2O3 NPs samples. (b) Magnification of (104) planevs. Sn concentration. (c) 2θ position of (104) planevs. Sn concentration plot for changing Sn concentration.
Fig. 2. SEM top–view images ofα-Fe2O3 NPs with varied Sn concentrations as 0% Sn (S1), 1.0% Sn (S2), 2.5% Sn (S3) and 4.0% Sn (S4) samples.
Fig. 3. (Color online) (a) TEM image and average diameter size, (b) EDS spectrum and (c) FTIR spectrum of the pureα-Fe2O3 NPs (S1) and 2.5% Sn-α-Fe2O3 NPs (S3) samples and (d) Raman spectrum of S1–S4 samples.
Fig. 4. (Color online) (a) The absorption spectra ofα-Fe2O3 NPs for varying Sn concentration (0%, 1.0%, 2.5% and 4.0%), and (αhν)2vs. energy plot for calculation of bandgap of different Sn–doping concentrationsα-Fe2O3 NPs for (b) 0% Sn (S1), (c) 1.0% Sn (S2), (d) 2.5% Sn (S3), (e) 4.0% Sn (S4) samples, respectively.
Fig. 5. (Color online) UV–Vis absorption spectra of Congo red during different stage (at 15, and 30 min interval) of photocatalytic reaction ofα-Fe2O3 NPs with varied Sn doping concentration as (a) 0% Sn (S1), (b) 1.0% Sn (S2), (c) 2.5% Sn (S3) and (d) 4.0% Sn (S4) samples.
Fig. 6. (Color online) (a) Effect of Sn-α-Fe2O3 NPs catalyst dosage on photodegradation efficiency of CR dye solution. (b) Plot of ln (Co/C) as a function of irradiation time for photocatalysis of Congo red solution containing:α-Fe2O3 and Sn-dopedα-Fe2O3 NPs.
Sample | Sn concentration(%) | Averagecrystallitesize (nm) | BETsurface area (m2/g) | Eg(eV) | Unit cell parameter (Å) | Congo red (mg/L) | Degradation efficiency (%) |
---|
a | c |
---|
Sn-α-Fe2O3−S1 | 0.0 | 20.35 | 26.4656 | 2.57 | 5.0237 | 13.6904 | 10 | 84.6 | Sn-α-Fe2O3−S2 | 1.0 | 19.82 | 27.0181 | 2.48 | 5.0271 | 13.7046 | 10 | 69.2 | Sn-α-Fe2O3−S3 | 2.5 | 15.89 | 31.1234 | 2.46 | 5.0237 | 13.7346 | 10 | 97.8 | Sn-α-Fe2O3−S4 | 4.0 | 21.74 | 25.9516 | 2.40 | 5.0351 | 13.7411 | 10 | 81.8 |
|
Table 0. The parameters of Sn doped toα-Fe2O3 nanoparticles and their degradation characteristics.
Photocatalyst | Particle size(nm) | Dyes | Dopant concentration (%) | Weightcatalyst(mg) | Irradiationtime (min) | Degradationefficiency(%) | Ref. |
---|
Sn/α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles | 41.4 | Congo red | 2.5 | 30 | 120 | 97.8 | This work | Sn/α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles | 12 | Methylene blue | 5.0 | 50 | 90 | 94.7 | [10] | α-Fe2O3/ASCM nanoparticles | 50 | 95 | 400 | 100 | 100 | [6] | 3,5 diacrylamidobenzoic acid based resin | − | Congo red | − | 280 | 1440 | 92.03 | [8] | Ni1–xMxFe2O3 nanosheets | 20–24 | Congo red | 10 | 10 | 300 | 97 | [49] | 2, 2’-bpy/α-Fe2O3-S nanorods | 80, 300 | Bisphenol A | − | 50 | 360 | 95.2 | [12] | Ni/α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles | 35 | Rose bengal | 4.0 | 50 | 90 | 80.0 | [13] | γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles | 35 | Methylene blue | − | 25 | 40 | 98.9 | [10] | α–Fe2O3 nanoparticles | 27 | Rose bengal | − | 15 | 135 | 98.0 | [30] |
|
Table 0. Compression of photocatalyst characteristics ofα-Fe2O3 and other materials to varying organic dyes.