• Journal of Semiconductors
  • Vol. 43, Issue 12, 122001 (2022)
Van Nang Lam1、*, Thi Bich Vu2、3, Quang Dat Do1, Thi Thanh Xuan Le1, Tien Dai Nguyen2、3、**, T.-Thanh-Bao Nguyen4, Hoang Tung Do4, and Thi Tu Oanh Nguyen5
Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Natural Sciences, Hoa Lu University, Ninh Nhat, Ninh Binh City, Viet Nam
  • 2Institute of Theoretical and Applied Research, Duy Tan University, Hanoi 100000, Viet Nam
  • 3Faculty of Natural Sciences, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
  • 4Institute of Physics, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 10 Dao Tan, Ba Dinh, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • 5Institute of Materials Science, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Caugiay, Hanoi, Vietnam
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1088/1674-4926/43/12/122001 Cite this Article
    Van Nang Lam, Thi Bich Vu, Quang Dat Do, Thi Thanh Xuan Le, Tien Dai Nguyen, T.-Thanh-Bao Nguyen, Hoang Tung Do, Thi Tu Oanh Nguyen. One-step hydrothermal synthesis of Sn-dopedα-Fe2O3 nanoparticles for enhanced photocatalytic degradation of Congo red[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2022, 43(12): 122001 Copy Citation Text show less
    (Color online) (a) XRD pattern ofα-Fe2O3 NPs samples. (b) Magnification of (104) planevs. Sn concentration. (c) 2θ position of (104) planevs. Sn concentration plot for changing Sn concentration.
    Fig. 1. (Color online) (a) XRD pattern ofα-Fe2O3 NPs samples. (b) Magnification of (104) planevs. Sn concentration. (c) 2θ position of (104) planevs. Sn concentration plot for changing Sn concentration.
    SEM top–view images ofα-Fe2O3 NPs with varied Sn concentrations as 0% Sn (S1), 1.0% Sn (S2), 2.5% Sn (S3) and 4.0% Sn (S4) samples.
    Fig. 2. SEM top–view images ofα-Fe2O3 NPs with varied Sn concentrations as 0% Sn (S1), 1.0% Sn (S2), 2.5% Sn (S3) and 4.0% Sn (S4) samples.
    (Color online) (a) TEM image and average diameter size, (b) EDS spectrum and (c) FTIR spectrum of the pureα-Fe2O3 NPs (S1) and 2.5% Sn-α-Fe2O3 NPs (S3) samples and (d) Raman spectrum of S1–S4 samples.
    Fig. 3. (Color online) (a) TEM image and average diameter size, (b) EDS spectrum and (c) FTIR spectrum of the pureα-Fe2O3 NPs (S1) and 2.5% Sn-α-Fe2O3 NPs (S3) samples and (d) Raman spectrum of S1–S4 samples.
    (Color online) (a) The absorption spectra ofα-Fe2O3 NPs for varying Sn concentration (0%, 1.0%, 2.5% and 4.0%), and (αhν)2vs. energy plot for calculation of bandgap of different Sn–doping concentrationsα-Fe2O3 NPs for (b) 0% Sn (S1), (c) 1.0% Sn (S2), (d) 2.5% Sn (S3), (e) 4.0% Sn (S4) samples, respectively.
    Fig. 4. (Color online) (a) The absorption spectra ofα-Fe2O3 NPs for varying Sn concentration (0%, 1.0%, 2.5% and 4.0%), and (αhν)2vs. energy plot for calculation of bandgap of different Sn–doping concentrationsα-Fe2O3 NPs for (b) 0% Sn (S1), (c) 1.0% Sn (S2), (d) 2.5% Sn (S3), (e) 4.0% Sn (S4) samples, respectively.
    (Color online) UV–Vis absorption spectra of Congo red during different stage (at 15, and 30 min interval) of photocatalytic reaction ofα-Fe2O3 NPs with varied Sn doping concentration as (a) 0% Sn (S1), (b) 1.0% Sn (S2), (c) 2.5% Sn (S3) and (d) 4.0% Sn (S4) samples.
    Fig. 5. (Color online) UV–Vis absorption spectra of Congo red during different stage (at 15, and 30 min interval) of photocatalytic reaction ofα-Fe2O3 NPs with varied Sn doping concentration as (a) 0% Sn (S1), (b) 1.0% Sn (S2), (c) 2.5% Sn (S3) and (d) 4.0% Sn (S4) samples.
    (Color online) (a) Effect of Sn-α-Fe2O3 NPs catalyst dosage on photodegradation efficiency of CR dye solution. (b) Plot of ln (Co/C) as a function of irradiation time for photocatalysis of Congo red solution containing:α-Fe2O3 and Sn-dopedα-Fe2O3 NPs.
    Fig. 6. (Color online) (a) Effect of Sn-α-Fe2O3 NPs catalyst dosage on photodegradation efficiency of CR dye solution. (b) Plot of ln (Co/C) as a function of irradiation time for photocatalysis of Congo red solution containing:α-Fe2O3 and Sn-dopedα-Fe2O3 NPs.
    SampleSn concentration(%)Averagecrystallitesize (nm)BETsurface area (m2/g)Eg(eV)Unit cell parameter (Å) Congo red (mg/L)Degradation efficiency (%)
    ac
    Sn-α-Fe2O3−S10.0 20.35 26.46562.575.023713.6904 10 84.6
    Sn-α-Fe2O3−S21.0 19.82 27.01812.485.027113.7046 10 69.2
    Sn-α-Fe2O3−S32.5 15.89 31.12342.465.023713.7346 10 97.8
    Sn-α-Fe2O3−S44.0 21.74 25.95162.405.035113.7411 10 81.8
    Table 0. The parameters of Sn doped toα-Fe2O3 nanoparticles and their degradation characteristics.
    PhotocatalystParticle size(nm) DyesDopant concentration (%)Weightcatalyst(mg)Irradiationtime (min)Degradationefficiency(%)Ref.
    Sn/α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles41.4Congo red2.53012097.8This work
    Sn/α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles12Methylene blue5.0509094.7[10]
    α-Fe2O3/ASCM nanoparticles5095400100100[6]
    3,5 diacrylamidobenzoic acid based resinCongo red280144092.03[8]
    Ni1–xMxFe2O3 nanosheets20–24Congo red101030097[49]
    2, 2’-bpy/α-Fe2O3-S nanorods80, 300Bisphenol A5036095.2[12]
    Ni/α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles35Rose bengal4.0509080.0[13]
    γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles35Methylene blue254098.9[10]
    α–Fe2O3 nanoparticles27Rose bengal1513598.0[30]
    Table 0. Compression of photocatalyst characteristics ofα-Fe2O3 and other materials to varying organic dyes.
    Van Nang Lam, Thi Bich Vu, Quang Dat Do, Thi Thanh Xuan Le, Tien Dai Nguyen, T.-Thanh-Bao Nguyen, Hoang Tung Do, Thi Tu Oanh Nguyen. One-step hydrothermal synthesis of Sn-dopedα-Fe2O3 nanoparticles for enhanced photocatalytic degradation of Congo red[J]. Journal of Semiconductors, 2022, 43(12): 122001
    Download Citation