• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 41, Issue 14, 1430003 (2021)
Hao Liu1、2, Mai Hu2、3, Xiang Chen2, Hao Deng2, Zhenyu Xu2, Qiang Wang4, Xiang Li2, Ruifeng Kan2、aff******, and Xianyi Zhang1、aff***
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Physics and Electronic Information, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui 241002, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Environmental Optics and Technology, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Institute of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, Anhui 230031, China
  • 3University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China
  • 4State Key Laboratory of Applied Optics, Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, Jilin 130033, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS202141.1430003 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Hao Liu, Mai Hu, Xiang Chen, Hao Deng, Zhenyu Xu, Qiang Wang, Xiang Li, Ruifeng Kan, Xianyi Zhang. Sensitive Detection of CH4 and CO2 Using Frequency-Division-Multiplexing Based Quartz-Enhanced Photoacoustic Spectroscopy[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2021, 41(14): 1430003 Copy Citation Text show less
    Simulated absorption spectra of different gases at different wavelengths. (a) 1654 nm; (b) 2004 nm
    Fig. 1. Simulated absorption spectra of different gases at different wavelengths. (a) 1654 nm; (b) 2004 nm
    Structural diagram of system
    Fig. 2. Structural diagram of system
    Frequency response curve of QTF
    Fig. 3. Frequency response curve of QTF
    Spectral comparison of raw photoacoustic signals for CH4 and CO2 at different laser modulation frequencies
    Fig. 4. Spectral comparison of raw photoacoustic signals for CH4 and CO2 at different laser modulation frequencies
    Comparison of second harmonic signal amplitude under single beam and combined beam. (a) CH4; (b) CO2
    Fig. 5. Comparison of second harmonic signal amplitude under single beam and combined beam. (a) CH4; (b) CO2
    Second harmonic signal amplitudes of CH4 and CO2 at different scanning frequencies. (a) CH4; (b) CO2
    Fig. 6. Second harmonic signal amplitudes of CH4 and CO2 at different scanning frequencies. (a) CH4; (b) CO2
    Second harmonic signal amplitudes of CH4 and CO2 decoded at different modulation current amplitudes. (a) CH4; (b) CO2
    Fig. 7. Second harmonic signal amplitudes of CH4 and CO2 decoded at different modulation current amplitudes. (a) CH4; (b) CO2
    Second harmonic signal amplitudes of CH4 and CO2 with different concentrations. (a) CH4; (b) CO2
    Fig. 8. Second harmonic signal amplitudes of CH4 and CO2 with different concentrations. (a) CH4; (b) CO2
    Second harmonic signal amplitude versus concentration for CH4 and CO2. (a) CH4; (b) CO2
    Fig. 9. Second harmonic signal amplitude versus concentration for CH4 and CO2. (a) CH4; (b) CO2
    Allan deviation analysis of system. (a) CH4; (b) CO2
    Fig. 10. Allan deviation analysis of system. (a) CH4; (b) CO2
    Hao Liu, Mai Hu, Xiang Chen, Hao Deng, Zhenyu Xu, Qiang Wang, Xiang Li, Ruifeng Kan, Xianyi Zhang. Sensitive Detection of CH4 and CO2 Using Frequency-Division-Multiplexing Based Quartz-Enhanced Photoacoustic Spectroscopy[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2021, 41(14): 1430003
    Download Citation