• Opto-Electronic Advances
  • Vol. 4, Issue 8, 210031-1 (2021)
Leonid Yu. Beliaev1, Osamu Takayama1, Pavel N. Melentiev2、3, and Andrei V. Lavrinenko1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1DTU Fotonik-Department of Photonics Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Ørsteds Plads 343, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
  • 2Institute of Spectroscopy RAS, Moscow 108840, Russia
  • 3Higher School of Economics, National Research University, Moscow 101000, Russia
  • show less
    DOI: 10.29026/oea.2021.210031 Cite this Article
    Leonid Yu. Beliaev, Osamu Takayama, Pavel N. Melentiev, Andrei V. Lavrinenko. Photoluminescence control by hyperbolic metamaterials and metasurfaces: a review[J]. Opto-Electronic Advances, 2021, 4(8): 210031-1 Copy Citation Text show less
    Schematic illustration of hyperbolic metamaterials and metasurfaces. (a) Type I hyperbolic metamaterials (εo > 0 and εe b) Type II hyperbolic metamaterials (εo εe > 0) in metal-dielectric multilayer configuration and their dispersion in the wavevector space.
    Fig. 1. Schematic illustration of hyperbolic metamaterials and metasurfaces. (a) Type I hyperbolic metamaterials (εo > 0 and εe < 0) in metallic nanorod or nanowire configuration and their representative dispersion in the wavevector space (k-space). ( b) Type II hyperbolic metamaterials (εo < 0 and εe > 0) in metal-dielectric multilayer configuration and their dispersion in the wavevector space.
    Photoluminescence enhancement by metal-dielectric multilayer HMMs. (a) Schematic illustration of Ag-TiO2 multilayer HMM structures. (b) The real part of effective ordinary and extraordinary permittivities. (c) Time-resolved photoluminescence from QDs deposited on the HMM, control sample, and glass substrate at 605, 621, and 635 nm. (d) Lifetime of the QDs as a function of wavelength on the HMM, control sample, and glass substrate. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.54. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).
    Fig. 2. Photoluminescence enhancement by metal-dielectric multilayer HMMs. (a) Schematic illustration of Ag-TiO2 multilayer HMM structures. (b) The real part of effective ordinary and extraordinary permittivities. (c) Time-resolved photoluminescence from QDs deposited on the HMM, control sample, and glass substrate at 605, 621, and 635 nm. (d) Lifetime of the QDs as a function of wavelength on the HMM, control sample, and glass substrate. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.54. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).
    Photoluminescence enhancement by metal-dielectric multilayer HMM cavities. (a) Schematic illustration of the WS2 monolayer on the HMM cavities. (b) Type I hyperbolic iso-frequency contour of the HMM. (c) Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) image of the cross section of a WS2 monolayer on a HMM cavity with chemical composition analysis. (d,e) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of HMM cavities with pseudo colors. (f) Normalized calculated scattering and absorption at cross sections of the HMM cavities with a diameter of 160 nm and a pitch of 380 nm at the bottom. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.90, American Chemical Society.
    Fig. 3. Photoluminescence enhancement by metal-dielectric multilayer HMM cavities. (a) Schematic illustration of the WS2 monolayer on the HMM cavities. (b) Type I hyperbolic iso-frequency contour of the HMM. (c) Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) image of the cross section of a WS2 monolayer on a HMM cavity with chemical composition analysis. (d,e) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of HMM cavities with pseudo colors. (f) Normalized calculated scattering and absorption at cross sections of the HMM cavities with a diameter of 160 nm and a pitch of 380 nm at the bottom. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.90, American Chemical Society.
    Photoluminescence enhancement on trench hyperbolic metasurface. (a,b) SEM images of InGaAsP MQW trenches of 100 nm height and 40 nm width, separated by 40 nm trenches. Ag is deposited by sputtering, partially filling the trenches to create a HMS with 80 nm period. (c) Illustration of optical pumping with different polarizations (TMP‖ or TEP⊥ of the HMS results in collected emission polarized predominantly parallel (TME||) to the metasurface. KB is the Bloch wavevector. Figure reproduced from ref.56, under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
    Fig. 4. Photoluminescence enhancement on trench hyperbolic metasurface. (a,b) SEM images of InGaAsP MQW trenches of 100 nm height and 40 nm width, separated by 40 nm trenches. Ag is deposited by sputtering, partially filling the trenches to create a HMS with 80 nm period. (c) Illustration of optical pumping with different polarizations (TMP or TEP of the HMS results in collected emission polarized predominantly parallel (TME||) to the metasurface. KB is the Bloch wavevector. Figure reproduced from ref.56, under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
    Plasmonic nanowire-based HMMs. (a) An array of Au nanorods with approximately 38 nm diameter, 150 nm height and 80 nm spacing embedded in a dye-doped PMMA matrix. (b) Emission in waveguided modes. Experimental dispersions of the photoluminescence (PL) enhancement measured for TM-polarized emission whose position reproduced from the reflection dispersion is shown as shaded area. Gray dotted line is the light line in air, bulk greyed region is the emission band of LD700 dye. Figure reproduced with permission from: ref.103, American Chemical Society.
    Fig. 5. Plasmonic nanowire-based HMMs. (a) An array of Au nanorods with approximately 38 nm diameter, 150 nm height and 80 nm spacing embedded in a dye-doped PMMA matrix. (b) Emission in waveguided modes. Experimental dispersions of the photoluminescence (PL) enhancement measured for TM-polarized emission whose position reproduced from the reflection dispersion is shown as shaded area. Gray dotted line is the light line in air, bulk greyed region is the emission band of LD700 dye. Figure reproduced with permission from: ref.103, American Chemical Society.
    1D grating out-couplers on multilayer HMMs. Schematic illustration of (a) Ag slab, (b) Ag grating, (c) Ag/Si HMM, and (d) Ag/Si HMM with grating. R6G fluorescence dye is in PMMA layers. Gratings period is 200 nm.
    Fig. 6. 1D grating out-couplers on multilayer HMMs. Schematic illustration of (a) Ag slab, (b) Ag grating, (c) Ag/Si HMM, and (d) Ag/Si HMM with grating. R6G fluorescence dye is in PMMA layers. Gratings period is 200 nm.
    1D and 2D grating out-couplers on multilayer HMMs. (a) Schematic illustration and (b) SEM images of HMM with 1D gratings. HMM is composed of four periods of Ag (12 nm thick) and SiO2 (83 nm) layers on top of 100 nm thick Ag substrate as a reflector. The pitch of grating is P = 300 nm. A thin layer of QDs in PMMA is spin-coated on top of the HMM structures. (c) Schematic of 2D grating in Ag film on HMM with 6 periods of Ag (12 nm) and Al2O3 (23 nm) layers. (d) SEM image of 2D Ag on top of the PMMA layer with an average period of 500 nm and hole size of 160 nm (top view). (e) Cross-section view of transmission electron microscope (TEM) image of HMM made of Ag (dark color, 15 nm), Al2O3 (bright color, 15 nm), and embedded QD layer (false color). The bottom and top layers are glass substrate (false yellow) and Pt protection (false violet) layer, respectively (shown in false color). (f) SEM image of the top view of 2D gratings on HMMs with lattice constant of 255−370 nm with air hole radius of 52−80 nm. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a, b) ref.112, American Chemical Society; (c, d) ref.113, under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 4.0 International License; (e, f) ref.114, PNAS.
    Fig. 7. 1D and 2D grating out-couplers on multilayer HMMs. (a) Schematic illustration and (b) SEM images of HMM with 1D gratings. HMM is composed of four periods of Ag (12 nm thick) and SiO2 (83 nm) layers on top of 100 nm thick Ag substrate as a reflector. The pitch of grating is P = 300 nm. A thin layer of QDs in PMMA is spin-coated on top of the HMM structures. (c) Schematic of 2D grating in Ag film on HMM with 6 periods of Ag (12 nm) and Al2O3 (23 nm) layers. (d) SEM image of 2D Ag on top of the PMMA layer with an average period of 500 nm and hole size of 160 nm (top view). (e) Cross-section view of transmission electron microscope (TEM) image of HMM made of Ag (dark color, 15 nm), Al2O3 (bright color, 15 nm), and embedded QD layer (false color). The bottom and top layers are glass substrate (false yellow) and Pt protection (false violet) layer, respectively (shown in false color). (f) SEM image of the top view of 2D gratings on HMMs with lattice constant of 255−370 nm with air hole radius of 52−80 nm. Figure reproduced with permission from: (a, b) ref.112, American Chemical Society; (c, d) ref.113, under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 4.0 International License; (e, f) ref.114, PNAS.
    Epsilon-near-zero (ENZ) materials. Sketches of the (a) single ENZ (MIM) and (b) double ENZ (MIMIM) structures. A 50 nm thin Al2O3 layer has been deposited on top of each structure as a spacer between the dye (CsPbBr3 nanocrystals) and the Ag layer. (c) Spontaneous emission and decay times of CsPbBr3 nanocubes deposited on a bare Al2O3 substrate (black), a MIM (red), and a MIMIM (blue) structure 1D grating. (d) PL enhancement by plasmonic nanostructures. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.135, American Chemical Society.
    Fig. 8. Epsilon-near-zero (ENZ) materials. Sketches of the (a) single ENZ (MIM) and (b) double ENZ (MIMIM) structures. A 50 nm thin Al2O3 layer has been deposited on top of each structure as a spacer between the dye (CsPbBr3 nanocrystals) and the Ag layer. (c) Spontaneous emission and decay times of CsPbBr3 nanocubes deposited on a bare Al2O3 substrate (black), a MIM (red), and a MIMIM (blue) structure 1D grating. (d) PL enhancement by plasmonic nanostructures. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.135, American Chemical Society.
    Active HMM structure: (a) dye molecules mixed in PMMA located on top of HMM; (b) dye molecules arranged in dielectric layers of HMM; (c) energy diagram of a four-level dye molecule, with an absorption (blue) and emission line (red). Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref.148, American Physical Society; (b) ref.149, American Chemical Society.
    Fig. 9. Active HMM structure: (a) dye molecules mixed in PMMA located on top of HMM; (b) dye molecules arranged in dielectric layers of HMM; (c) energy diagram of a four-level dye molecule, with an absorption (blue) and emission line (red). Figure reproduced with permission from: (a) ref.148, American Physical Society; (b) ref.149, American Chemical Society.
    FDTD simulations and analytical calculations of emitter-HMM coupling in light reflectance: (a) reflectance with an absorption line in the weak coupling regime, (b) strong coupling regime for the finite structure of HMM Fig. 9(b) (logarithmic scale), (c) real and imaginary parts of the complex eigenfrequencies Ω± obtained with the model (green curves) in the strong coupling regime. The green and magenta curves are obtained via semi-classical model for two different modes (Eq. (9)). The blue dashed curve is the excitonic absorption line and black dashed curve is the unperturbed optical mode. The two polaritons resulting from the coupling of the optical mode with the excitonic line are identified by numbers 1 and 2 (Ω− and Ω+, respectively). Figure reproduced with permission from ref.149, American Chemical Society.
    Fig. 10. FDTD simulations and analytical calculations of emitter-HMM coupling in light reflectance: (a) reflectance with an absorption line in the weak coupling regime, (b) strong coupling regime for the finite structure of HMM Fig. 9(b) (logarithmic scale), (c) real and imaginary parts of the complex eigenfrequencies Ω± obtained with the model (green curves) in the strong coupling regime. The green and magenta curves are obtained via semi-classical model for two different modes (Eq. (9)). The blue dashed curve is the excitonic absorption line and black dashed curve is the unperturbed optical mode. The two polaritons resulting from the coupling of the optical mode with the excitonic line are identified by numbers 1 and 2 (Ω and Ω+, respectively). Figure reproduced with permission from ref.149, American Chemical Society.
    Exceptional points (EP) in the system formed by four-level dye molecules embedded in the dielectric medium of multilayer HMMs: (a) group index in z direction ng,z of the dye infiltrated multilayer, (b) zoom on EP1, (c) zoom on EP3. Orange curves correspond to the band edges at the Brillouin zone center kzD= 0, magenta curves correspond to the band edges at the Brillouin zone edge kzD= π, and cyan curves correspond to the gain-loss compensation line where Im(cos(kzD)) = 0. Figure reproduced with permission from: ref.149, American Chemical Society.
    Fig. 11. Exceptional points (EP) in the system formed by four-level dye molecules embedded in the dielectric medium of multilayer HMMs: (a) group index in z direction ng,z of the dye infiltrated multilayer, (b) zoom on EP1, (c) zoom on EP3. Orange curves correspond to the band edges at the Brillouin zone center kzD = 0, magenta curves correspond to the band edges at the Brillouin zone edge kzD = π, and cyan curves correspond to the gain-loss compensation line where Im(cos(kzD )) = 0. Figure reproduced with permission from: ref.149, American Chemical Society.
    Coherent interaction between HMM and multiple emitters leading to strong coupling: (a) schematic diagram of HMM with QDs on top of the polymer spacer, (b) PL measurement on QD monolayer. The magnitude of the splitting of the various PL peaks are indicated by the quantity ΔEexp. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.109, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
    Fig. 12. Coherent interaction between HMM and multiple emitters leading to strong coupling: (a) schematic diagram of HMM with QDs on top of the polymer spacer, (b) PL measurement on QD monolayer. The magnitude of the splitting of the various PL peaks are indicated by the quantity ΔEexp. Figure reproduced with permission from ref.109, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
    HMM structures and materialsEmitters (emission peak wavelength)Enhancement factorReferences (year)
    Au(19 nm)/Al2O3(19 nm), 8 periods Rhodamine 800 (715 nm)1.8-fold reduction of lifetimeref.67 (2010)
    Ag(25 nm, 11 layers)/PMMA(30 nm, 10 layers); Ag(30 nm, 5 layers)/LiF(40 nm, 4 layers); Ag(30 nm)/LiF(40 nm) 8 periods, and Ag(20 nm)/MgF2(30 nm) 8 periods IR-140 dye (850 nm)1.4 for Ag/LiF; 5.7 for Ag/PMMAref.68 (2011)
    Au(19 nm)/Al2O3(19 nm), 8 periods Rhodamine 800 (720 nm)9.3ref.69 (2012)
    Ag(9 nm)/TiO2(22 nm), 10 periods CdSe/ZnS colloidal QDs (630 nm)3ref.54 (2012)
    Au(15 nm)/Al2O3(28 nm), 10 periods Coumarin 500 (480 nm)2ref.70 (2013)
    Au(19 nm)/Al2O3(19 nm), 8 periods NVC (637 nm)2.57ref.71 (2013)
    Au nanoparticles (15 nm)/CdTe QDs (5.5 nm), separated by dielectric (PDDA/PPS) spacers with varied thickness (0–10 nm), 2–5 periodsCdTe QDs (590 nm)4.4ref.74, 75 (2011, 2014)
    TiN(8.5 nm)/Al0.7Sc0.3N(6.3 nm),10 periods NVC (600–800 nm)4.7 max Purcell factorref.72 (2015)
    TiN(15 nm)/SiO2(15 nm), 5 periods 20 nm thick Si QDs (720 nm)1.6ref.73 (2015)
    Ag(25 nm) 7 layers /MgF2(35 nm) 6 layers HITC dye-doped polymeric film (860 nm) 7ref.78 (2015)
    Ag(10 nm)/TiO2(30 nm), 10 periods Rhodamine 6G (R6G, 540–600 nm)80-fold intensity enhancementref.85 (2018)
    Au(26.87–37.31%)/poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), 4 periodsR6G dye (540–600 nm)1.55 for HMM1, 1.18 for HMM2ref.86 (2018)
    Ag(22 nm)/MoO3(10 nm) 6 periods, HMM; Ag(12 nm)/MoO3(20 nm) 6 periods, elliptic ZnO nanoparticles (395 nm)Lasing threshold 20% less and 6 times emission intensityref.76 (2018)
    Al(20 nm)/MgF2(20 nm), 4 periods 15-nm thick AlGaN MQWs (318 nm)160-fold emission rateref.77 (2018)
    Au(30 nm)/ZnS(30 nm) 5 periods, with cylindrical gold patch antennaSiC (900 nm)Purcell factor of 400 at 850 nm. (Theory)ref.87 (2018)
    Ag(25 nm)/PMMA(30 nm), 5 periodsZinc tetraphenylporphyrin (ZnTPP), S1 (580–670 nm), S2 (400–460 nm) 18-fold increase in fluorescence intensity from S2 state to S1. ref.79 (2018)
    320 nm thick HMM of Ag/ITO with unit cell thickness from 20 to 80 nmCdSe/ZnS QDs (550 nm)40-fold intensity enhancementref.83 (2018)
    Quinoidal oligothiophene derivative QQT(CN)4 (60 nm thick), 670 to 920 nm Styryl9M dye (680–850 nm)1.3-1.4 Purcell factorref.80 (2019)
    Ag(24 nm)/TiO2(30 nm) 5, 9, 13, and 17 layers with cylindrical Ag antenna CdSeS/ZnS QDs (660 nm)200-fold enhancement for 5-layered HMMref.88 (2020)
    Au(15 nm)/SiO2(25 nm) 3, 5, and 8 periods Emitter (600–1600 nm)60–85 (Theory)ref.82 (2020)
    Ag(16 nm)/Al2O3(24 nm), 3 periods WS2 monolayer (615 nm) 30-fold enhancement of the overall PL intensityref.90 (2020)
    Ag(25 nm)/LiF(35 nm) and Ag(40 nm)/LiF(40 nm), 6 or 8 periodsCsPbI3 Perovskite nanocrystals (520 nm) 3-fold Purcell enhancementref.94 (2020)
    Au(10 nm)/ Al2O3(10 nm), 2–7 periods BA2Cs3MA3Pb7Br2I20 Perovskite film (700 nm) 1.6-3-fold Purcell enhancement depending on number of periodsref.95(2021)
    Ag(25 nm)/PMMA(40 nm) and Ag(25 nm)/PMMA(30 nm), 4 periods on paperMAPbBr3 perovskite nanocrystals (520–550 nm) 3.5-fold intensity enhancementref.96 (2021)
    Aperiodic Ag (20 nm, 6 layers)/SiO2(20 nm, 6 layers) in Fibonacci sequence Colloidal CdSe/ZnS QDs (640 nm)1.6 than Ag layer, 1.35 than periodic materialref.97 (2014)
    Aperiodic Ag(20 nm, 8 layers)/SiO2(80 nm, 8 layers) in Tue-Morse (TM) sequence Colloidal CdSe/ZnS QDs (640 nm)1.45 than glass substrateref.98 (2019)
    Table 1. Summary of photoluminescence enhancement by multilayer HMM structures. Unless noted, emitters are located on the top surface of HMM structures and the works are experimental.
    HMM structures and materialsEmitters (emission peak wavelength)Enhancement factorReferences (year)
    Ag nanowires, 35 nm diameter, 15% volume fraction in Al2O3 host IR-140 laser dye (892 nm)6-fold reduction of lifetimeref.102 (2010)
    Au nanorods, 38 nm diameter, 150 nm height, and 80 nm pitch.LD700 dye (700 nm)50ref.103 (2017)
    Au nanorods, 40 and 25 nm diameter, 250 nm height, and surface densities of 35% and 14%PVA embedded with R101 dye (606 nm) 4.6ref.108 (2017)
    Silver nanowire-alumina HMM (filling fractions f=0.15 and 0.2) CdSe QDs of diameters 5 nm and 6.5 nm (580 and 670 nm)2−3 for thef = 0.15 against f = 0.2 ref.109 (2017)
    Au nanorod, 50 nm diameter, 100 nm pitch, and 250 nm heightD1 (fluorescein, 514 nm), D2 (Alexa 514, 550 nm), D3 (ATTO 550, 575 nm) and D4 (ATTO 647N, 670 nm)30ref.104 (2017)
    Au nanorod, 50 nm diameter, 260 nm height, 100 nm inter-rod spacingATTO 550 and ATTO 647N dyes (554 nm)13 FRET rateref.105 (2018)
    Au nanorod, 50 nm diameter, 250 nm height, 100 nm inter-rod spacingRuthnium-based phosphorescent complex (Ru(dpp), 620 nm)2750 (Theory)ref.107 (2019)
    Au nanorod (60 nm diameter and 110, 160, and 240 nm lengths), nanocone (cone base ~40–60 nm, cone apex < 2 nm), nanopenscil (60 nm base diameter and 10 nm at the top)None40, 60 at 596 nm, and 105 at 660 nm of the field enhancementref.106 (2019)
    Table 2. Summary of photoluminescence enhancement by plasmonic nanowire HMM structures. Unless noted, emitters are located on the top surface of HMM structures and the works are experimental.
    HMM structures and materialsEmitters (emission peak wavelength)Enhancement factorReferences (year)
    1D grating (P=200 nm) on Ag(9 nm)/Si (10 nm), 15 period R6G dye (600 nm)80ref.110 (2014)
    1D grating (P=300 nm) on Ag(12 nm)/SiO2(83 nm), 4 period CdSe/ZnS QDs (570–680 nm) 6ref.112 (2017)
    1D grating (P=200 nm) on Ag(10 nm, 10 layer)/ Si(10 nm, 11 layers) Dipole emitters (582 nm)120 (Theory)ref.111 (2018)
    Square lattice grating (P=500 nm) on Ag(12 nm)/Al2O3(23 nm), 6 period Coumarin 500 (510 nm)18ref.113 (2014)
    Dye molecules embedded grating-coupled HMM (GC-DEHMM) (P=500 nm and hole radius 100 nm) on Ag(12 nm)/SiO2(5 nm)/dye-dissolved PMMA(15 nm) DCM dye (580 nm)35 for the GC-DEHMM, 17 GC-DEHMM with respect to the DEHMMref.119 (2016)
    Hypercrystal, hexagonal lattice grating (P=280 nm and hole radius 100 nm) on Ag(20 nm)/Al2O3(20 nm) MoS2 (660 nm) WS2(620 nm) 56 times enhancement for WS2, 60 times for MoS2ref.120 (2016)
    Hypercrystal, hexagonal lattice grating (P=280–300 nm) on Ag(15 nm)/Al2O3(15 nm) multilayer, 7 period CdSe/ZnS QDs (630 nm)20 timesref.114 (2017)
    Bullseye grating (P=400 nm) on multilayer HMM Ag (10 nm)/TiO2(30 nm), 4.5 period Emitter (800 nm)6 far-field Purcel factor (Theory)ref.121 (2013)
    Bullseye grating (P=250–600 nm) on Ag(12 nm)/Al2O3(20 nm) multilayer CdSe/ZnS quantum dots (630 nm)20ref.122 (2015)
    Si bullseye grating (P=600 nm) on Au nanowire (44 nm pitch) in PMMA HMM (100 nm thickness) Dye (850 nm)18 (Theory)ref.123 (2019)
    Table 3. Summary of photoluminescence enhancement by grating out-coupler on HMM structures. Unless noted, emitters are located on the top surface of HMM structures and the works are experimental. Here P is the pitch or lattice constant of the grating out-coupler.
    Leonid Yu. Beliaev, Osamu Takayama, Pavel N. Melentiev, Andrei V. Lavrinenko. Photoluminescence control by hyperbolic metamaterials and metasurfaces: a review[J]. Opto-Electronic Advances, 2021, 4(8): 210031-1
    Download Citation