• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 9, Issue 6, 992 (2021)
Tianfeng Feng1、†, Changliang Ren2、5、†,*, Qin Feng1、†, Maolin Luo1, Xiaogang Qiang3, Jing-Ling Chen4、6、*, and Xiaoqi Zhou1、7、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies and School of Physics, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Low-Dimensional Quantum Structures and Quantum Control of Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory for Matter Microstructure and Function of Hunan Province, Department of Physics and Synergetic Innovation Center for Quantum Effects and Applications, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
  • 3National Innovation Institute of Defense Technology, AMS, Beijing 100071, China
  • 4Theoretical Physics Division, Chern Institute of Mathematics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
  • 5e-mail: renchangliang@hunnu.edu.cn
  • 6e-mail: chenjl@nankai.edu.cn
  • 7e-mail: zhouxq8@mail.sysu.edu.cn
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.411033 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Tianfeng Feng, Changliang Ren, Qin Feng, Maolin Luo, Xiaogang Qiang, Jing-Ling Chen, Xiaoqi Zhou. Steering paradox for Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen argument and its extended inequality[J]. Photonics Research, 2021, 9(6): 992 Copy Citation Text show less
    References

    [1] A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?. Phys. Rev., 47, 777-780(1935).

    [2] E. Schrödinger. Discussion of probability relations between separated systems. Naturwissenschaften, 23, 807-812(1935).

    [3] H. M. Wiseman, S. J. Jones, A. C. Doherty. Steering, entanglement, nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Phys. Rev. Lett., 98, 140402(2007).

    [4] J. S. Bell. On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. Physics, 1, 195-200(1964).

    [5] N. Brunner, D. Cavalcanti, S. Pironio, V. Scarani, S. Wehner. Bell nonlocality. Rev. Mod. Phys., 86, 419-478(2014).

    [6] J. Clauser, M. Horne, A. Shimony, R. Holt. Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett., 23, 880-884(1969).

    [7] N. D. Mermin. Extreme quantum entanglement in a superposition of macroscopically distinct states. Phys. Rev. Lett., 65, 1838-1840(1990).

    [8] D. Collins, N. Gisin, N. Linden, S. Massar, S. Popescu. Bell inequalities for arbitrarily high-dimensional systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 040404(2002).

    [9] M. Kafatos, D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, A. Zeilinger. Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory, and Conceptions of the Universe, 69(1989).

    [10] L. Hardy. Nonlocality for two particles without inequalities for almost all entangled states. Phys. Rev. Lett., 71, 1665-1668(1993).

    [11] A. Aspect, P. Grangier, G. Roger. Experimental tests of realistic local theories via Bell’s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett., 47, 460-463(1981).

    [12] J. W. Pan, D. Bouwmeester, M. Daniell, H. Weinfurter, A. Zeilinger. Experimental test of quantum nonlocality in three-photon Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger entanglement. Nature, 403, 515-519(2000).

    [13] Y. H. Luo, H.-Y. Su, H.-L. Huang, X.-L. Wang, T. Yang, L. Li, N.-L. Liu, J.-L. Chen, C.-Y. Lu, J.-W. Pan. Experimental test of generalized Hardy’s paradox. Sci. Bull., 63, 1611-1615(2018).

    [14] M. D. Reid, P. D. Drummond, E. G. Cavalcanti, W. P. Bowen, P. K. Lam, H. A. Bachor, U. L. Andersen, G. Leuchs. The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox: from concepts to applications. Rev. Mod. Phys., 81, 1727-1751(2009).

    [15] D. J. Saunders, S. J. Jones, H. M. Wiseman, G. J. Pryde. Experimental EPR-steering using Bell-local states. Nat. Phys., 6, 845-849(2010).

    [16] K. Sun, J. S. Xu, X. J. Ye, Y. C. Wu, J. L. Chen, C. F. Li, G. C. Guo. Experimental demonstration of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering game based on the all-versus-nothing proof. Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, 140402(2014).

    [17] S. Armstrong, M. Wang, R. Y. Teh, Q. H. Gong, Q. Y. He, J. Janousek, H. A. Bachor, M. D. Reid, P. K. Lam. Multipartite Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering and genuine tripartite entanglement with optical networks. Nat. Phys., 11, 167-172(2015).

    [18] A. J. Bennet, D. A. Evans, D. J. Saunders, C. Branciard, E. G. Cavalcanti, H. M. Wiseman, G. J. Pryde. Arbitrarily loss-tolerant Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering allowing a demonstration over 1 km of optical fiber with no detection loophole. Phys. Rev. X, 2, 031003(2012).

    [19] J. Schneeloch, P. B. Dixon, G. A. Howland, C. J. Broadbent, J. C. Howell. Violation of continuous-variable Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering with discrete measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett., 110, 130407(2013).

    [20] M. Fadel, T. Zibold, B. Decamps, P. Treutlein. Spatial entanglement patterns and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering in Bose-Einstein condensates. Science, 360, 409-413(2018).

    [21] F. Dolde, I. Jakobi, B. Naydenov, N. Zhao, S. Pezzagna, C. Trautmann, J. Meijer, P. Neumann, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup. Room-temperature entanglement between single defect spins in diamond. Nat. Phys., 9, 139-143(2013).

    [22] M. Dabrowski, M. Parniak, W. Wasilewski. Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox in a hybrid bipartite system. Optica, 4, 272-275(2017).

    [23] D. Cavalcanti, P. Skrzypczyk, G. H. Aguilar, R. V. Nery, P. H. S. Ribeiro, S. P. Walborn. Detection of entanglement in asymmetric quantum networks and multipartite quantum steering. Nat. Commun., 6, 7941(2015).

    [24] Q. Zeng, B. Wang, P. Li, X. Zhang. Experimental high-dimensional Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering. Phys. Rev. Lett., 120, 030401(2018).

    [25] J. L. Chen, H. Y. Su, Z. P. Xu, A. K. Pati. Sharp contradiction for local-hidden-state model in quantum steering. Sci. Rep., 6, 32075(2016).

    [26] N. D. Mermin. Quantum mysteries refined. Am. J. Phys., 62, 880-887(1994).

    [27] S. H. Jiang, Z. P. Xu, H. Y. Su, A. K. Pati, J. L. Chen. Generalized Hardy’s paradox. Phys. Rev. Lett., 120, 050403(2018).

    [28] 28For example, the maximal violation value for the usual three-setting steering inequality (8) is 1+2 sin 2α. Hence, only when α>arcsin3−122≈0.1873 can the usual LSI be violated. However, the pure state violates the GLSI (7) for the whole region α∈(0,π/2); thus, the GLSI is stronger than the usual LSI in detecting the EPR steerability of pure entangled states.

    [29] P. G. Kwiat, K. Mattle, H. Weinfurter, A. Zeilinger. New high-intensity source of polarization-entangled photon pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, 4337-4341(1995).

    [30] E. Wigner. On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium. Phys. Rev., 40, 749-760(1932).

    [31] J. L. Chen, X. J. Ye, C. Wu, H. Y. Su, A. Cabello, L. C. Kwek, C. H. Oh. All-versus-nothing proof of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering. Sci. Rep., 3, 02143(2013).

    [32] R. Uola, A. C. S. Costa, H. C. Nguyen, O. Gühne. Quantum steering. Rev. Mod. Phys., 92, 015001(2020).

    [33] C. Branciard, E. G. Cavalcanti, S. P. Walborn, V. Scarani, H. M. Wiseman. One-sided device-independent quantum key distribution: security, feasibility, and the connection with steering. Phys. Rev. A, 85, 010301(2012).

    [34] P. Skrzypczyk, D. Cavalcanti. Maximal randomness generation from steering inequality violations using qudits. Phys. Rev. Lett., 120, 260401(2018).

    [35] Y. Guo, S. Cheng, X. Hu, B. Liu, E. Huang, Y. Huang, C. Li, G. Guo, E. G. Cavalcanti. Experimental measurement-device-independent quantum steering and randomness generation beyond qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett., 123, 170402(2019).

    [36] M. Piani, J. Watrous. Necessary and sufficient quantum information characterization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering. Phys. Rev. Lett., 114, 060404(2015).

    [37] K. Sun, X. Ye, Y. Xiao, X. Xu, Y. Wu, J. Xu, J. Chen, C. Li, G. Guo. Demonstration of Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen steering with enhanced subchannel discrimination. npj Quantum Inf., 4, 12(2018).

    Tianfeng Feng, Changliang Ren, Qin Feng, Maolin Luo, Xiaogang Qiang, Jing-Ling Chen, Xiaoqi Zhou. Steering paradox for Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen argument and its extended inequality[J]. Photonics Research, 2021, 9(6): 992
    Download Citation