• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 56, Issue 14, 141501 (2019)
Xianming Xiong1、2、*, Hongqiang Shi1, and Xingyu Zeng1
Author Affiliations
  • 1 School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China
  • 2 Key Laboratory of Optoelectronics Information Processing for Guangxi Universities, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP56.141501 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Xianming Xiong, Hongqiang Shi, Xingyu Zeng. Surface Defect Detectionon Polished Surface Based on Reflection Moiré[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(14): 141501 Copy Citation Text show less
    Illumination model of high reflection surface
    Fig. 1. Illumination model of high reflection surface
    Schematic of defect detection device
    Fig. 2. Schematic of defect detection device
    Schematic of deflection light in stripe direction
    Fig. 3. Schematic of deflection light in stripe direction
    Schematic of effective detection area
    Fig. 4. Schematic of effective detection area
    Images of standard stripe. (a) Stripe image generated by MATLAB; (b) moiré image taken by camera
    Fig. 5. Images of standard stripe. (a) Stripe image generated by MATLAB; (b) moiré image taken by camera
    Different types of defect samples. (a) Standard surface; (b) sand hole; (c) orange skin; (d) belt marks
    Fig. 6. Different types of defect samples. (a) Standard surface; (b) sand hole; (c) orange skin; (d) belt marks
    Characterizations of different defects on moiré image. (a) Standard surface; (b) sand hole; (c) orange skin; (d) belt marks
    Fig. 7. Characterizations of different defects on moiré image. (a) Standard surface; (b) sand hole; (c) orange skin; (d) belt marks
    Stripe image of sand hole defect
    Fig. 8. Stripe image of sand hole defect
    Defect stripe images in different stripe distances. (a) Stripe spacing of 0.25 mm; (b) stripe spacing of 0.50 mm; (c) stripe spacing of 2.00 mm
    Fig. 9. Defect stripe images in different stripe distances. (a) Stripe spacing of 0.25 mm; (b) stripe spacing of 0.50 mm; (c) stripe spacing of 2.00 mm
    Gray distributions of different defects. (a) Standard surface; (b) sand hole; (c) orange skin; (d) belt marks
    Fig. 10. Gray distributions of different defects. (a) Standard surface; (b) sand hole; (c) orange skin; (d) belt marks
    Gray distributions of improved fringe images. (a) Standard surface; (b) sand hole; (c) orange skin; (d) belt marks
    Fig. 11. Gray distributions of improved fringe images. (a) Standard surface; (b) sand hole; (c) orange skin; (d) belt marks
    Diagram of defect detection algorithm
    Fig. 12. Diagram of defect detection algorithm
    Image preprocessing module. (a) Original image; (b) image centerline; (c) corrected image centerline; (d) corrected image
    Fig. 13. Image preprocessing module. (a) Original image; (b) image centerline; (c) corrected image centerline; (d) corrected image
    Processing results of sand hole defect by algorithm. (a) Original image; (b) ROI grayscale image;(c) image after defect enhancement;(d) image after defect feature extraction; (e) morphologically processed image; (f) identification result
    Fig. 14. Processing results of sand hole defect by algorithm. (a) Original image; (b) ROI grayscale image;(c) image after defect enhancement;(d) image after defect feature extraction; (e) morphologically processed image; (f) identification result
    Processing results of belt mark defect by algorithm. (a) Original image; (b) ROI grayscale image;(c) image after defect enhancement;(d) image after defect feature extraction; (e) morphologically processed image; (f) identification result
    Fig. 15. Processing results of belt mark defect by algorithm. (a) Original image; (b) ROI grayscale image;(c) image after defect enhancement;(d) image after defect feature extraction; (e) morphologically processed image; (f) identification result
    Processing results of orange skin defect by algorithm. (a) Original image; (b) ROI grayscale image;(c) image after defect enhancement;(d) image after defect feature extraction; (e) morphologically processed image; (f) identification results
    Fig. 16. Processing results of orange skin defect by algorithm. (a) Original image; (b) ROI grayscale image;(c) image after defect enhancement;(d) image after defect feature extraction; (e) morphologically processed image; (f) identification results
    Defect detection and labeling results. (a) Sand hole; (b) orange skin; (c) belt mark; (d) pit
    Fig. 17. Defect detection and labeling results. (a) Sand hole; (b) orange skin; (c) belt mark; (d) pit
    DefecttypeSamplesnumberDetectionnumberDetectionrate /%
    Belt mark12812194.5
    Sand hole13212695.5
    Orange skin11310592.9
    Standard artifacts10810799.1
    Total48145995.4
    Table 1. Different defect detection results and identifying statistical results
    Xianming Xiong, Hongqiang Shi, Xingyu Zeng. Surface Defect Detectionon Polished Surface Based on Reflection Moiré[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2019, 56(14): 141501
    Download Citation