• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 10, Issue 5, 1264 (2022)
Jianan Duan1、5、†,*, Bozhang Dong1、†, Weng W. Chow2, Heming Huang1, Shihao Ding1, Songtao Liu3、6, Justin C. Norman3、7, John E. Bowers3, and Frédéric Grillot1、4
Author Affiliations
  • 1LTCI, Télécom Paris, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, 91120 Palaiseau, France
  • 2Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185, USA
  • 3Institute for Energy Efficiency, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA
  • 4Center for High Technology Materials, University of New-Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106, USA
  • 5Current address: State Key Laboratory on Tunable Laser Technology, School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
  • 6Current address: Ayar Labs, Santa Clara, California 95054, USA
  • 7Current address: Quintessent, Inc., Goleta, California 93117, USA
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.448082 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Jianan Duan, Bozhang Dong, Weng W. Chow, Heming Huang, Shihao Ding, Songtao Liu, Justin C. Norman, John E. Bowers, Frédéric Grillot. Four-wave mixing in 1.3 μm epitaxial quantum dot lasers directly grown on silicon[J]. Photonics Research, 2022, 10(5): 1264 Copy Citation Text show less
    Epitaxial structure of the QD laser on silicon.
    Fig. 1. Epitaxial structure of the QD laser on silicon.
    Optical injection locking setup used for the four-wave mixing experiments.
    Fig. 2. Optical injection locking setup used for the four-wave mixing experiments.
    Optical spectra from a four-wave mixing experiment for (a) undoped QD laser with upconversion frequency detuning of −114 GHz (probe–drive mode number difference Δm=3); (b) p-doped QD laser with upconversion frequency detuning of −89 GHz (probe–drive mode number difference Δm=3) and QW laser with upconversion frequency detuning of −110 GHz (probe–drive mode number difference Δm=1). The different colored lines indicate signal power increases with increasing probe power.
    Fig. 3. Optical spectra from a four-wave mixing experiment for (a) undoped QD laser with upconversion frequency detuning of 114  GHz (probe–drive mode number difference Δm=3); (b) p-doped QD laser with upconversion frequency detuning of 89  GHz (probe–drive mode number difference Δm=3) and QW laser with upconversion frequency detuning of 110  GHz (probe–drive mode number difference Δm=1). The different colored lines indicate signal power increases with increasing probe power.
    Conversion efficiency of four-wave mixing for p-doped QD, undoped QD, and QW lasers as a function of probe–drive frequency detuning.
    Fig. 4. Conversion efficiency of four-wave mixing for p-doped QD, undoped QD, and QW lasers as a function of probe–drive frequency detuning.
    Signal–drive ratio ηsd as a function of probe–drive ratio ηpd for p-doped QD, undoped QD, and QW lasers. The lasers are biased at twice threshold current. The data points are from the experiment with probe–drive injection frequency detuning Δ and probe–drive mode number difference Δm as indicated. The dashed curves are calculated from multimode laser theory indicating the corresponding FWM coefficient.
    Fig. 5. Signal–drive ratio ηsd as a function of probe–drive ratio ηpd for p-doped QD, undoped QD, and QW lasers. The lasers are biased at twice threshold current. The data points are from the experiment with probe–drive injection frequency detuning Δ and probe–drive mode number difference Δm as indicated. The dashed curves are calculated from multimode laser theory indicating the corresponding FWM coefficient.
    Jianan Duan, Bozhang Dong, Weng W. Chow, Heming Huang, Shihao Ding, Songtao Liu, Justin C. Norman, John E. Bowers, Frédéric Grillot. Four-wave mixing in 1.3 μm epitaxial quantum dot lasers directly grown on silicon[J]. Photonics Research, 2022, 10(5): 1264
    Download Citation