Fig. 1. Lattice structure diagrams. (a) (d) Lattice type A; (b) (e) lattice type B; (c) (f) lattice type C
Fig. 2. Lattice structure samples printed by SLM
Fig. 3. Finite element analysis model
Fig. 4. Three types of lattice structure stress-strain curves. (a) Lattice type A; (b) lattice type B; (c) lattice type C
Fig. 5. Change of elastic modulus of lattice structure samples with porosity. (a) Aperture is 0.6 mm; (b) aperture is 0.9 mm
Fig. 6. Change of yield strength of lattice structure samples with porosity. (a) Aperture is 0.6 mm; (b) aperture is 0.9 mm
Fig. 7. Numerical relationship between porosity and elastic modulus of lattice structure. (a) Lattice type A; (b) lattice type B; (c) lattice type C
Fig. 8. Lattice structure stress distributions. (a) Lattice type A; (b) lattice type B; (c) lattice type C
Fig. 9. Lattice structure displacement distributions. (a) Lattice type A; (b) lattice type B; (c) lattice type C
Fig. 10. Deformation mechanism of lattice structure. (a) Lattice type A; (b) lattice type B; (c) lattice type C
Fig. 11. Finite element analysis of deformation mechanism. (a) Lattice type A; (b) lattice type B; (c) lattice type C
Fig. 12. Surface details of lattice structure sample captured by the microscope
Fig. 13. Comparison of rod diameters measured in different directions (top view and side view)
No. | Sample | Porosity /% | Cell size /(mm×mm×mm) | Stem diameter /mm | Aperture /mm |
---|
1 | A-50%-0.6 | 50 | 1.75×1.75×1.75 | 0.65 | 0.6 | 2 | A-60%-0.6 | 60 | 1.5×1.5×1.5 | 0.49 | 0.6 | 3 | A-70%-0.6 | 70 | 1.4×1.4×1.4 | 0.40 | 0.6 | 4 | A-80%-0.6 | 80 | 1.3×1.3×1.3 | 0.31 | 0.6 | 5 | B-50%-0.6 | 50 | 1.2×1.2×1.2 | 0.58 | 0.6 | 6 | B-60%-0.6 | 60 | 1.1×1.1×1.1 | 0.48 | 0.6 | 7 | B-70%-0.6 | 70 | 1.0×1.0×1.0 | 0.35 | 0.6 | 8 | B-80%-0.6 | 80 | 0.8×0.8×0.8 | 0.20 | 0.6 | 9 | C-50%-0.6 | 50 | 1.7×1.7×1.7 | 0.60 | 0.6 | 10 | C-60%-0.6 | 60 | 1.5×1.5×1.5 | 0.48 | 0.6 | 11 | C-70%-0.6 | 70 | 1.3×1.3×1.3 | 0.35 | 0.6 | 12 | C-80%-0.6 | 80 | 1.2×1.2×1.2 | 0.26 | 0.6 | 13 | A-50%-0.9 | 50 | 2.8×2.8×2.8 | 1.10 | 0.9 | 14 | A-60%-0.9 | 60 | 2.5×2.5×2.5 | 0.85 | 0.9 | 15 | A-70%-0.9 | 70 | 2.1×2.1×2.1 | 0.58 | 0.9 | 16 | A-80%-0.9 | 80 | 2.0×2.0×2.0 | 0.47 | 0.9 | 17 | B-50%-0.9 | 50 | 1.9×1.9×1.9 | 1.00 | 0.9 | 18 | B-60%-0.9 | 60 | 1.6×1.6×1.6 | 0.65 | 0.9 | 19 | B-70%-0.9 | 70 | 1.4×1.4×1.4 | 0.50 | 0.9 | 20 | B-80%-0.9 | 80 | 1.2×1.2×1.2 | 0.33 | 0.9 | 21 | C-50%-0.9 | 50 | 2.5×2.5×2.5 | 0.90 | 0.9 | 22 | C-60%-0.9 | 60 | 2.2×2.2×2.2 | 0.68 | 0.9 | 23 | C-70%-0.9 | 70 | 2.0×2.0×2.0 | 0.55 | 0.9 | 24 | C-80%-0.9 | 80 | 1.8×1.8×1.8 | 0.40 | 0.9 |
|
Table 1. Design parameters of lattice structure
No. | Sample | Total volume /mm3 | Defect volume /mm3 | Defect volume ratio /% |
---|
1 | A-70%-0.6 | 163.735 | 0.032 | 0.02 | 2 | B-70%-0.6 | 150.399 | 0.084 | 0.06 | 3 | C-70%-0.6 | 153.983 | 0.146 | 0.09 |
|
Table 2. Printing defects detected by industrial micro-nano CT system