• Photonics Research
  • Vol. 10, Issue 2, 316 (2022)
Zihan Zhao1、2、†, Yue Wang1、†, Xumin Ding1、4、*, Haoyu Li1、5、*, Jiahui Fu2, Kuang Zhang2、6、*, Shah Nawaz Burokur3、7、*, and Qun Wu2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Advanced Microscopy and Instrumentation Research Center, School of Instrumentation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150080, China
  • 2Department of Microwave Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
  • 3LEME, UPL, Univ Paris Nanterre, F92410 Ville d’Avray, France
  • 4e-mail: xuminding@hit.edu.cn
  • 5e-mail: lihaoyu@hit.edu.cn
  • 6e-mail: zhangkuang@hit.edu.cn
  • 7e-mail: sburokur@parisnanterre.fr
  • show less
    DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.439036 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Zihan Zhao, Yue Wang, Xumin Ding, Haoyu Li, Jiahui Fu, Kuang Zhang, Shah Nawaz Burokur, Qun Wu. Compact logic operator utilizing a single-layer metasurface[J]. Photonics Research, 2022, 10(2): 316 Copy Citation Text show less
    Input, hidden, and output layers and parameters of the FCNN used in this paper, and the corresponding physical implementations.
    Fig. 1. Input, hidden, and output layers and parameters of the FCNN used in this paper, and the corresponding physical implementations.
    (a) Curve of the error between the obtained and ideal results during the iteration of FCNN. (b) Designed target output image utilized for training the FCNN. (c) Designed 10 types of input corresponding to all the basic logic operation functions in this paper. (d) Electric field intensity distribution on the output layer when the distance between the hidden and output layers is 10λ, which shows the calculated output results for different input logic operations: (d1) 0 OR 0, (d2) 0 OR 1, (d3) 1 OR 0, (d4) 1 OR 1, (d5) NOT 0, (d6) 0 AND 0, (d7) 0 AND 1, (d8) 1 AND 0, (d9) 1 AND 1, and (d10) NOT 1.
    Fig. 2. (a) Curve of the error between the obtained and ideal results during the iteration of FCNN. (b) Designed target output image utilized for training the FCNN. (c) Designed 10 types of input corresponding to all the basic logic operation functions in this paper. (d) Electric field intensity distribution on the output layer when the distance between the hidden and output layers is 10λ, which shows the calculated output results for different input logic operations: (d1) 0 OR 0, (d2) 0 OR 1, (d3) 1 OR 0, (d4) 1 OR 1, (d5) NOT 0, (d6) 0 AND 0, (d7) 0 AND 1, (d8) 1 AND 0, (d9) 1 AND 1, and (d10) NOT 1.
    (a) Schematic diagram of the unit cell for the proposed single-layer metasurface and corresponding simulation settings. (b) Photograph of the fabricated single-layer metasurface. (c) Phase map of the optimized metasurface-based optical logic operator. (d) Full-wave simulated results of the output electric field intensity distribution for different input logic operations in the observation plane (output layer) located 10λ away from the metasurface: (d1) 0 OR 0, (d2) 0 OR 1, (d3) 1 OR 0, (d4) 1 OR 1, (d5) NOT 0, (d6) 0 AND 0, (d7) 0 AND 1, (d8) 1 AND 0, (d9) 1 AND 1, and (d10) NOT 1.
    Fig. 3. (a) Schematic diagram of the unit cell for the proposed single-layer metasurface and corresponding simulation settings. (b) Photograph of the fabricated single-layer metasurface. (c) Phase map of the optimized metasurface-based optical logic operator. (d) Full-wave simulated results of the output electric field intensity distribution for different input logic operations in the observation plane (output layer) located 10λ away from the metasurface: (d1) 0 OR 0, (d2) 0 OR 1, (d3) 1 OR 0, (d4) 1 OR 1, (d5) NOT 0, (d6) 0 AND 0, (d7) 0 AND 1, (d8) 1 AND 0, (d9) 1 AND 1, and (d10) NOT 1.
    Schematic diagram of the measured scenario for the optical logic operator. The inset shows the structure of the tailored absorbers performing as the input layer.
    Fig. 4. Schematic diagram of the measured scenario for the optical logic operator. The inset shows the structure of the tailored absorbers performing as the input layer.
    (a) Measured results of input electric field intensity distribution on the proposed metasurface for different logic operations: (a1) 0 OR 0, (a2) 0 OR 1, (a3) 1 OR 0, (a4) 1 OR 1, (a5) NOT 0, (a6) 0 AND 0, (a7) 0 AND 1, (a8) 1 AND 0, (a9) 1 AND 1, and (a10) NOT 1. (b) Measured results of all basic logical operations illustrated by the electric field intensity distribution of the output layer in an observation plane located 10λ away from the metasurface: (b1) 0 OR 0, (b2) 0 OR 1, (b3) 1 OR 0, (b4) 1 OR 1, (b5) NOT 0, (b6) 0 AND 0, (b7) 0 AND 1, (b8) 1 AND 0, (b9) 1 AND 1, and (b10) NOT 1. (c) Measured results of all basic logic operations in the form of normalized electric field energy on the line that passes through the two designated zones.
    Fig. 5. (a) Measured results of input electric field intensity distribution on the proposed metasurface for different logic operations: (a1) 0 OR 0, (a2) 0 OR 1, (a3) 1 OR 0, (a4) 1 OR 1, (a5) NOT 0, (a6) 0 AND 0, (a7) 0 AND 1, (a8) 1 AND 0, (a9) 1 AND 1, and (a10) NOT 1. (b) Measured results of all basic logical operations illustrated by the electric field intensity distribution of the output layer in an observation plane located 10λ away from the metasurface: (b1) 0 OR 0, (b2) 0 OR 1, (b3) 1 OR 0, (b4) 1 OR 1, (b5) NOT 0, (b6) 0 AND 0, (b7) 0 AND 1, (b8) 1 AND 0, (b9) 1 AND 1, and (b10) NOT 1. (c) Measured results of all basic logic operations in the form of normalized electric field energy on the line that passes through the two designated zones.
    Zihan Zhao, Yue Wang, Xumin Ding, Haoyu Li, Jiahui Fu, Kuang Zhang, Shah Nawaz Burokur, Qun Wu. Compact logic operator utilizing a single-layer metasurface[J]. Photonics Research, 2022, 10(2): 316
    Download Citation