[1] BANOS-GONZALEZ I, MARTINEZ-FERNANDEZ J, MIGUEL MARTINEZ-PAZ J et al. Assessment of management measures for the conservation of traditional irrigated lands: The case of the Huerta of Murcia (Spain)[D]. Land Use Policy, 81, 382-391(2019).
[2] COE M T, NEPSTAD D C, STICKLER C M et al. The potential ecological costs and cobenefits of REDD: A critical review and case study from the Amazon region[D]. Global Change Biology, 15, 2803-2824(2009).
[4] KRAGT M, MATZEK V, WILSON K A. Mainstreaming of ecosystem services as a rationale for ecological restoration in Australia[D]. Ecosystem Services, 35, 79-86(2019).
[5] BARBIER E. The policy challenges for green economy and sustainable economic development[D]. Natural Resources Forum, 35, 233-245(2011).
[6] BROUWER R, LOGAR I, PAILLEX A. Do the societal benefits of river restoration outweigh their costs?: A cost-benefit analysis[D]. Journal of Environmental Management, 232, 1075-1085(2019).
[7] KHAN I, KHAN S U, ZHAO M J. Ecological degradation of an inland river basin and an evaluation of the spatial and distance effect on willingness to pay for its improvement[D]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 31474-31485(2018).
[8] ALLEN K, ATTLEE A, REED M S et al. A place-based approach to payments for ecosystem services[D]. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 43, 92-106(2017).
[9] FERREIRA A M, MARQUES J C, SEIXAS S. Integrating marine ecosystem conservation and ecosystems services economic valuation: Implications for coastal zones governance[D]. Ecological Indicators, 77, 114-122(2017).
[10] HANLEY N, NEEDHAM K. Valuing a managed realignment scheme: What are the drivers of public willingness to pay?[D]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 170, 29-39(2019).
[11] BOYCE C, CZAJKOWSKI M, HANLEY N et al. Sad or happy?: The effects of emotions on stated preferences for environmental goods[D]. Environmental & Resource Economics, 68, 821-846(2017).
[12] AHTIAINEN H, LAGERKVIST C-J, NIEMINEN E et al. The economic benefits of achieving good environmental status in the finnish marine waters of the Baltic Sea[D]. Marine Policy, 99, 181-189(2019).
[13] HE J, HUANG A P, XU L D. Spatial heterogeneity and transboundary pollution: A contingent valuation (CV) study on the Xijiang River Drainage Basin in South China[D]. China Economic Review, 36, 101-130(2015).
[14] AREGAY F A, YAO L Y, ZHAO M J. Spatial preference heterogeneity for integrated river basin management: The case of the Shiyang River Basin, China[D]. Sustainability, 8, 17-29(2016).
[15] BLIEM M, BROUWER R, GETZNER M et al. Valuation and transferability of the non-market benefits of river restoration in the Danube River Basin using a choice experiment[D]. Ecological Engineering, 87, 20-29(2016).
[16] BROUWER R, BROUWER S, ELEVELD M A et al. Public willingness to pay for alternative management regimes of remote marine protected areas in the North Sea[D]. Marine Policy, 68, 195-204(2016).
[17] BROEKX S, DE VALCK J, LIEKENS I et al. Contrasting collective preferences for outdoor recreation and substitutability of nature areas using hot spot mapping[D]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 151, 64-78(2016).
[18] BROUWER R, LIEKENS I, LIZIN S et al. Accounting for substitution and spatial heterogeneity in a labelled choice experiment[D]. Journal of Environmental Management, 181, 289-297(2016).
[19] DE VALCK J, ROLFE J. Spatial heterogeneity in stated preference valuation: Status, challenges and road ahead[D]. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 11, 355-422(2017).
[20] CARSON R T, DESHAZO J R, VINCENT J R et al. Tropical countries may be willing to pay more to protect their forests[D]. PNAS, 111, 10113-10118(2014).
[21] BROUWER R, LOGAR I. Substitution effects and spatial preference heterogeneity in single-site and multiple-site choice experiments[D]. Land Economics, 94, 302-322(2018).
[22] BROEKX S, DE VALCK J, LANDUYT D et al. Outdoor recreation in various landscapes: Which site characteristics really matter?[D]. Land Use Policy, 65, 186-197(2017).
[23] DJAJA K, RYFFEL A N, VOLLMER D et al. Examining demand for urban river rehabilitation in Indonesia: Insights from a spatially explicit discrete choice experiment[D]. Land Use Policy, 57, 514-525(2016).
[24] GLENK K, MEYERHOFF J, SAGEBIEL J. Spatially explicit demand for afforestation[D]. Forest Policy and Economics, 78, 190-199(2017).
[25] BAKHTIARI F, JACOBSEN J B, THORSEN B J et al. Disentangling distance and country effects on the value of conservation across National Borders[D]. Ecological Economics, 147, 11-20(2018).
[26] ADAMOWICZ W, BOYLE K J, JOHNSTON R J et al. Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies[D]. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 4, 319-405(2017).
[27] KIRCHNER W K. Designing and conducting survey-research: A comprehensive guide[D]. Personnel Psychology, 46, 443-444(1993).
