Chinese urban residents&#39; willingness to pay for ecosystem service of the Tibetan Plateau: A case study of 27 cities in China

Rui ZHANG; Yan-xu LIU; Song ZHAO; Bo-jie FU

doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200305

Journals >Journal of Natural Resources >Volume 35 >Issue 3 >Page 563 > Article

Journal of Natural Resources
Vol. 35, Issue 3, 563 (2020)

Chinese urban residents' willingness to pay for ecosystem service of the Tibetan Plateau: A case study of 27 cities in China

Rui ZHANG¹, Yan-xu LIU^1,*, Song ZHAO¹, and Bo-jie FU^1,2

Author Affiliations

¹State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

²State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, CAS, Beijing 100085, China

show less

DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200305 Cite this Article

Rui ZHANG, Yan-xu LIU, Song ZHAO, Bo-jie FU. Chinese urban residents' willingness to pay for ecosystem service of the Tibetan Plateau: A case study of 27 cities in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(3): 563 Copy Citation Text

show less

Fig. 1. The average WTP for the Tibetan Plateau

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 2. The percentage of payment for ecosystem services

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 3. The difference of payment percentage between the six kinds of ecosystem services

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 4. The relationships between payments and indicators

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 5. The relationships between payments and indicators in different ecosystem services

Download full size | View in the Article

Fig. 6. Correlation coefficient of distance and the level of Cramér's V

Download full size | View in the Article

潜变量	观测变量	代号	说明与赋值
客观情况	年龄/岁	X11	1=25以下,2=26~35,3=36~45,4=46以上
X1	教育程度	X12	1=小学/初中,2=高中/中专,3=本科/大专,4=研究生及以上
	人均月收入/元	X13	1=4000以下,2=4000~8000,3=8000~15000,4=15000以上
主观认知	对青藏高原的认知	X21	1=非常熟悉,2=比较熟悉,3=有一定了解,4=(较)不了解
X2	对WTP的认知	X22	1=非常熟悉,2=比较熟悉,3=有一定了解,4=(较)不了解
	青藏对本地的重要性	X23	1=非常重要,2=比较重要,3=一般重要,4=(较)不重要
管理意愿	居住地的支付意愿	X31	1=非常愿意,2=比较愿意,3=一般愿意,4=(较)不愿意
X3	响应国家政策的意愿	X32	1=非常愿意,2=一般愿意,3=勉强接受,4=不接受
支付金额Y/元	水源涵养	Y1	1=0,2=10,3=20,4=30,5=40,6=50,7=80,8=100,9=200,10=300,11=400,12=500及以上
	土壤保持	Y2
	植物资源	Y3
	污染物降解	Y4
	生物基因资源	Y5
	美学价值	Y6

Table 1. Quantitative criteria

检验指标	信度检验			效度检验
检验指标	Cronbach's Alpha	Spearman-Brown	Guttman Split-Half	KMO	最小共同度	解释率/%	P值
总体	0.923	0.671	0.660	0.948	0.523	74.50	0.000
X1	0.412	0.527	0.501	0.683	0.724	78.30	0.000
X2	0.653	0.496	0.446	0.694	0.463	61.20	0.000
X3	0.516	0.503	0.501	0.500	0.675	68.35	0.000
Y	0.981	0.973	0.947	0.961	0.782	89.42	0.000
理想值	>0.35	>0.35	>0.35	>0.6	>0.4	>50	0.000

Table 2. The reliability and validity of the variables

	均值	变异系数	偏度	峰度
性别	A=1.57,B=1.62,C= 1.59,D=1.54,E=1.59	A=0.32,B=0.30,C= 0.31,D=0.33,E=0.31	A=-0.27,B=-0.50,C= -0.38,D=-0.20,E=-0.38	A=1.07,B=1.25,C= 1.12,D=1.10,E=1.17
年龄	A=1.98,B=1.80,C= 1.75,D=1.98,E=1.94	A=0.44,B=0.83,C= 0.49,D=0.50,E=0.44	A=0.62,B=0.81,C= 0.94,D=0.70,E=0.54	A=2.70,B=3.02,C= 3.11,D=2.44,E=2.50
教育程度	A=2.92,B=2.93,C= 2.85,D=2.95,E=2.64	A=0.23,B=0.19,C= 0.21,D=0.22,E=0.31	A=-0.80,B=-1.07,C= -1.33,D=-0.81,E=-0.85	A=4.37,B=6.48,C= 6.07,D=4.78,E=2.97
人均月收入	A=1.39,B=1.45,C= 1.26,D=1.24,E=1.28	A=0.35,B=0.34,C= 0.35,D=0.35,E=0.35	A=0.47,B=0.20,C= 1.07,D=1.18,E=0.99	A=1.22,B=1.04,C= 2.22,D=2.53,E=2.03

Table 3. Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents

Download Citation

Save the article for my favorites

Paper Information

微信扫一扫：分享

微信扫一扫：分享