Author Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Intense Pulsed Radiation Simulation and Effect, Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology, Xi’an 710024, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Circuit model of CS115 injected on the single wire
Fig. 2. Circuit model of CS115 injected on wire bundles
Fig. 3. Circuit model of CS115 injected on coaxial cable
Fig. 4. Simulated voltage across the terminal load (VTC)with different height of the wire
Fig. 5. Simulated voltage across the terminal load (VTC)with different length of the wire
Fig. 6. Simulated normalized voltage across the terminal load (VTC) with different values
Fig. 7. Simulated voltage across the terminal load (VTC)with different injected point of the wire
Fig. 8. Simulated normalized voltage across the terminal load (VTC) with different values of the series resistance between the impulse generator and injection probe
Fig. 9. Simulated voltage across the terminal load (VTC) with different number of wires
Fig. 10. Simulated voltage across the terminal load of the inner conductor (VTI) with different height of the coaxial cable
Fig. 11. Simulated voltage across the terminal load of the inner conductor (VTI) with different length of the coaxial cable
Fig. 12. Simulated voltage across the terminal load of the inner conductor (VTI) with different load impedance of the shield
Fig. 13. Simulated voltage across the terminal load of the inner conductor (VTI) with different transfer impedance
lw/m
| rise time/ns | Dinj=0.75lw | Dinj=0.5lw | Dinj=0.25lw | Dinj=0.125lw | 0.5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 1.0 | 10 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 1.5 | 13 | 16 | 20 | 20 |
|
Table 1. Rise time of coupling voltage with different length and injected point of the wire
cable | Rdc/mΩ
| Lt/nH
| RG-58 | 14.2 | 1.00 | RG-303 | 14.1 | 0.43 | RG-222 | 6.6 | 0.92 | RG-316 | 26.8 | 0.88 | RG-108 | 17.6 | 4.60 |
|
Table 2. Transfer impedance of different coaxial cables