Author Affiliations
1State Key Laboratory of Precision Measurement Technology and Instrument, Department of Precision Instruments, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China2Department of Electronic and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USAshow less
Fig. 1. Mathematical model of compressed sensing
Fig. 2. Compressed digital holographic model
Fig. 3. Experimental results. (a) Multi-layer structure of 3D object; (b) point spread functions at different layers; (c) 3D reconstruction using traditional back-propagation algorithm; (d) 3D reconstruction using compressive digital holography
Fig. 4. Reconstruction of compressive digital holography without a filter layer
Fig. 5. Compressive digital holography. (a) Schematic diagram of filtering mechanism of compressive digital holography; (b) quality of reconstruction varies with the position of the filter layer
Fig. 6. Digital holography. (a) Recording; (b) reconstruction
Fig. 7. Gabor holographic 3D microscopic imaging system. (a) Schematic diagram of imaging system; (b) captured Gabor hologram
Fig. 8. 3D multi-layer object reconstruction results. (a) Back-propagation algorithm; (b) traditional compressive digital holographic algorithm; (c) local enlarged image of the reconstruction using block compressive digital holographic algorithm
Fig. 9. Particle-flowing 3D video imaging system
Fig. 10. Gabor holograms. (a) Oblique illumination; (b) vertical illumination; (c) 3D particle field reconstruction
Fig. 11. 3D particle field reconstruction results. (a) Back-propagation model; (b) single-angle compression digital holographic model; (c) double-angle compression digital hologram
Fig. 12. 3D reconstruction results. (a)(b) Microscopic 3D reconstruction results of two particles; (c) particle position varies with time in a 3D particle-flowing field
Reference | Hologram | Reconstruction data | Forward transfer matrix | Reconstruction time/h |
---|
Ref. [8] | 712×712 | 712×712×10 | (712×712) ×(712×712×10) | 4 | Ref. [22] | 900×900 | 900×900×2 | (900×900)×(900×900×2) | 1 | Ref. [17] | 960×600 | 960×600×60 | (960×600)×(960×600×60) | 2.5 |
|
Table 1. Computational reconstruction time of several typical compressed digital holograms