• Laser & Optoelectronics Progress
  • Vol. 57, Issue 14, 141006 (2020)
Wei Yu1, Jingjing Xu2, Yuying Liu2、*, Junsheng Zhang2, and Tengteng Li2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Engineering & Technical College of Chengdu University of Technology, Leshan, Sichuan 614000, China;
  • 2School of Information and Control Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/LOP57.141006 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Wei Yu, Jingjing Xu, Yuying Liu, Junsheng Zhang, Tengteng Li. No-Reference Quality Evaluation for Gamut Mapping Images Based on Natural Scene Statistics[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(14): 141006 Copy Citation Text show less
    Framework of our algorithm
    Fig. 1. Framework of our algorithm
    Original image and gamut mapping images with decreasing quality. (a) Original image; (b) gamut mapping image1; (c) gamut mapping image2; (d) gamut mapping image3
    Fig. 2. Original image and gamut mapping images with decreasing quality. (a) Original image; (b) gamut mapping image1; (c) gamut mapping image2; (d) gamut mapping image3
    Changes in the frequency domain moment and entropy of the image with frequency. (a) Change of image frequency domain entropy with frequency; (b) change of image frequency domain mean with frequency; (c) change of image frequency domain standard deviation with frequency
    Fig. 3. Changes in the frequency domain moment and entropy of the image with frequency. (a) Change of image frequency domain entropy with frequency; (b) change of image frequency domain mean with frequency; (c) change of image frequency domain standard deviation with frequency
    Empirical histograms of relative chroma
    Fig. 4. Empirical histograms of relative chroma
    Empirical histograms of relative hue
    Fig. 5. Empirical histograms of relative hue
    Empirical histogram of relative hue and chroma
    Fig. 6. Empirical histogram of relative hue and chroma
    Structure of the AdaBoosting BPNN; (a) Structure of the AdaBoosting algorithm; (b) structure of BPNN
    Fig. 7. Structure of the AdaBoosting BPNN; (a) Structure of the AdaBoosting algorithm; (b) structure of BPNN
    Performance comparison of grayscale features and color features. (a) BS database; (b) IG database; (c) LC database
    Fig. 8. Performance comparison of grayscale features and color features. (a) BS database; (b) IG database; (c) LC database
    Influence of peak value features on algorithm performance. (a) BS database; (b) IG database; (c) LC database
    Fig. 9. Influence of peak value features on algorithm performance. (a) BS database; (b) IG database; (c) LC database
    Example of gamut mapping images. (a) MOS is 0.6268; (b) MOS is 0.5972; (c) MOS is 0.2927; (d) MOS is 0.1341
    Fig. 10. Example of gamut mapping images. (a) MOS is 0.6268; (b) MOS is 0.5972; (c) MOS is 0.2927; (d) MOS is 0.1341
    DatabaseReferenceimageDistortedimageEvaluationGAM
    BS971067519911
    IG6552036988
    LC7257652098
    Table 1. Gamut mapping image quality evaluation databases
    AlgorithmBSIGLC
    PLCCSRCCKRCCRMSEPLCCSRCCKRCCRMSEPLCCSRCCKRCCRMSE
    BRISQUE0.76330.56780.41260.43860.51530.46540.33450.47390.50260.52740.38020.4229
    BIQI0.61880.44220.31350.53350.36800.30780.22270.51150.37770.35210.24860.4516
    DESIQUE0.82130.59410.43540.38780.59870.56660.42110.44400.56920.59730.44290.4367
    DIIVINE0.73390.54570.39490.46030.42890.36940.26940.49860.42100.41110.29200.4441
    NFERM0.74410.55560.40720.45390.43990.41500.29680.49420.49340.49850.36170.4263
    BLIINDS_II0.70810.54990.40310.47770.36460.31020.21840.51270.42740.33230.23700.4449
    IDEAL0.78590.66520.49940.41730.61950.61390.45500.43270.57800.59890.44170.3977
    IL_NIQE0.55450.48490.39370.49230.35600.34160.28080.40190.47480.34590.34390.3842
    NIQE0.58400.44790.38400.51320.37240.36670.29360.46750.47480.32470.24180.3458
    Ours0.81700.67740.51000.39180.73690.70860.55260.37730.62560.61540.46300.3849
    Table 2. Performance comparison of different algorithms in three databases
    ImageMOSDESIQUEBRISQUEIL_NIQEIDEALOurs
    Fig.10(a)0.626821.238218.499920.59774.63530.6736
    Fig.10(b)0.592721.446720.256822.53014.72150.6213
    Fig.10(c)0.292722.108820.748622.25134.39580.3042
    Fig.10(d)0.134120.598526.259522.36214.13150.1556
    Table 3. Predicted results by different algorithms
    Wei Yu, Jingjing Xu, Yuying Liu, Junsheng Zhang, Tengteng Li. No-Reference Quality Evaluation for Gamut Mapping Images Based on Natural Scene Statistics[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2020, 57(14): 141006
    Download Citation