Author Affiliations
College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun, Jilin 130022, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. Focus evaluation curve
Fig. 2. Implementation block diagram of focus evaluation method
Fig. 3. Figures of object model. (a) Bar; (b) Trapezoid; (c) Circle
Fig. 4. Object scanning imaging model
Fig. 5. Simulated defocused sequence images. (a) Bar; (b) Trapezoid; (c) Circle
Fig. 6. Simulated focus evaluation curves. (a) A (136, 92); (b) B (61, 61); (c) C(126, 48)
Fig. 7. Figures of experimental device. (a) Target scanning experiment device figure with lens of f=8 mm; (b) sensor scanning experiment device figure with lens of f=8 mm; (c) sensor scanning experiment device figure with microscope lens of NA=0.65
Fig. 8. Partial defocused images. (a) Defocused image obtained by moving the target under the imaging lens; (b) defocused image obtained by moving the sensor under the imaging lens; (c) defocus image obtained by moving the sensor under the microscope lens; (d) defocused images obtained through lens zoom
Fig. 9. Focus evaluation curves of experimental defocused image. (a) A(222,333); (b) B(380,310); (c) C(290,240); (d) D (180,90)
Symbol | Description | Formula |
---|
λ | Wavelength | | NA | Numerical aperture | | k | Wave number | k=2π/λ | fc | System cut-off frequency | fc=2NA/λ | q | Radial spatial frequency | q=,u,v∈[-fc,fc] | jinc(x) | | jinc(x)=2J1(x)/x | β | | β=arccos(q/fc) | z | Defocus distance of the object plane | |
|
Table 1. Parameter definitions and description
Method | Se | Sp |
---|
A | B | C | Mean value | A | B | C | Mean value |
---|
GEN | 0.005 | 0.061 | 0.038 | 0.035 | 1.51 | 1.86 | 1.90 | 1.76 | GLV | 0.047 | 0.055 | 0.032 | 0.044 | 0.66 | 1.85 | 1.78 | 1.43 | SWAV | 0.004 | 0.032 | 0.025 | 0.020 | 1.42 | 1.66 | 1.67 | 1.58 | SML | 0.003 | 0.017 | 0.061 | 0.027 | 1.51 | 1.68 | 1.54 | 1.57 | DCT | 0.009 | 0.031 | 0.119 | 0.053 | 1.90 | 1.80 | 1.84 | 1.85 | Proposed method | 0.086 | 0.148 | 0.245 | 0.159 | 2.63 | 2.27 | 3.11 | 2.67 |
|
Table 2. Calculation results of simulated defocus image
Device | Parameter |
---|
Sensor | Company / Name | Vieworks / VH-310C | Pixel size | 7.4 μm×7.4 μm | Active image size | 640×480 | Bit | 12 bit, (0--4096) | Lens | Company | Computar | Focal length | 2.4--16 mm | F-number | 2.4 | Microscope | Numerical aperture | 0.65 | Magnification | 40 | Linear stage | Company / Name | PI / M-403.8DG | Resolution | 0.5 μm | Travel range | 200 mm |
|
Table 3. Device parameters used in the experiment
Method | Se | Sp |
---|
A | B | C | Mean value | A | B | C | Mean value |
---|
GEN | 0.190 | 0.052 | 0.118 | 0.703 | 1.349 | 0.165 | 0.185 | 1.180 | GLV | 0.076 | 0.015 | | 0.655 | 1.194 | 0.073 | | 0.746 | SWAV | 0.106 | 0.209 | 0.091 | 0.557 | 1.228 | 0.122 | 0.161 | 0.355 | SML | 0.096 | 0.116 | 0.250 | 0.375 | 1.181 | 0.156 | 0.145 | 0.317 | DCT | 0.208 | 0.012 | 0.400 | 0.756 | 1.392 | 0.287 | 0.275 | 1.223 | Proposed method | 0.303 | 0.734 | 0.839 | 0.973 | 1.816 | 1.313 | 1.965 | 1.993 |
|
Table 4. Calculation results of experimental defocus image