• Acta Optica Sinica
  • Vol. 38, Issue 8, 0815007 (2018)
Peipei Zhou1、2、3、4、*, Qinghai Ding1、5、*, Haibo Luo1、3、4, and Xinglin Hou1、2、3、4
Author Affiliations
  • 1 Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016
  • 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
  • 3 Key Laboratory of Opto-Electronic Information Processing, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016
  • 4 Key Laboratory of Image Understanding and Computer Vision, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016
  • 5 Space Star Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100086
  • show less
    DOI: 10.3788/AOS201838.0815007 Cite this Article Set citation alerts
    Peipei Zhou, Qinghai Ding, Haibo Luo, Xinglin Hou. Anomaly Detection and Location in Crowded Surveillance Videos[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(8): 0815007 Copy Citation Text show less
    Flow chart of abnormal behavior detection and location
    Fig. 1. Flow chart of abnormal behavior detection and location
    Segmented motion-region images. (a) Original image; (b) motion regions achieved by the ViBE method; (c) image with motion magnitude; (d) motion regions achieved by the proposed algorithm
    Fig. 2. Segmented motion-region images. (a) Original image; (b) motion regions achieved by the ViBE method; (c) image with motion magnitude; (d) motion regions achieved by the proposed algorithm
    Filtering results according to motion continuity for the abnormal regions which are predicted by the classifiers
    Fig. 3. Filtering results according to motion continuity for the abnormal regions which are predicted by the classifiers
    Examples of normal and abnormal crowed activities in UMN dataset. (a) Normal behaviors; (b) abnormal behaviors
    Fig. 4. Examples of normal and abnormal crowed activities in UMN dataset. (a) Normal behaviors; (b) abnormal behaviors
    ROC curves of different methods in two criterions on the UCSD ped2 dataset. (a) Frame-level; (b) pixel-level
    Fig. 5. ROC curves of different methods in two criterions on the UCSD ped2 dataset. (a) Frame-level; (b) pixel-level
    Pixel-level detection results with different methods on the UCSD ped2 dataset. (a) Social Force; (b) MPPCA; (c) T-MDT; (d) S-MDT; (e) proposed method
    Fig. 6. Pixel-level detection results with different methods on the UCSD ped2 dataset. (a) Social Force; (b) MPPCA; (c) T-MDT; (d) S-MDT; (e) proposed method
    ROC curves of different methods for frame-level detection on the UMN dataset
    Fig. 7. ROC curves of different methods for frame-level detection on the UMN dataset
    Detection and location results of three different scenes on UMN dataset
    Fig. 8. Detection and location results of three different scenes on UMN dataset
    Relationship curves between the parameter k and the system performance on two datasets
    Fig. 9. Relationship curves between the parameter k and the system performance on two datasets
    MethodFrame-level criterionPixel-level criterion
    EER /%AUCDR /%AUCTime /s
    Social Force[33]42.00.70227.60.217-
    MPPCA[34]31.10.71022.40.222-
    S-MDT[32]28.70.75063.40.6650.69
    T-MDT[32]27.90.76556.80.5220.64
    ST-CNN[23]24.40.86081.90.8800.37
    Motion Energy[16]22.00.81055.00.5800.08
    Proposed10.30.90589.70.9020.26
    Table 1. Comparison results of different methods on the UCSD ped2 dataset for frame-level and pixel-level detection
    MethodAUCEER /%
    Social Force[33]0.94912.6
    Sparse[1]0.9962.8
    H-MDT CRF[19]0.9953.7
    ST-CNN[23]0.9963.3
    Motion Energy[16]0.9894.1
    Proposed0.9892.7
    Table 2. Comparison results of different methods on the UMN dataset in AUC and EER criterion for frame-level detection
    Peipei Zhou, Qinghai Ding, Haibo Luo, Xinglin Hou. Anomaly Detection and Location in Crowded Surveillance Videos[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(8): 0815007
    Download Citation