Author Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 210009, Chinashow less
1. SEM images of dual-layer hollow fiber and single-layer hollow fiber Cross-section morphologies of (a, b) dual-layer hollow fiber precursor, (c, d) dual-layer hollow fiber, (e, f) 1 μm single-layer hollow fiber; SEM images of the surface morphology: (g) dual-layer hollow fiber, (h) 1 μm single-layer hollow fiber
2. XRD patterns of dual-layer hollow fiber membranes with different TiO2 contents
3. SEM images of dual-layer hollow fiber membranes with different Al2O3/PESf mass ratios in outer suspension (a) 2.75; (b) 4.33; (c) 5.60; (d) 7.50; (e) 13.3
4. Influence of Al2O3/PESf mass ratio in outer suspension on pore size distribution of dual-layer hollow fiber membranes
5. SEM images of dual-layer hollow fiber membrane of alumina sintered at different temperatures (a)1250 ℃, (b)1300 ℃, (c) 1350 ℃, (d)1400 ℃
Suspension composition | Inner layer | Outer layer |
---|
Solvent (NMP) | 33.34 | 37.81 | Al2O3 (1 μm) | 55.35 | / | Al2O3 (300 nm) | / | 49.15 | Polymer (PESf) | 9.77 | 11.34 | Additive (PVP) | 1.54 | 1.70 |
|
Table 1. Suspension composition of dual-layer hollow fiber membrane/wt%
Property | η/% | Fracture load/N | Pure water flux/(m3‧m-2‧h-1) | Porosity/% | Average pore size/μm | RTOC/% |
---|
Single-layer (1 μm) | 13.0 | 9 | 3.52 | 51.57 | 0.70 | 95.4 | Single-layer (300 nm) | 16.9 | 19 | 0.86 | 48.20 | 0.13 | 98.4 | Dual-layer (1 μm/300 nm) | 14.3 | 12 | 2.30 | 50.89 | 0.24 | 97 |
|
Table 2. Comparison of properties between single-layer and dual-layer hollow fiber membranes
TiO2 content/wt% | η/% | Fracture load/N | Pure water flux/ (m3‧m-2‧h-1) | Porosity/% | Average pore size/μm |
---|
0 | 14.3 | 12 | 2.30 | 50.89 | 0.240 | 2 | 14.9 | 24 | 1.65 | 48.05 | 0.152 | 5 | 14.9 | 22 | 1.32 | 49.97 | 0.147 | 10 | 15.2 | 20 | 1.21 | 46.43 | 0.150 | 15 | 15.3 | 19 | 1.12 | 45.68 | 0.145 | 20 | 16.3 | 17 | 0.91 | 43.90 | 0.141 |
|
Table 3. Influence of TiO2 content on properties of dual-layer hollow fiber membranes
Al2O3/PESf | Outer suspension viscosity/cP | Fracture load/N | Pure water flux/(m3‧m-2‧h-1) | Porosity/% | Mean pore size/μm | RTOC/% |
---|
2.75 | 7320 | 21 | 1.99 | 49.90 | 0.180 | 97.3 | 4.33 | 8580 | 22 | 1.10 | 52.26 | 0.175 | 97.5 | 5.60 | 9720 | 23 | 1.41 | 53.91 | 0.130 | 97.5 | 7.50 | 11020 | 25 | 1.08 | 53.31 | 0.125 | 97.6 | 13.30 | 58300 | 23 | 0.48 | 52.54 | 0.115 | 97.8 |
|
Table 4. Influence of Al2O3/PESf mass ratio in outer suspension on properties of dual-layer hollow fiber membranes
Temperature/℃ | Fracture load/N | Pure water flux/(m3‧m-2‧h-1) | Porosity/% | Average pore size/μm | RTOC/% |
---|
1250 | 11 | 3.23 | 61.97 | 0.235 | 96.7 | 1300 | 15 | 2.34 | 55.62 | 0.199 | 97.4 | 1350 | 24 | 1.20 | 48.88 | 0.150 | 97.5 | 1400 | 37 | 0.26 | 40.33 | 0.126 | 98.3 |
|
Table 5. Influence of sintering temperature on the properties of dual-layer hollow fiber membranes
Membranes | Sintering temperature/℃ | Average pore size/μm | Pure water flux/ (m3‧m-2‧h-1) | Bending strength/MPa | Fracture load/N | Ref. |
---|
Single-Channel Al2O3 hollow fiber | 1455 | 0.10 | 0.664 | 88.2 | - | [28] | Single-Channel Al2O3 hollow fiber | 1500 | 0.75 | 1.280 | 85.8 | - | [29] | 4-Channel Al2O3 hollow fiber | 1500 | 1.20 | 2.710 | - | 22 | [25] | 7-Channel Al2O3 hollow fiber | 1350 | 0.183 | 1.070 | - | 14 | [30] | 7-Channel YSZ/Al2O3 hollow fiber | 1400 | 230.00 | 1.640 | - | 14 | [31] | 4-Channel 1 μm/300 nm Al2O3 hollow fiber | 1350 | 0.15 | 1.260 | - | 24 | This work |
|
Table 6. Comparison in properties of different hollow fiber ceramic membranes