Author Affiliations
1State Key Laboratory of Advanced Optical Communication Systems and Networks, Department of Electronics, School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China2Frontier Science Center for Nano-optoelectronics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China3Peking University Yangtze Delta Institute of Optoelectronics, Nantong 226010, China4Peng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen 518055, Chinashow less
Fig. 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the hybrid integrated MPF. (b) The operation principles for the bandpass/band-stop switchable filtering response of the integrated MPF. (c) Optical image of the fabricated silicon chip. (d) Optical image of the InP laser diode chip. (e) Photograph of the packaged hybrid integrated MPF that comprises an InP laser, a silicon chip, and auxiliary microlenses and prism.
Fig. 2. (a) Measured transmission spectrum of the high-Q MRR. (b) Measured phase response within a resonance of the high-Q MRR. (c) Measured optical spectra with various DC voltages applied to the TiN microheater.
Fig. 3. (a) Measured output spectra of the InP-based laser chip under different operation temperatures. (b) DSH linewidth measurement (blue dots) and a Voigt curve fit (red line) show a 3 dB Lorentzian linewidth of 150 kHz.
Fig. 4. Experimental setup to measure the band-stop/bandpass filtering response of the integrated MPF.
Fig. 5. (a) Measured RF responses of the band-stop filtering at various center frequencies. (b) 3 dB bandwidths and rejection ratios are plotted versus RF frequencies.
Fig. 6. (a) Measured RF responses of the bandpass filtering at different center frequencies. (b) 3 dB bandwidths and rejection ratios are plotted versus RF frequencies.
Fig. 7. Experimental results for the hybrid all-integrated MPF with package. (a) Measured RF spectra of the band-stop filtering. (b) Measured RF spectra of the bandpass filtering. (c) Measured S21 responses when the InP laser is turned off and turned on, respectively.
Fig. 8. (a) Measured RF link gain and noise figure over the whole tunable frequency range. (b) Measured power of the fundamental (FUND) component and the third-order intermodulation (IMD3) component versus different input RF power.
Fig. 9. High-resolution RF filtering using the integrated MPF as a band-stop filter. The input contains two frequency components (signal at 15 GHz and interferer at 15.25 GHz). (a) Measured RF spectrum when the input is located outside the stopband. (b) Measured RF spectrum when the interferer is filtered by the stop band.
Fig. 10. High-resolution RF filtering using the integrated MPF as a bandpass filter. The input contains two channel signals, i.e., channel 1 (CH1, 11 GHz) and channel 2 (CH2, 13 GHz). (a) Measured RF spectrum when the CH1 is located at the passband. (b) Measured RF spectrum when the CH2 is located at the passband.
Fig. 11. (a) Beam propagation simulation for the hybrid integration of the InP laser and Si chip utilizing micro-optics. (b) Measured total coupling loss between these two chips. Green line: InP laser output subtracting all link propagation loss except coupling loss. Orange line: optical power measured from the monitor grating located behind the DDMZM.
Fig. 12. (a) Measured S21 responses of the modulator. (b) Transmission spectra of the MZ modulator under different voltages. (c) Measured S21 responses of the PD. (d) The tested responsivity of the PD.
Fig. 13. (a) Measurement of the band-stop filter rejection ratio over 1 h continuous operation. (b) Measurement of the 3 dB bandwidth over 1 h continuous operation.
Fig. 14. Time-domain measurement of the TiN microheater placed on the DDMZM. (a) Temporal waveform of the applied square-wave electrical signal. (b) Measured temporal response with a rise/fall time of 15 and 48 μs.
Platform | Integrated Devices | Integration Degree | Filter Type | Tunable Range (GHz) | 3 dB Bandwidth (GHz) | Rejection Ratio (dB) | SFDR () | Gain (dB) | Noise Figure (dB) |
---|
Electronic [44] | N/A | N/A | Band-stop | 4–6/6.3–11.4 | 0.035/0.306 | | N/A | –2 | N/A | Electronic [45] | N/A | N/A | Bandpass | 5.07–5.53 | 0.46 | | N/A | –1.5 | N/A | [22] | Optical filter | 25% | Bandpass | 1–20 | 0.02–0.35 | | N/A | –5 | N/A | [46] | Optical filter | 25% | Band-stop | 0–15 | 3 | | 96.5 | –10.1 | 27.1 | InP [17] | Optical filter | 25% | Bandpass | 0–27 | 1.9–5.4 | 32 | 86.3 | N/A | 23.2 | [47] | Optical filter | 25% | Bandpass/Band-stop | 4–25 | 4.54–9.72/3.65–6.35 | | N/A | –10 | N/A | [48] | Optical filter | 25% | Band-stop | 0–12 | 0.15–0.35 | | 116 | 8 | 15.6 | SOI [15] | Optical filter | 25% | Band-stop | 2–15 | 0.91 | | N/A | N/A | N/A | SOI [16] | Optical filter | 25% | Bandpass | 2–18.4 | 0.17 | 26.5 | N/A | –42 | N/A | SOI [49] | Optical filter | 25% | Bandpass | 4–10 | 0.0035 | 70 | 90.3 | –17.3 | 56.7 | SOI [26] | Optical filter and PD | 50% | Bandpass | 0–25 | 5.3–19.5 | | N/A | N/A | N/A | SOI [25] | Modulator, optical filter, and PD | 75% | Bandpass | 3–10 | 1.93 | 15 | 92.4 | –38.9 | N/A | SOI [42] | Modulator, optical filter, and PD | 75% | Bandpass/Band-stop | 9–21/5–25 | N/A | | N/A | N/A | N/A | InPa [23] | Laser, modulator, optical filter, and PD | 100% | Low-pass | 0–6 | 2.5–5.5 | 30 | 81.4 | –20 | N/A | InP + SOIb (this work) | Laser, modulator, optical filter, and PD | 100% | Bandpass/Band-stop | 3–21/3–25 | 0.36–0.47/0.38–0.45 | | 99.7 | –28.2 | 51.2 |
|
Table 1. Performance Comparison of State-of-the-Art Integrated MPFs and Electronic Microwave Filters